Skip to main content
Log in

Invited commentary to: "Gamma nail vs. dynamic hip screw in 120 elderly patients — A randomized trial"

  • Originalarbeiten
  • Published:
Acta Chirurgica Austriaca Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Albareda J, Laderiga A, Palanca D, Paniagua L, Seral F: Complications and technical problems with the gamma nail. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 1996;20:47–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Calvert PT: The gamma nail — a significant advance or a passing fashion? J Bone Joint Surg 1992;73B:330–334.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huber SM, Heining SM, Euler E, Schweiberer L: Photoelastic stress measurement of the proximal femur — a biomechanical test model. Abstract, European Orthopaedic research society (EORS), 7th annual conference of EFORT, Barcelona, 1997.

  4. Kyle RF: Fractures of the proximal part of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 1994;76A:924–950.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kwasny O, Fuchs M: Die dynamische Hüftschraube zur Versorgung von per- und subtrochantären Oberschenkelfrakturen. Unfallchirurg 1991;94:430–435.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kukla C, Heinz T, Berger G, Kwasny O, Rosenberger A, Vescei V: Gamma Nail vs. Dynamic Hip Ccrew in 120 Elderly Patients — a Randomized Trial. Acta Chir Austriaca 1997;29:290–295.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Levy N, Ingles A jr, Klyver H, Iversen BF: Fracture of the femoral neck: optimal screw position and bone density determined by computertomography. Injury 1996;27:287–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lustenberger A, Bekic J, Ganz R: Rotationsinstabilität trochantärer Femurfrakturen fixiert mit der DHS. Eine radiologische Analyse. Unfallchirurg 1995;98:514–517.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Messmer P, Babst R, Regazzoni P: Der proximale Femurnagel (PFN). Ein neues Implantat. Swiss Surg Suppl 1997;1 (abstr).

  10. Parker MJ, Pryor GA: Gamma versus DHS nailing for extracapsular femoral fractures — Meta-analysis of ten randomized trials. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 1996;20:163–168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruckert R, Holzmann P, Buchmann P: Der neue Proximale Femurnagel (PFN) der AO — Erste Erfahrungen mit dem PFN in der Gerontotraumatologie. Swiss Surg Suppl 1997;1:55 (abstr).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seibert FJ, Szyszkowitz R, Schippinger G: Trauma und Traumafolgen. In Tschauner C (eds): Orthopädie der Hüfte. Stuttgart, Enke, 1997 (in print).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van den Brink WA, Janssen IMC: Failure of the gamma nail in a highly unstable proximal femur fracture: Report of four cases encountered in the netherlands. J Orthop Trauma 1995;9:53–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seibert, F.J., Schippinger, G. & Szyszkowitz, R. Invited commentary to: "Gamma nail vs. dynamic hip screw in 120 elderly patients — A randomized trial". Acta Chir Austriaca 29, 294–295 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02621325

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02621325

Keywords

Navigation