Summary
A comparative study of two methods of managing left colostomy (irrigation and natural evacuation) was carried out on 340 patients who were examined and interviewed at the Stoma Rehabilitation Clinic of the Institute of Surgical Pathology of the University of Padua.
Ninety-two per cent of patients who irrigated their colostomies gained fecal continence. No patient who irrigated his colostomy had any cutaneous problem, and this group had significantly better results in preventing leakage of gas and odors compared with those patients using natural evacuation. For most patients who irrigated, the ability to predict or control bowel movements overcame fears of “being dirty” and related psychological problems. These patients also had more normal social and working lives than did those patients not irrigating their colostomies.
Only one patient in our series had a colonic perforation, and any chance of a repeat incident will probably disappear with the cone-shaped catheters now available.
The authors conclude that in properly selected patients, irrigation is the method of choice for management of left colostomy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amdrup E, Christensen P: Colostomy care: Natural evacuation or irrigation? Am J Dig Dis 12: 747, 1967
Benfield JR, Fowler E, Barrett PV: Enterostomal therapy. Arch Surg 107: 62, 1973
Biermann HJ, Tocker AM, Tocker LR: Statistical survey of problems in patients with colostomy or ileostomy. Am J Surg 112: 647, 1966
Dukes CE: Management of a permanent colostomy: Study of 100 patients at home. Lancet 2: 12, 1947
Editorial: Living with a colostomy. Br Med J 1: 274, 1957
Editorial: Colostomy and the pateint. Br Med J 1: 448, 1958
Feustel H, Henning G: Kontinent Kolostomie durch Magnet-verschluss. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 100: 1063, 1975
Gabriel WB: Discussion on the management of the permanent colostomy. Proc R Soc Med 38: 692, 1945
Grier WR, Postel AH, Syarse A, et al: An evaluation of colonic stoma management without irrigations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 118: 1234, 1964
Jeter K, Bertsch RJ: Enterostomal therapy: Better care for the ostomy patient. Am Surg 39: 124, 1973
Kock NG, Geroulanos S, Hahnloser P, et al: Continent colostomy: An experimental study in dogs. Dis Colon Rectum 17: 727, 1974
Laird DR: A colostomy safety tip. Dis Colon Rectum 12: 59, 1969
Lenneberg E: Role of enterostomal therapists and stoma rehabilitation clinics. Cancer 28: 226, 1971
Lyons AS: Control of the colostomy. Am J Dig Dis 1: 79, 1956
MacLeod JH: Colostomy irrigation—a transatlantic controversy. Dis Colon Rectum 15: 357, 1972
Mazier WP, Dignan RD, Capehart RJ, et al.: Effective colostomy irrigation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 142: 905, 1976
Pryse-Phillips W: Follow-up study of patients with colostomies. Am J Surg 122: 27, 1971
Rowbotham JL: Current concepts: Stomal care. N Engl J Med 279: 90, 1968
Rowbotham JL: Colostomy problems—dietary and colostomy management. Cancer 28: 222, 1971
Schauder MR: Ostomy care. Am J Nurs 74: 1424, 1974
Seargeant PW: Colostomy management by the irrigation technique: Review of 165 cases. Br Med J 2: 25, 1966
Terranova O, Sandei F, Bortolozzi E, et al: Sulla istituzione di un servizio per enterostomizzati. Acta Chir Ital 33: 354, 1977
Terranova O, Sandei F, Rebuffat C, et al: Tecnica dell'irrigazione nel colostomizzato. Acta Chir Ital 33: 472, 1977
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Terranova, O., Sandei, F., Rebuffat, C. et al. Irrigationvs. natural evacuation of left colostomy: A comparative study of 340 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 22, 31–34 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02586753
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02586753