Skip to main content
Log in

What does accessing a morphemic script tell us about reading and reading disorders in an alphabetic script?

  • Part II Research Reflections
  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the commonalities and differences in the processing mechanism of analytic reading in the English orthography and the Chinese orthography. Readers of English generally use the phonological processing route, although the morphological aspect should also be emphasized. Readers of Chinese would need to take advantage of the morphemic nature of the script, although speech recoding is also used. The interplay of the phonological, morphological, syntactic, and semantic processing is emphasized. Reading disorders may implicate certain processing routes, but may spare other components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baron, J. 1977. What we might know about orthographic rules.In S. Dornic (ed.).Attention and Performance VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiderman, I., and Tsao, Y.-C. 1979. On processing Chinese ideographs and English words: Some implications from Stroop test results.Cognitive Psychology 11: 125–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Y. R. 1968.Language and Symbolic Systems. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P. W., Mulcahy, R., and Leong, C. K. 1986.Recognition of Chinese Characters by Fluent Readers. (Manuscript in preparation).

  • Chomsky, N., and Halle, M. 1968.The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. 1981. Disorders of reading and their implications for models of normal reading.Visible Language 15:245–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. 1982. The psycholinguistic analysis of acquired dyslexias: Some illustrations.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B298:151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M., Patterson, K. E., and Marshall, J. C. (eds.). 1980.Deep Dyslexia. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, J. and Leong, C. K. (1982).Psychology of Reading. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, S. P., Tzeng, O. J. L., and Alva, L. 1981. Intralanguage vs. interlanguage Stroop effects in two types of writing systems.Memory and Cognition 6:609–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, I. J. 1963.A Study of Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. 1968.Literacy in Traditional Societies. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glushko, R. 1979. The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5:674–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glushko, R. J. 1981. Principles for pronouncing print: The psychology of phonography.In A. M. Lesgold and C. A. Perfetti (eds.).Interactive Processes in Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatta, T. 1981. Different stages of Kanji processing and their relations to functional hemisphere asymmetries.Japanese Psychological Research 23:27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, D. L. and Tzeng, O. J. L. 1981. Orthographic variation and visual information processing.Psychological Bulletin 90:377–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, H. 1970.Sign, Symbol, and Script: An account of man’s efforts to write. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, H. S. R. and Hoosain, R. (eds.). 1984.Psychological Studies of the Chinese Language. Hong Kong: The Chinese Language Society of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, E. S. 1972. How alphabets might reflect language.In J. F. Kavanagh and I. G. Mattingly (eds.).Language by Ear and By Eye. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. 1973. Hong Kong.In J. Downing (ed.).Comparative Reading: Cross-national studies of behavior and processes in reading and writing. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. 1977. Another view of complex and simplified Chinese characters.Journal of Chinese Linguistics 5:342–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K., Wong, S., Wong, A., and Hiscock, M. 1985. Differential cerebral involvement in perceiving Chinese characters—levels of processing approach.Brain and Language 26:131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. T., Hu, C. Q., Zhu, Y. L., and Sun, B. 1984. Neurolinguistic analysis of Chinese alexia and agraphia.In H. S. R. Kao, and R. Hoosain (eds.).Psychological Studies of the Chinese Language. Hong Kong: The Chinese Language Society of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, S. D. and Pollatsek, A. 1983. Lexical access via an orthographic code? The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS) reconsidered.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22:310–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luszcz, M. A., Bungey, J., and Geffen, G. 1984. Orthographic-morphemic factors in reading: A developmental study.Australian Journal of Psychology 36:355–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. S., Kwan, S. T., and Chao, W. H. 1938. Left occipito-parietal brain tumor with observations on alexia and agraphia in Chinese and in English.The Chinese Medical Journal 54:491–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makita, K. 1968. The rarity of reading disability in Japanese children.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 38:599–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao, T.-t. 1940/1967. On new democracy.Mao Tse-tung hsuan-chi (Selected works of Mao Tse-tung). Vol. 2. Beijing: Foreign Language Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. C. and Newcombe, F. 1973. Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2:175–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, I. G. 1984. Reading, linguistic awareness, and language acquisition.In J. Downing and R. Valtin (eds.).Language Awareness and Learning to Read. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mei, J. Y. (ed.). 1984.Reading in China: Report of the U.S. Reading Study Team to The People’s Republic of China. New York: National Committee on U.S.-China Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, F. and Marshall, J. C. 1981. On psycholinguistic classifications of the acquired dyslexias.Bulletin of the Orton Society 31:29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, R. C. 1963. Individual vocabulary and semantic currency.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 2:122–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., Poritsky, S., and Sotsky, R. 1971. American children with reading problems can easily learn to read English represented by Chinese characters.Science 171:1264–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S. 1985. The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.Cognition 19:1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. T., Meredith, T., Pattison, H. M., and Sterling, C. 1984. The representation of interval word structure in English.In L. Henderson (ed.).Orthographies and Reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. W., Stigler, J. W., Lucker, G. W., Hsu, C.-c., and Kitamura, S. 1982. Reading disabilities: The case of Chinese, Japanese, and English.Child Development 53:1164–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J. R. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology 18:643–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. 1979. Lexical access via an orthographic code: The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS).Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18:21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. 1985. The decoding of words in lexical access: A review of the morphological approach.In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, and G. E. Mackinnon (eds.).Reading Research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol. V. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., and Forster, K. I. 1976. Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15:607–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsao, Y.-C., Wu, M.-F., and Feustel, T. 1981. Stroop interference: Hemisphere difference in Chinese speakers.Brain and Language 13:372–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T’sou, B. K. 1978. Some preliminary observations on aphasia in a Chinese bilingual.Acta Psychologica Taiwanica 20:57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M. T., Feldman, L. B., and Lukatela, G. 1984. The Serbo-Croatian orthography constrains the reader to a phonologically analytic strategy.In L. Henderson (ed.).Orthographies and Reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics. London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., and Wang, S.-Y. 1977. Speech recoding in reading Chinese characters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 3:621–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, O. J. L., and Wang, W. S.-Y. 1983. The first two R’s.American Scientist 71:238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venezky, R. L. 1967. English orthography: Its graphical structure and relation to sound.Reading Research Quarterly 2:75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venezky, R. L. 1970.The Structure of English Orthography. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W. S.-Y. 1973. The Chinese language.Scientific American 228:50–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W. S.-Y., and Cheng, C. C. 1970. Implementation of phonological change: The Shuang-feng Chinese case.Papers for the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.

  • Wong, S. L. 1968.A Chinese Syllabary Pronounced According to the Dialect of Canton. Hong Kong: Chung Hwa Publishing. [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was assisted in part by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Leave Fellowship 451-84-2280 for the 1984–1985 academic year.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leong, C.K. What does accessing a morphemic script tell us about reading and reading disorders in an alphabetic script?. Annals of Dyslexia 36, 82–102 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648023

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648023

Keywords

Navigation