Skip to main content
Log in

T2-weighted breathold imaging of the liver: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of fast spin echo and half Fourier single shot fast spin echo imaging

  • Published:
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The imaging characteristics of two EPI-hybrid breath-hold sequences, T2-weighted fast spin-echo [FSE, effective echo time (TEeff) 138ms] and half Fourier single shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE, TEeff 60 ms), were compared in hepatic imaging.

A total of 111 patients with suspected hepatic disease were studied at 1.5 Tesla using a body phase-array coil. The signal-to-noise (S/N) and contrast-to-noise (C/N) ratios for organs and lesions were calculated and quantitatively compared. Organ delineation, visualization of anatomical structures and pathological lesions, artifacts, and total image quality were qualitatively assessed and statistically compared. The final diagnoses were metastases from colorectal, breast, and pancreatic cancer in 23/111, hepatocellular carcinoma in 15/111, cysts in 19/111, hemangiomas in 9/111, several other lesions in 7/111, and no lesions in 38/111 of the cases. A total of 139 lesion in 73% of the patients were seen while 85% of the lesions were at least 1.5 cm in size. Regarding S/Ns HASTE was significantly (P<0.03) superior to FSE with only minor (P>0.05) differences in C/Ns between the two sequences for anatomical and pathological structures. HASTE demonstrated in almost all (97.3%) of the cases no artifacts, while on fast SE imaging moderate to minor artifacts were present in 23.5–51.7% of the cases. The overall image quality and diagnostic confidence was rated significantly higher (good 43.2%, excellent 53.2%) for HASTE than for fast SE imaging (good 44.8%, excellent 17.6%). Providing comparable C/Ns for anatomical and pathological structures, breatheld HASTE imaging proved to be superior to fast SE in T2-weighted imaging of the upper abdomen regarding general image quality, and, with adequate technical prerequisites, may be a suitable substitute of fast T2-imaging techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Madore B, Henkelman RM. Motion artifacts in fast spin-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4(4):577–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Edelman RR, Wallner B, Singer A, Atkinson DJ, Saini S. Segmented turbo FLASH: method for breath-hold MR imaging of the liver with flexible contrast. Radiology 1990;177:515–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Whitney WS, Herfkens RJ, Jeffrey RB et al. Dynamic breath-hold multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging with gadolinium enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from malignancies at 1.5 T. Radiology 1993;189:863–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gauger J, Holzknecht NG, Lackerbauer CA, et al. Breathhold imaging of the upper abdomen using a circular polarized-array coil: comparison with standard body coil imaging. Magma 1996;4(2):93–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hennig J, Naureth A, Friedburg H. RARE imaging: a fast method for clinical MR. Magn Reson Med 1986;3:823–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Low RN, Hinks RS, Alzate GD, Shimakawa A. Fast spin-echo MR imaging of the abdomen: contrast optimization and artifact reduction. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4(5):637–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitchell DG, Outwater EK, Vinitski S. Hybrid RARE: implementations for abdominal MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4(2):109–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Melki PS, Argaud C, Suminski M, et al. Comparison of single-breath-hold fast spin-echo sequences with routine non-breath-hold techniques: application to MRI of renal masses. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6(4):608–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ito K, Mitchell DG, Outwater EK, Szklaruk J, Sadek AG. Hepatc lesions: Discrimination of nonsolid, bengn lesions from solid, malignant lesions with heavily T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging. Radiology 1997;204:729–37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Melki PS, Mulkern RV, Panych LP, Jolesz FA. Compairing the FAISE method with conventional dual-echo sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991;1:319–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Constable RT, Gore JC. The loss of small objects in variable TE imaging: implication for FASE, RARE, and EPI. Magn Reson Med 1992;28:9–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Outwater EK, Mitchell DG, Vinitski S. Abdominal MR imaging: evaluation of a fast spin-echo sequence. Radiology 1994;190(2):425–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Hoe L, Bosmans H, Aerts P, et al. Focal liver lesions: fast T2-weighted MR imaging with half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement. Radiology 1996;201:817–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Low RN, Alzate GD, Shimakawa A. Motion suppression in MR imaging of the liver: comparison of respiratory-triggered and nontriggered fast spin-echo sequences. Am J Roentgenol 1997;168(1):225–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Semelka RC, Shoenut JP, Kroeker RM. T2-weighted MR imaging of focal hepatic lesions: comparison of various RARE and fat-suppressed spin-echo sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:323–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reinig JW. Breath-hold fast spin-echo MR imaging of the liver: a technique for high-quality T2-weighted images. Radiology 1995;194:303–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rydberg JN, Lomas DJ, Coakley KJ, Hough DM, Ehman RL, Riederer SJ. Comparison of breath-hold fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo pulse sequences for T2-weighted MR imaging of liver lesions. Radiology 1995;194(2):431–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carpenter KD, Macaulay SE, Schulte SJ, et al. MR of focal liver lesions: comparison of breath-hold and non-breath-hold hybrid RARE and conventional Spin-Echo T2-weighted pulse sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:596–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamashita Y, Yamamoto H, Namimoto T, Abe Y, Takahashi M. Phased array breath-hold versus non-breath-hold MR imaging of focal liver lesions: a prospective comparative study. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:292–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Semelka RC, Kelekis NL, Thomasson D, Brown MA, Laub GA. HASTE MR imaging: description of technique and preliminary results in the abdomen. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:698–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamashita Y, Tang Y, Namimoto T, Mitsuzaki K, Takahashi M. MR imaging of the liver: Comparison between single-shot Echo-planar and half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences. Radiology 1998;207:331–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang Y, Yamashita Y, Namimoto T, Abe Y, Takahashi M. Liver T2-weighted MR imaging: comparison of fast and conventional half-Fourier singel shot turbo spin-echo, breath-hold turbo spin-echo, and respiratory-triggered turbo spin-echo sequences. Radiology 1997;203:766–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brinkmann G, Musiolik I, Kuhn B, et al. Ultra-rapid T2-weighted MR imaging during suspended respiration for the examination of focal lesions of the liver: a comparison of TSE, HASTE and HASTE-STIR sequences using a CP body array coil]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1998;168(4):330–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Coates GG, Borrello JA, McFarland EG, Mirowitz SA, Brown JJ. Hepatic T2-weighted MRI: a prospective comparison of sequences, including breath-hold, half-Fourier turbo spin echo (HASTE). J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8(3):642–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gaa J, Hatabu H, Jenkins RL, Finn JP, Edelman RR. Liver masses: replacement of conventional T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging with breath-hold MR imaging. Radiology 1996;200:459–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Soyer P, de Givry SC, Gueye C, Lenormand S, Somveille E, Scherrer A. Detection of focal hepatic lesions with MR imaging: prospective comparison of T2-weighted fast spin-echo with and without fat suppression, T2-weighted breath-hold fast spin-echo, and gadolinium chelate-enhanced 3D gradient-recalled imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1996;166(5):1115–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Soyer P, Le Normand S, de Givry SC, Gueye C, Somveille E, Scherrer A. T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging of the liver: breath-hold fast spin-echo versus non-breath-hold fast spin-echo images with and without fat suppression. Am J Roentgenol 1996;166(3):593–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Campeau NG, Johnson CD, Felmlee JP, et al. MR imaging of the abdomen with a phased-array multicoil: prospective clinical evaluation. Radiology 1995;195(3):769–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Parrish T, Xiaoping H. A new T2 preparation technique for ultrafast gradient-echo sequence. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:652–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Taupitz M, Speidel A, Hamm B, et al. T2-weighted breath-hold imaging of the liver at 1.5 T: results with three-dimensional steady-state free precession sequence in 87 patients. Radiology 1995;194:439–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Edelman RR, Wielopolki P, Schmitt F. Echo planar imaging. Radiology 1994;192:600–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Saini S, Reimer P, Hahn PF, Cohen MS. Echoplanar imaging of the liver in patients with focal hepatic lesions: quantitative analysis of images made with various pulse sequences. Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:1389–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tang Y, Yamashita Y, Namimoto T, Takahashi M. Characterization of focal liver lesions with half-fourier acquisition singleshot turbo-spin-echo (HASTE) and inversion recovery (IR)-HASTE sequences [In Process Citation]. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8(2):438–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tang Y, Yamashita Y, Takahashi M. Ultrafast T2-weighted imaging of the abdomen and pelvis: use of single shot fast spin-echo imaging [In Process Citation]. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8(2):384–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kiefer B, Grassner J, Hausmann R. Image acquisition in a second with half Fourier acquisition single shot turbo spin echo. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4:86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas K. Helmberger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helmberger, T.K., Schröder, J., Holzknecht, N. et al. T2-weighted breathold imaging of the liver: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of fast spin echo and half Fourier single shot fast spin echo imaging. MAGMA 9, 42–51 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02634591

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02634591

Keywords

Navigation