Abstract
This paper discusses the commonalities and differences in the processing mechanism of analytic reading in the English orthography and the Chinese orthography. Readers of English generally use the phonological processing route, although the morphological aspect should also be emphasized. Readers of Chinese would need to take advantage of the morphemic nature of the script, although speech recoding is also used. The interplay of the phonological, morphological, syntactic, and semantic processing is emphasized. Reading disorders may implicate certain processing routes, but may spare other components.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baron, J. 1977. What we might know about orthographic rules.In S. Dornic (ed.).Attention and Performance VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Beiderman, I., and Tsao, Y.-C. 1979. On processing Chinese ideographs and English words: Some implications from Stroop test results.Cognitive Psychology 11: 125–132.
Chao, Y. R. 1968.Language and Symbolic Systems. London: Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, P. W., Mulcahy, R., and Leong, C. K. 1986.Recognition of Chinese Characters by Fluent Readers. (Manuscript in preparation).
Chomsky, N., and Halle, M. 1968.The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
Coltheart, M. 1981. Disorders of reading and their implications for models of normal reading.Visible Language 15:245–286.
Coltheart, M. 1982. The psycholinguistic analysis of acquired dyslexias: Some illustrations.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B298:151–164.
Coltheart, M., Patterson, K. E., and Marshall, J. C. (eds.). 1980.Deep Dyslexia. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Downing, J. and Leong, C. K. (1982).Psychology of Reading. New York: Macmillan.
Fang, S. P., Tzeng, O. J. L., and Alva, L. 1981. Intralanguage vs. interlanguage Stroop effects in two types of writing systems.Memory and Cognition 6:609–617.
Gelb, I. J. 1963.A Study of Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goody, J. 1968.Literacy in Traditional Societies. London: Cambridge University Press.
Glushko, R. 1979. The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5:674–691.
Glushko, R. J. 1981. Principles for pronouncing print: The psychology of phonography.In A. M. Lesgold and C. A. Perfetti (eds.).Interactive Processes in Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hatta, T. 1981. Different stages of Kanji processing and their relations to functional hemisphere asymmetries.Japanese Psychological Research 23:27–36.
Hung, D. L. and Tzeng, O. J. L. 1981. Orthographic variation and visual information processing.Psychological Bulletin 90:377–414.
Jensen, H. 1970.Sign, Symbol, and Script: An account of man’s efforts to write. London: Allen and Unwin.
Kao, H. S. R. and Hoosain, R. (eds.). 1984.Psychological Studies of the Chinese Language. Hong Kong: The Chinese Language Society of Hong Kong.
Klima, E. S. 1972. How alphabets might reflect language.In J. F. Kavanagh and I. G. Mattingly (eds.).Language by Ear and By Eye. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Leong, C. K. 1973. Hong Kong.In J. Downing (ed.).Comparative Reading: Cross-national studies of behavior and processes in reading and writing. New York: Macmillan.
Leong, C. K. 1977. Another view of complex and simplified Chinese characters.Journal of Chinese Linguistics 5:342–346.
Leong, C. K., Wong, S., Wong, A., and Hiscock, M. 1985. Differential cerebral involvement in perceiving Chinese characters—levels of processing approach.Brain and Language 26:131–145.
Li, X. T., Hu, C. Q., Zhu, Y. L., and Sun, B. 1984. Neurolinguistic analysis of Chinese alexia and agraphia.In H. S. R. Kao, and R. Hoosain (eds.).Psychological Studies of the Chinese Language. Hong Kong: The Chinese Language Society of Hong Kong.
Lima, S. D. and Pollatsek, A. 1983. Lexical access via an orthographic code? The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS) reconsidered.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22:310–332.
Luszcz, M. A., Bungey, J., and Geffen, G. 1984. Orthographic-morphemic factors in reading: A developmental study.Australian Journal of Psychology 36:355–365.
Lyman, R. S., Kwan, S. T., and Chao, W. H. 1938. Left occipito-parietal brain tumor with observations on alexia and agraphia in Chinese and in English.The Chinese Medical Journal 54:491–516.
Makita, K. 1968. The rarity of reading disability in Japanese children.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 38:599–614.
Mao, T.-t. 1940/1967. On new democracy.Mao Tse-tung hsuan-chi (Selected works of Mao Tse-tung). Vol. 2. Beijing: Foreign Language Press.
Marshall, J. C. and Newcombe, F. 1973. Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2:175–199.
Mattingly, I. G. 1984. Reading, linguistic awareness, and language acquisition.In J. Downing and R. Valtin (eds.).Language Awareness and Learning to Read. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Mei, J. Y. (ed.). 1984.Reading in China: Report of the U.S. Reading Study Team to The People’s Republic of China. New York: National Committee on U.S.-China Relations.
Newcombe, F. and Marshall, J. C. 1981. On psycholinguistic classifications of the acquired dyslexias.Bulletin of the Orton Society 31:29–46.
Oldfield, R. C. 1963. Individual vocabulary and semantic currency.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 2:122–130.
Rozin, P., Poritsky, S., and Sotsky, R. 1971. American children with reading problems can easily learn to read English represented by Chinese characters.Science 171:1264–1267.
Seidenberg, M. S. 1985. The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.Cognition 19:1–30.
Smith, P. T., Meredith, T., Pattison, H. M., and Sterling, C. 1984. The representation of interval word structure in English.In L. Henderson (ed.).Orthographies and Reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stevenson, H. W., Stigler, J. W., Lucker, G. W., Hsu, C.-c., and Kitamura, S. 1982. Reading disabilities: The case of Chinese, Japanese, and English.Child Development 53:1164–1181.
Stroop, J. R. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology 18:643–661.
Taft, M. 1979. Lexical access via an orthographic code: The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS).Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18:21–39.
Taft, M. 1985. The decoding of words in lexical access: A review of the morphological approach.In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, and G. E. Mackinnon (eds.).Reading Research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol. V. New York: Academic Press.
Taft, M., and Forster, K. I. 1976. Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15:607–620.
Tsao, Y.-C., Wu, M.-F., and Feustel, T. 1981. Stroop interference: Hemisphere difference in Chinese speakers.Brain and Language 13:372–378.
T’sou, B. K. 1978. Some preliminary observations on aphasia in a Chinese bilingual.Acta Psychologica Taiwanica 20:57–64.
Turvey, M. T., Feldman, L. B., and Lukatela, G. 1984. The Serbo-Croatian orthography constrains the reader to a phonologically analytic strategy.In L. Henderson (ed.).Orthographies and Reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics. London: Erlbaum.
Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., and Wang, S.-Y. 1977. Speech recoding in reading Chinese characters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 3:621–630.
Tzeng, O. J. L., and Wang, W. S.-Y. 1983. The first two R’s.American Scientist 71:238–243.
Venezky, R. L. 1967. English orthography: Its graphical structure and relation to sound.Reading Research Quarterly 2:75–105.
Venezky, R. L. 1970.The Structure of English Orthography. The Hague: Mouton.
Wang, W. S.-Y. 1973. The Chinese language.Scientific American 228:50–63.
Wang, W. S.-Y., and Cheng, C. C. 1970. Implementation of phonological change: The Shuang-feng Chinese case.Papers for the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.
Wong, S. L. 1968.A Chinese Syllabary Pronounced According to the Dialect of Canton. Hong Kong: Chung Hwa Publishing. [in Chinese].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was assisted in part by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Leave Fellowship 451-84-2280 for the 1984–1985 academic year.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leong, C.K. What does accessing a morphemic script tell us about reading and reading disorders in an alphabetic script?. Annals of Dyslexia 36, 82–102 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648023
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648023