Summary and Conclusions
The physiology of fecal continence has been reviewed briefly. The functional results that have been reported following various sphincter-preserving operations have been reviewed and compared. Details of surgical technic, as they relate to the functional results, have been discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babcock, W. W.: The advantage of perineal over abdominal colostomy: With technic for transferring the abdominal opening to the perineum. J.A.M.A.113: 1933, 1939.
Babcock, W. W.: Correction of fecal incontinence from operations involving the terminal bowel. Am. J. Surg.79: 198, 1950.
Bacon, H. E.: Evolution of sphincter muscle preservation and re-establishment of continuity in the operative treatment of rectal and sigmoidal cancer. Surg., Gynec. & Obst.81: 113, 1945.
Bacon, H. E.: Abdominoperineal proctosigmoidectomy with sphincter preservation: Five-year and ten-year survival after “pull-through” operation for cancer of rectum. J.A.M.A.160: 628, 1956.
Bacon, H. E., J. P. Fleming, C. H. Smith and M. B. Holoman: The surgical treatment of cancer of the rectum and pelvic colon without colostomy and with preservation of sphincter muscles. J. Internat. Coll. Surgeons.9: 511, 1946.
Best, R. R.: Discussion. A.M.A. Arch. Surg.68: 481, 1954.
Black, B. M. and R. J. Botham: Combined abdominoendorectal resection for lesions of the mid and upper parts of the rectum. A.M.A. Arch. Surg.76: 688, 1958.
Courtney, H.: Anatomy of the pelvic diaphragm and anorectal musculature as related to sphincter preservation in anorectal surgery. Am. J. Surg.79: 155, 1950.
Denny-Brown, D. and E. G. Robertson: An investigation of the nervous control of defaecation. Brain.58: 256, 1935.
Dixon, C. F.: Anterior resection for malignant lesions of the upper part of the rectum and lower part of the sigmoid. Ann. Surg.128: 425, 1948.
Finsterer, Hans: Restitution of rectal continence after radical operation for carcinoma of the colon and rectum. J. Internat. Coll. Surgeons.14: 635, 1950.
Garry, R. C.: The nervous control of the caudal region of the large bowel in the cat. J. Physiol.77: 422, 1932–33.
Gaston, E. A.: The physiology of fecal continence. Surg., Gynec. & Obst.87: 280, 1948.
Gaston, E. A.: Fecal continence following resections of various portions of the rectum with preservation of the anal sphincters. Surg., Gynec. & Obst.87: 669, 1948.
Gaston, E. A.: Physiological basis for preservation of fecal continence after resection of rectum. J.A.M.A.146: 1486, 1951.
Gerst, G. R. and B. Seidenberg: Experiences with a sphincter-preserving operation: Its use in the treatment of carcinomatous polyp of the rectum. A.M.A. Arch. Surg.73: 63, 1956.
Goligher, J. C.: The functional results after sphincter-saving resections of the rectum. Ann. Roy. Coll. Surgeons, England.8: 421, 1951.
Goligher, J. C. and E. S. R. Hughes: Sensibility of the rectum and colon: Its role in the mechanism of anal continence. Lancet.1: 543, 1951.
Hertz, A. F.: The sensibility of the alimentary canal in health and disease. Lancet.1: 1051; 1119; 1187, 1911.
Karlan, Mitchell, R. C. McPherson and R. N. Watman: An experimental evaluation of fecal continence—sphincter and reservoir—in the dog. Surg., Gynec. & Obst.108: 469, 1959.
Milligan, E. T. C. and C. N. Morgan: Surgical anatomy of the anal canal: With special reference to anorectal fistulae. Lancet.2: 1150, 1934.
Munro, Donald: The rehabilitation of patients totally paralyzed below the waist, with special reference to making them ambulatory and capable of earning their own living. IV. Control of bowel emptying. New England J. Med.248: 43, 1953.
Nickel, W. F., Jr., and A. I. Chenoweth: Resection of the rectum with preservation of the anal sphincter. Surgery.23: 480, 1948.
Ravitch, M. M.: Anal ileostomy with sphincter preservation in patients requiring total colectomy for benign conditions. Surgery.24: 170, 1948.
Roux, Cesar: Resection of the rectum and colon through the anal sphincter: Postoperative results. Practitioner.118: 284, 1927.
Swenson, Orvar: Follow up on 200 patients treated for Hirschsprung’s disease during a ten-year period. Ann. Surg.146: 706, 1957.
Wangensteen, O. H.: Primary resection (closed anastomosis) of rectal ampulla for malignancy with preservation of sphincteric function together with a further account of primary resection of the colon and rectosigmoid and a note on excision of hepatic metastases. Surg., Gynec. & Obst.81: 1, 1945.
Waugh, J. M., E. M. Miller and F. T. Kurzweg: Abdominoperineal resection with sphincter preservation for carcinoma of the midrectum. A.M.A. Arch. Surg.68: 469, 1954.
Welch, C. S. and H. F. Rheinlander: Radical abdominal proctosigmoidectomy with preservation of the anal sphincter. Surg., Gynec. & Obst.94: 550, 1952.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Read at the meeting of the American Proctologic Society, Houston, Texas, April 25 to 27, 1960.
About this article
Cite this article
Gaston, E.A. Functional results that follow sphincter-preserving operations for cancer of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 3, 210–218 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02616556
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02616556