Summary
A prospective study was undertaken to compare the recurrent sites of breast cancer patients in Japan and the UK. The number of patients collected between April 1979 and August 1980 were 205 in the UK and 199 in Japan, of which those who had recurrence were 89 and 49 respectively.
A comparison of the distribution of the first recurrence sites demonstrated that the Japanese patients had significantly higher rates of local recurrence in the supraclavicular fossa and distant metastasis to the lung than UK patients.
When comparing the distribution of all recurrent sites seen in the study, Japanese patients showed a significantly higher incidence of metastasis to the supraclavicular fossa and the lung while the UK patients showed a significantly higher incidence of skin metastasis. Bone metastases were observed more often in Japanese patients and liver metastases in UK patients, but neither of the differences were statistically significant.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
Wynder EL, Kajitani T, Kuno K, Lucas JC, DePalo A, Farrow J: A comparison of survival rates between American and Japanese patients with breast cancer. Surg Gynecol Obstet 117: 196–200, 1963
Miura S: Follow-up survey after radical mastectomy. Jpn J Breast Cancer 4: 181–190, 1989 (in Japanese)
Hayward JL, Meakin JW, Stewart HJ: Assessment of response and recurrence in breast cancer. Semin Oncol 5: 445–449, 1978
Friedell GH, Soto EA, Kumaoka S, Abe O, Hayward JL, Bulbrook RD: Sinus histiocytosis in British and Japanese patients with breast cancer. Lancet ii: 1228–1229, 1974
Hayward JL, Rubens RD, Sexton S, Tong D, Bulbrook RD, Kumaoka S, Abe O, Takatani O, Yoshida M, Miura S, Murai H, Ariyoshi Y: The response to endocrine therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer in Great Britain and Japan. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 18: 1197–1204, 1982
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miura, S., Yoshida, M., Murai, H. et al. Patterns of recurrence and relapse — Anglo-Japanese comparative study. Breast Cancer Res Tr 18 (Suppl 1), S127–S130 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02633544
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02633544