Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of midline crossing on response processing of adults with mental retardation

  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In normal development, midline crossing inhibition (MCI) generally disappears by age nine. Individuals with mental retardation exhibit developmental delays which are manifested as failure to attain motor milestones. This study utilized a new methodology predicated upon a response processing model to measure MCI in 20 adults with moderate mental retardation. A chronologically equivalent group of individuals with mental retardation served as the control group. Measurements of reaction time (RT) and movement time were recorded as a subject performed ipsilateral, midline and contra-lateral movements. The rationale behind this experiment was that crossing midline to the contralateral side constituted a more complex task, requiring more response processing time and longer RTs. Analysis of the RT revealed inhibitory responses in the subjects with mental retardation when movements were made in a contralateral direction with the preferred hand. No inhibition was manifested by the subjects in the control group. This new method of assessing MCI detected this phenomenon with subjects who were mentally retarded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anson, J. G. (1982). Memory drum theory: Alternative tests and explanations for the complexity effects on simple reaction time.J. Motor Behav., 14: 228–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, R. E., MacLean, W. E., and Baumeister, A. A. (1988). Critique of sensory integration theory and its application in mental retardation.Am. J. Ment. Retard., 92: 401–411.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Auxter, P., and Pyfer, J. (1985)Adapted Physical Education and Recreation, Times Mirror/Mosby, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, A. J. (1972).Southern California Sensory Integration Tests, Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, A., Wilcox, S., and Greeson, J. (1969) Reaction time of retardates and normals as a function of relative stimulus frequency.Am. J. Ment. Def. 73: 935–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, R. J., Andriacchi, T. P., Kuo, K. N., Fermier, R. W., and Galante, J. O. (1983). Changes in the gait patterns of growing children.J. Bone Joint Surg. 63: 1452–1457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, A. (1955). Right left discrimination and finger localization in defective children.Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry, 74: 583–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, N., and Nettelbeck, T. (1977). Influence of contextual cues on the choice reaction time of midly retarded adults.Am. J. Ment. Def., 82: 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunt, D., Housner, L., and McElroy, J. (1983). The manipulation of dominant/non-dominant hand and ipsilateral/contralateral movement as a function of response organization in fourth grade children.Percept. Motor Skills, 56: 331–334.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, B. H., and Michael, B. T. (1986). Performance of retarded children, with and with without Down Syndrome, on the Bruininks Oseretsky test of motor proficiency.Phys. Ther., 66: 344–348.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W.E., Sparrow, W. A., and Ward, T. (1991). Fractionated reaction times and movement times of Down Syndrome and other adults with mental retardation.Adapt. Phys. Act. Quart., 8: 221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, H., Kilani, H., Moustafa, E., Hamilton, N., and Herbert, J. P. (1987). Effect of head-neck position on elbow flexor muscle torque production.Phys. Ther., 67: 517–521.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Distefano, E. A., and Brunt, D. (1982). Mentally retarded and normal children's performance on gross motor reaction—and movement—time tasks with varying degrees of uncertainty of movement.Percept. Motor Skills, 55: 1235–1236.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eason, R. L., Brandon, J. E., Smith, T. L., and Serpas, D. C. (1986). Relaxation training effects on reaction/response time, frontalis EMG and behavioral measures of relaxation with hyperactive males.Adapt. Phys. Act. Quart., 3: 329–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eason, R. L., and Surburg, P. R. (1990, June).Effects of midline crossing on reaction and response time of mentally retarded subjects, Paper presented at the annual conference of the North American Society for the Psycholog of Sport and Physical Activity. Houston, TX.

  • Fairweather, H., and Hutt, S. J. (1978). On the rate of gain of information in children.J. Exp. Child Psychol. 26: 216–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorentino, M. R. (1973).Reflex Testing Methods for Evaluating CNS Development (Second edition), Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, H., and Jenness, D. (1974). Temporal variables in simple reaction times of mentally retarded boys.Am. J. Ment. Def., 79: 214–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, W. F., Baumeister, A. A., and Holland, J. M. (1965). Reaction time in retardates following variation in warning signal intensity and preparatory interval.Am. J. Ment. Def. 70: 135–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry F. (1961). Reaction time—movement time correlation.Percep. Motor Skills 41: 63–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, F. M., and Rodgers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reactions.Res. Quart. 31: 448–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkins, J. (1963). Reaction time and speed of movement in males and females of various ages.Res. Quart. 34: 335–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, J. H., Wade, M. G., and Newell, K. M. (1981). Training moderately and severely mentally retarded adults to improve reaction and movement times.Am. J. Ment. Def. 85: 389–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joubert, C. E., and Baumeister, A. A. (1970). Effects of varying the length and frequency of response—stimulus interval on reaction times of normals and mentally deficient subjects.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 73: 105–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, S. T., Wyatt, E. P., and MacLingo, W. (1974). Response programming in simple and choice reactions.J. Motor Behav. 6: 263–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupski, A. (1977). Role of attention in the reaction—time performance of mentally retarded adolescents,Am. J. Ment. Def. 82: 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, M., Ball, T., and Edgar, C. L. (1970). Analysis of the generalizability of sensory—motor training,Am. J. Ment. Def., 74: 458–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhern, T., and Baumeister, A. A. (1971). Effects of stimulus—response compatibility and complexity upon reaction times of normals and retardates.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 75: 459–463.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porretta, D. (1987). Selected parameters of response organization in mildly mentally retarded children.Percept. Motor Skills 64: 95–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, M. A., and Spirduso, W. W. (1991). Age-related differences in response programming.Res. Quart. Exercise Sport 62: 178–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, M. A. (1984). Changing motor patterns during childhood. In Thomas, J. R. (ed.),Motor Development During Childhood and Adolescence, Burgess, Minneapolis, pp. 48–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. A. (1988).Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis (second edition), Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, W. (1976). Do children find movements which cross the midline difficult?Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 28: 571–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surburg, P. R. (1991). Preparation process facilitation of a motor task through imagery practice with adolescents who have mental retardation.Am. J. Ment. Retard. 95: 428–434.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. R. (1980). Acquisition of motor skills: Information processing differences between children and adults.Res. Quart. Exercise Sport 51: 158–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M. G., Newell, K. M., and Wallace, S. A. (1978). Decision time and movement time as a function of response time complexity in retarded persons,Am. J. Ment. Def. 83: 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wapner, S., and Cirillo, L. (1968). Imitation of a model's hand movements: Age changes in transposition of left—right relations.Child Develop. 39: 887–894.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelaznik, H. N., and Aufderheide, S. K. (1986). Attentional and reaction time analysis of performance: Implications for research with mentally handicapped individuals. In Wade M. G. (ed.),Motor-Skill Acquisition of the Mentally Handicapped: Issues in Research and Training, Amsterdam, North Holland, pp. 131–153.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Surburg, P.R., Johnston, J. & Eason, B.L. Effects of midline crossing on response processing of adults with mental retardation. J Dev Phys Disabil 6, 327–338 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02578419

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02578419

Key Words

Navigation