Abstract
A number of limitations have contributed to long-standing problems of inappropriate categorization of children and inadequately defined populations in special education practice and research. Diagnostic ambiguity and overlap of categories have served to complicate communication about individual children and the design of appropriate interventions. There is a need for functional approaches to document child characteristics which build on conceptual models of disability and yield consistent terminology. This study examines the usefulness of assessing children's functional abilities as an alternative to existing categorical classifications in special education. The ABILITIES Index, a functional measure encompassing the domains of audition, behavior/social skills, intellectual functioning, limbs, intentional communication, tonicity, integrity of health, eyes, and structural status was scored for 108 children with disabilities receiving intervention services in center-based public preschools. Profiles for children revealed substantial intra and inter-individual variability. Exploratory hierarchical cluster analysis yielded a six-factor solution of subgroups sharing similar ability/disability profiles. Results supported the potential utility of an approach focusing on the classification of child characteristics rather than classification of children. Further research is needed to examine the utility of the ABILITIES Index to complement other assessment data in order to personalize intervention plans.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey, D. B., Simeonsson, R. J., Buysse, V., and Smith, T. (1993). Reliability of an index of child characteristics.Devel. Med. Child Neurol. 35: 806–815.
Batavia, A. (1992). Assessing the function of functional assessment: A consumer perspective.Disabil. Rehabil. 14(3): 156–160.
Brynelsen, O., and Holm, M. (1988). The early recognition and education of the FAS child. In G. C. Robinson and R. W. Armstrong (eds.),Alcohol and Child/Family Health, British Columbia Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Resource Group, Vancouver, B. C., pp. 70–86.
Buysse V., Smith, T., Bailey, D. B., and Simeonsson, R. J. (1992). Consumer validation of an index characterizing the functional abilities of young children with disabilities.J. Early Interven. 17(3):224–238.
Eaves, L. C., Ho, H. H., and Eaves, D. M. (1994). Subtype of autism by cluster analysis.J. Aut. Dev. Disord. 24(1):3–22.
Frattali, C. M. (1993). Perspectives on functional assessment: Its use for policy making.Disabil. Rehabil. 15(1):1–9.
Gorter, K. A. (1993). Survey methods for the assessment of physical disability among children.Disabil. Rehabil. 15(1):47–51.
Hirst, M., and Cooke, K. (1988). Grading severity of childhood disablement: Comparing survey measures with a pediatrician's assessment.Child: Care Health Devel. 14:111–126.
Hobbs, N. (1978). Classification options.Except. Child. 44: 494–497.
Hobbs, N. (1975).The Futures of Children, Jossey Bass, San Francisco.
Holt, K. S. (1957). A suggested medical classification of handicapped children.Arch. Dis. Child. 32: 226–229.
Holt K. S. (1977).Developmental Pediatrics: Perspectives and Practice, Butterworth, London.
Horn, S. D., Cashick, B., and Clayton, C. (1980). Measuring severity of illness: A reliability study.Med. Care 21: 705–714.
Horn, S. D., and Horn, R. A. (1986). Reliability and validity of the Severity of Illness Index.Med. Care 24(2): 159–178.
Iscoe, I., and Payne, S. (1972) Development of a revised scale for the functional classification of exceptional children. In E. P. Trapp and P. Himelstein (eds.).Readings on Exceptional Children: Research and Theory, Appleton Century Crofts, New York.
Korpela, C. A., and Kiovikko, M. J. (1992). A regional survey of technical aids used by handicapped children in day care and at school.Disabil. Rehabil. 14(1):16–22.
Lindon, R. L. (1963). The Pultibec system for the medical assessment of handicapped children.Devel. Med. Child Neurol. 5:125–145.
Porter, B., Goldstein, E., Galil, A., and Carel, C. (1992). Diagnosing the strange child.Child Care Health Devel. 18: 57–63.
Reynolds, M. C., Zetlin, A. G., and Wang, M. C. (1993). 20/20 analysis: Taking a close look at the margins.Except. Child. 59(4): 294–300.
Simeonsson, R. J. (1986).Psychological and Developmental Assessment of Special Children, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
Simeonsson, R. J., and Bailey, D. B. (1988). Essential elements of the assessment process. In T. D. Wachs and R. Sheehan (eds.),Assessment of Young Developmentally Disabled Children, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 25–42.
Simeonsson, R. J., Chen, J., and Hu, Y. (1994). Functional assessment of Chinese children using the ABILITIES Index.Disabil. Rehabil. (in press).
Simeonsson, R. J., Huntington, G. S., and Parse, S. A. (1980). Assessment of children with severe handicaps: Multiple problems, multivariate goals.J. Assoc Severely Hand. 5: 55–72.
Stein, R. E., and Jessop, R. E. K. (1983). A noncategorical approach to chronic childhood illness.Pub. Health Rep. 97: 354–362.
Stein, R. E. K., and Jessop, D. J. (1989). What diagnosis does not tell: The case for a noncategorical approach to chronic illness in childhood.Social Sci. Med. 29(6): 769–778.
Thorburn, M. J., Desai, P., and Davidson, L. L. (1992). Categories, classes and criteria in childhood disability—experience from a survey in Jamaica.Disabil. Rehabil. 14(3): 122–132.
World Health Organization (1980).International Classification of Impairment, Disabilities and Handicaps, Geneva: Author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simeonsson, R.J., Bailey, D., Smith, T. et al. Young children with disabilities: Functional assessment by teachers. J Dev Phys Disabil 7, 267–284 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02578431
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02578431