Abstract
Classification is a fundamental skill that impacts on our abilities to read and to write text. The structure and sequence inherent in the science of taxonomy can be used as the basis for instruction in reading comprehension and in writing. The use of concrete, readily manipulated materials enhances vocabulary development by allowing the teacher to label objects and processes as the student experiences them. There are numerous activities which can be employed to enrich experiential learning; these can be directly related to reading and writing exercises. Processes learned with simple materials can be generalized to more abstract content as the students’ proficiency improves. The instructor can control the level of difficulty of the class by writing or selecting materials appropriate to the skills levels of the students involved. Language facility is developed as students progress from the known to the less well known in a series of carefully constructed steps.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barba, R. 1986. Plant classification by computer.Science Scope 9(4):10–11.
Bicak, L. J. and Bicak, C. J. 1988. Scientific method: Historical and contemporary perspectives.The American Biology Teacher 50(6):348–353.
Bransford, J. D. and Stein, B. S. 1984.The Ideal Problem Solver. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Cain, M. T. 1986. What is a fair test? Lessons in problem solving.Science and Children 21(3):8–10.
DeDecker, P. F. 1986. Biology and ethics: Their role in education for the 80s and beyond.The American Biology Teacher 48(5):285–286.
DeDecker, P. F. 1987. Teaching bioethical decision making in high school: A lesson plan.The American Biology Teacher 49(7):428–432.
Ewing, M. S., Campbell, N. J. and Brown, M. J. M. 1987. Improving student attitudes toward biology by encouraging scientific literacy.The American Biology Teacher 49(6):348–350.
Glasenapp, D. J. 1986. The nuts and bolts of classification.The American Biology Teacher 48(6):362–363.
Good, R. and Smith, M. 1987. How do we make students better problem solvers?The Science Teacher 54(4):31–36.
Gruenewald, L. J. and Pollack, S. 1984.Language Interaction in Teaching and Learning. Baltimore: University Press.
Lawrence, G. H. M. 1955.An Introduction to Plant Taxonomy. New York: The Macmillan Company.
McCoy, L. 1988. Coping with dyslexia.The Science Teacher 55(8):25–27.
Texley, J. 1987. Idea Bank: A scavenger hunt for plants.The Science Teacher 54(8):61.
Travers, R. M. W. 1982.Essentials of Learning: The new cognitive learning for students of education. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.
Vargas, M. F. 1986. Writing skills for science labs.The Science Teacher 53(8):29–33.
Vellutino, F. R. 1987. Dyslexia.Scientific American 256(3):34–41.
Williams, J. P. 1984. Categorization, macrostructure and finding the main idea.Journal of Educational Psychology 76:874–879.
Williams, J. P. 1986. Teaching children to identify the main idea of expository texts.Exceptional Children 53:163–168.
Williams, J. P., Taylor, M. R. and DeCani, J. S. 1984. Constructing macrostructure for expository text.Journal of Educational Psychology 75:1065–1075.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carter, C.G. Systematic botany: Science to develop language facility. Annals of Dyslexia 40, 97–106 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648142
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648142