Skip to main content
Log in

Vergleich der Verfahren zur Herstellung von Hartplatten: Naß-, Halbtrocken- und Trockenverfahren

Evaluation of different hardboard processes: Wet, semi-dry, and dry process

  • Published:
Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The present paper describes the American dry method, the Czechoslovak glueless dry method, and the semi-dry method for the production of fibreboard, and gives an evaluation of these methods as compared to the wet process. This comparative evaluation is concerned with the following factor, water economy, raw material, and glues, technological problems, quality and type of fibreboard, and some technical and economic aspects of production. Summarizing, it can be said that the semi-dry process does not eliminate the problem of waste waters and, therefore, cannot have a promising future. Due to recent improvements in the technological and machinery field, there are very good prospects for the dry process to gain in importance equal to the wet process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swiderski, J. Vergleich der Verfahren zur Herstellung von Hartplatten: Naß-, Halbtrocken- und Trockenverfahren. Holz als Roh-und Werkstoff 21, 217–225 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02609726

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02609726

Navigation