Skip to main content
Log in

Convergence analysis of the projective scaling algorithm based on a long-step homogeneous affine scaling algorithm

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we give a new convergence analysis of a projective scaling algorithm. We consider a long-step affine scaling algorithm applied to a homogeneous linear programming problem obtained from the original linear programming problem. This algorithm takes a fixed fraction λ≤2/3 of the way towards the boundary of the nonnegative orthant at each iteration. The iteration sequence for the original problem is obtained by pulling back the homogeneous iterates onto the original feasible region with a conical projection, which generates the same search direction as the original projective scaling algorithm at each iterate. The recent convergence results for the long-step affine scaling algorithm by the authors are applied to this algorithm to obtain some convergence results on the projective scaling algorithm. Specifically, we will show (i) polynomiality of the algorithm with complexities of O(nL) and O(n 2 L) iterations for λ<2/3 and λ=2/3, respectively; (ii) global covnergence of the algorithm when the optimal face is unbounded; (iii) convergence of the primal iterates to a relative interior point of the optimal face; (iv) convergence of the dual estimates to the analytic center of the dual optimal face; and (v) convergence of the reduction rate of the objective function value to 1−λ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. Adler and R.D.C. Monteiro, “Limiting behavior of the affine scaling continuous trajectories for linear programming problems,”Mathematical Programming 50 (1991) 29–51.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. K.M. Anstreicher, “A monotonic projective algorithm for fractional linear programming,”Algorithmica 1 (1986) 483–498.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. K.M. Anstreicher, “The worst-case step in Karmarkar's algorithm,”Mathematics of Operations Research 14 (1989) 294–302.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. K.M. Anstreicher, “On the performance of Karmarkar's algorithm over a sequence of iterations,”SIAM Journal on Optimization 1 (1991) 22–29.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. E.R. Barnes “A variation on Karmarkar's algorithm for solving linear programming problems,”Mathematical Programming 36 (1986) 174–182.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. D.A. Bayer and J.C. Lagarias, “The nonlinear geometry of linear programming: I. Affine and projective trajectories,”Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 314 (1989) 499–526.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. I.I. Dikin, “Iterative solution of problems of linear and quadratic programming,”Soviet Mathematics Doklady 8 (1967) 674–675.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. I.I. Dikin, “The convergence of dual variables,” Technical Report., Siberian Energy Institute, Irkutsk (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.M. Gay, “A variant of Karmarkar's linear programming algorithm for problems in standard form,”Mathematical Programming 37 (1987) 81–90.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. C.C. Gonzaga “Conical projection algorithms for linear programming,”Mathematical Programming 43 (1989) 151–173.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. N. Karmarkar, “A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming,”Combinatorica 4 (1984) 373–395.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. C. McDiarmid, “On the improvement per iteration in Karmarkar's algorithm for linear programming,”Mathematical Programming 46 (1990) 299–320.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. R.D.C. Monteiro, T. Tsuchiya and Y. Wang, “A simplified global convergence proof of the affine scaling algorithm,”Annals of Operations Research 7 (1993) 443–482.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu.E. Nesterov and M.J. Todd, Self-scaled barriers and interior-point methods for convex programming,” Technical Report, School of OR/IE. Cornell University Ithaca, NY (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Saigal, A simple proof of primal affine scaling method,” Technical Report, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.J. Todd, “Potential reduction methods in mathematical programming,” Technical Report, School of OR/IE, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M.J. Todd and B.P. Burrell, “An extension of Karmarkar's algorithm for linear programming using dual variables,”Algorithmica 1 (1986) 409–424.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Tsuchiya and M. Muramatsu, “Global convergence of a long-step affine scaling algorithm for degenerate linear programming problems,”SIAM Journal on Optimization 5 (1995) 525–551.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. R.J. Vanderbei and J.C. Lagarias, “I.I. Dikin's convergence result for the affine-scaling algorithm,”Contemporary Mathematics 114 (1990) 109–119.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. R.J. Vanderbei, M.S. Meketon and B.A. Freedman, “A modification of Karmarkar's linear programing algorithm,”Algorithmica 1 (1986) 395–407.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Ye and M. Kojima, “Recovering optimal dual solutions in Karmarkar's polynomial algorithm for linear programming,”Mathematical Programming 39 (1987) 305–317.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masakazu Muramatsu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muramatsu, M., Tsuchiya, T. Convergence analysis of the projective scaling algorithm based on a long-step homogeneous affine scaling algorithm. Mathematical Programming 72, 291–305 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02592094

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02592094

Keywords

Navigation