Skip to main content
Log in

Taxonomy of rights: A proposed classification system of rights for individuals with mental retardation or developmental disabilities

  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, two bill of rights documents (The Rights of Mentally Retarded or Developmentally Disabled Persons—1987 and Community Health Accreditation Program Client Bill of Rights—1993) will be conflated into one categorically coherent whole. Second, unlike listing rights randomly, these rights will actually be classified into a Maslowian framework reflecting a hierarchy of needs. Theoretical groundwork and various functional benefits of such a taxonomic system of rights for individuals with mental retardation or developmental disabilities will be enumerated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • The Accreditation Council on Services for People with Disabilities—ACD (1993).Outcome Based Performance Measures, Landover, Maryland: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association on Mental Retardation (1992).Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of support (ninth edition), Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Hospital Association (1973). Statement on a patient's bill of rights.Hospitals 47: 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annas, G. J. (1978). Patient's' rights movement. In Reich, W. T. (ed.),Encyclopedia of Bioethics (Vol. 3), Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annas, G. J. (ed.) (1989).The Rights of Patients: The Basic ACLU Guide to Patient Rights (second edition), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backlar, P. (1995). Will the “age of bureaucracy” silence the rights versus needs debate? Special section: Ethics in community mental health care.Comm. Ment. Health J. 31(3): 201–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bootzin, R. R., and Acocella, J. R. (1988).Abnormal Psychology: Current Perspectives (fifth edition), Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellers, K. (1995). Integrated QA systems: Marrying core QA systems and TQM philosophies. InASQC 49th Annual Quality Congress Proceedings. A Milwaukee, WI, SQC, p. 597–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, A. J., Vinci, Y., and Mumm, A. M. (1993). Special needs and family day care: Problems and promise.Infants Young Children 6(2): 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friel, J. (1995).Children with Special Needs: Assessment, Law and Practice—Caught in the Acts (third edition), Jessica Kingsley, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. F., and Chapman, M. S. (1985).Staff Development in Mental Retardation Services: A Practical Handbook, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, A. (1992). Human dignity as the basis of rights. In. Meyer, M. J., and Parent, W. A. (eds.),The Constitution of Rights: Human Dignity and American Values. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 10–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, M. W. (1980). An alternative definition of mental retardation. In Gold, M. W. (ed.),Did I say that? Articles and Commentary on the Try Another Way System, Research Press, Champaign, IL, p. 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeman, S. P., and Repetto, M. A. (1992). Legislation and children with special needs from 1993 to 1990.West. J. Nurs. Res. 14(1): 102–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.Doctrine of Virtue, part II, Translated by M. J. Gregor (1964), Harper Torchbooks, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. (1990). Conservation and integrity. In Parker, M. E. (ed.),Nursing Theories in Practice, National League of Nursing, New York, pp. 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. J. (1986).Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research (second edition), Urban and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore-Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, R. J. (ed.) (1979).The Journals of A. H. Maslow (Vol. I), Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckasson, R., Coulter, D. L., Polloway, E. A., Reiss, S., Schalock, R. L., Snell, M. E., Spitalnik, D. M., and Stark, J. A. (1992).Mental Retardation: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports, American Association on Mental Retardation, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, D. L., Gresham, and Siperstein, G. N. (1983). Conceptual and psychometric concerns about the 1992 AAMR definition on mental retardation.Am. J. Ment. Retard. 98(3): 325–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mano, D. M., and Block, S. (1994). Diagnosis and management of special populations: The role of the developmental optometrist.J. Optemetric Vision Devel. 25(4): 219–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1991).Motivation and Personality, Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1991).Equality and Partiality, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • National League for Health Care, Inc. and Community Health Accreditation Program, Inc. (1993).CHAP Client Bill of Rights New York: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohio Department of Mental Retardation (1987).The Rights of Mentally Retarded or Developmentally Disabled Persons (Ohio Revised Code, Section 5123.62), Columbus, Ohio: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrosky, M. M., and Kaiser, A. P. (1995). The effects of a peer-mediated intervention on the social communicative interactions between children with and without special needs. Special Issue: Tom Haring Memorial Issue: IIJ. Behav. Ed. 5(2): 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, J. R., Beirne-Smith, M., and Payne, J. S. (1990).Mental Retardation (third edition), Merrill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, D. J. (1987). Ethics and human experimentation.New Engl. J. Med. 317: 1195–1199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, D. J. (1991).Strangers at the Bedside, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, M. C. (1984). Assessing competency for informed consent with mentally retarded minors.Pediatr. Nurs. 10(4): 261–265, 306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanhope, M., and Lancaster, J. (1996).Community Health Nursing: Promoting Health of Aggregates, Families, and Individuals (fourth edition), Mosby, St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout-Shaffer, S., and Larrabee, J. (1992). Everyone can be a visionary leader.Nursing Manag. 23(12): 54–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald, P. M. (1976). Basic personal and civic rights. In Kindred, M., Cohen, J., Penrod, D., and Shaffer, T. (eds.),The Mentally Retarded Citizen and the Law. Free Press, New York, pp. 2–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schultz, G.S. Taxonomy of rights: A proposed classification system of rights for individuals with mental retardation or developmental disabilities. J Dev Phys Disabil 8, 275–285 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02578395

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02578395

Key words

Navigation