Skip to main content
Log in

Gastroenterology consultations from the internal medicine physician’s perspective

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective:To examine the patterns of use of gastroenterology consultations by internal medicine physicians.

Design:A survey of licensed physicians in the three metropolitan areas in Arizona where gastroenterologists are available. The physicians were asked how likely they were to obtain gastroenterology consultations for a variety of different gastrointestinal illnesses. Comparisons between groups were done with chi-square analysis.

Measurements and main results:Forty-six percent of the physicians responded. The majority of respondents believed that esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy should be available without gastroenterology consultation (65% and 64%, respectively). Physicians in practice more than ten years were less prone to request consultations for gastrointestinal complaints that were likely to result in endoscopic procedures, such as the diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease or inflammatory bowel disease, or guaiac-positive stool. Internal medicine residents were more likely to seek consultations for both endoscopic and cognitive gastrointestinal complaints. Internal medicine residents were far more likely to request gastroenterology consultations for most patients with upper-gastrointestinal-tract bleeding (91% vs. 60%, p<0.001) and lower-gastrointestinal-tract bleeding (65% vs. 22%, p<0.0001) than were internists practicing more than ten years.

Conclusions:The majority of internal medicine physicians would like to order endoscopic procedures without gastroenterology consultations, much as they order radiography. Recently trained physicians are far more likely to request consultants for procedure-related problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DiSario JA, Waring JP, Sanowski RA, Wadas DD. Gastroenterologist: physician or technician? Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:315–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Standards of practice of gastrointestinal endoscopy. 1986. Publication No. 1004.

  3. Kahn KL, Kosecoff J, Chassin MR, Solomon DH, Brook RH. The use and misuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 1988;109:664–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Overholt BF, Hargrove L, Farris RK, Porter R. Primary panendoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1987;33:1–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goy JA, Herold E, Jenkins PJ, Colman JC, Russell DM. “Open-access” endoscopy for general practitioners. Med J Aust. 1986;144:71–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gear MWL, Barnes RJ. Endoscopic studies of dyspepsia in a general practice. Br Med J. 1980;281:1136–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fleischer DE, Goldberg SB, Browning TH, et al. Detection and surveillance of colorectal cancer. JAMA. 1989;261:580–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waring, J.P., DiSario, J.A. & Sanowski, R.A. Gastroenterology consultations from the internal medicine physician’s perspective. J Gen Intern Med 6, 436–438 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598166

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598166

Key words

Navigation