Abstract
A study of the first four moments of the log likelihood ratio statistic suggests that a transformed Beta ranks as a serious competitor to the Chi-square as an approximating distribution for certain multinomials. An error analysis of the series approximations of these moments indicates that the equiprobable case is not of sufficient generality for the study of multinomial type statistics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker GA Jr (1975) Essentials of Padé approximants. Academic Press, New York
Bouver H, Bargmann RE (1975) Computational algorithms and modules for the evaluation of statistical distribution functions. University of Georgia, Department of Statistics and Computer Science. Technical Report Number 110
Chapman JW (1976) A comparison of theX 2, −2 logR and multinomial probability criteria for significance tests when expected frequencies are small. Journal of the American Statistical Association 71:845–863
Craig CC (1936) A new exposition and chart for the Pearson system of frequency curves. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 7:16–28
Fisher RA (1938) Statistical methods for research workers, 7th ed. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh London
Good IJ (1953) The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika 40:237–264
Good IJ, Gover TM, Mitchel GJ (1970) Exact distributions forX 2 and for the likelihood ratio statistic for the equiprobable multinomial distribution. Journal of the American Statistical Association 65:267–283
Hutcheson K (1977) Some exact moments of minus twice the logarithm of the likelihood ratio for multinomial distributions. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 6:149–152
Hutcheson K, Lyons NI (1979) The mean and variance of the likelihood ratio criterion for the multinomial distribution. Metrika 26:57–61
Kallenberg WCM, Oosterhoff J, Schriever BF (1985) The number of classes in chi-squared goodness-of-fit tests. Journal of the American Statistical Association 80:959–968
Koehler KJ, Larntz K (1980) An empirical investigation of goodness of fit statistics for sparse multinomials. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75:336–342
Larntz K (1978) Small sample comparisons of exact levels for chi-squared goodness of fit statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 73:253–263
Neyman J, Pearson ES (1931) Further notes on theX 2 distribution. Biometrika 22:296–305
Neyman J (1949) Contributions to the theory of theX 2-test. Proceedings of the Berkeley Symposium, pp 239–273
Pearson K (1900) On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philosophical Magazine. No 5. 50:157–172
Schäffer KA (1957) The likelihood test for fit. Mittbl Math Statistic 9:27–54
Shenton LR, Bowman KO (1977) Maximum likelihood estimation in small samples. MacMillan, New York
Smith PJ, Rae DS, Manderscheid RW, Silbergeld S (1981) Approximating the moments and distribution of the likelihood ratio statistic for multinomial goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association 76:737–740
Sugg MN, Hutcheson K (1976) Gauss-Krawtchouk quadrature approximations for moments of multinomial type distributions. Biometrika 63:395–400
Uppuluri VR, Rao, Bowman KO (1966) Likelihood ratio test criterion for small samples from multinomial distributions. ORNL-3991
West EN, Kempthorne O (1972) A comparison of the Chi2 and likelihood ratio tests for composite alternatives. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 1:1–33
Wilks SS (1938) The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 9:60–62
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was partially supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under grant number AFOSR-85-0161.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lyons, N.I., Hutcheson, K. & Sugg, M.N. A small sample study of the moments and distribution of the log likelihood ratio statistic. Metrika 36, 195–207 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614092
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614092