Abstract
A case is reported of a negative pressure-flow study in a patient with intermittent hydronephorosis. This is the first known report of a properly performed pressure-flow study failing to diagnose obstruction due to the intermittent nature of the obstruction itself. This case also supports the concept that the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) can be intrinsically normal in patients with intermittent hydronephrosis secondary to a crossing renal vessel. It also reaffirms the need to study these patients while they are symptomatic.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nesbit RU (1956) Diagnosis of intermittent hydronephrosis. Importance of pyelography during episodes of pain. J Urol 75:767–771
Lementowska T, Nogrady MB, Nearing TN (1970) Intermittent hydronephrosis: A case report demonstrated with overhydration during urography. Can Assoc Radiol J 21:102–104
Ansll JS, Paterson JRS (1962) Intermittent hydronephrosis. Med Intel 267:447–448
Jaffe RB, Middleton AW (1980) Whitaker test: Differentiation of obstructive and nonobstructive uropathy. AJR 134:9–15
Whitaker RH (1973) Methods of assessing obstruction in dilated ureters. Br J Urol 45:15–22
Lalli AF (1967) Abdominal pain, intermittent hydronephrosis, and accessory renal vessels, JAMA 199:182–184
Falk D (1958) Intermittent obstruction at the ureteropelvic junction. J Urol 79:16–20
Lowe FC, Marshall FF (1984) Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. Urology 23:331–335
Hoffer FA, Lebowitz RL (1985) Intermittent hydronephrosis: A unique feature of ureteropelvic junction obstruction caused by a crossing renal vessel. Radiology 156:655–658
Kendall AR, Karafin L (1967) Intermittent hydronephrosis: Hydration pyelography. J Urol 98:653–656
Barnett JS, Stephens FD (1962) The role of the lower segmental vessel in the aetiology of hydronephrosis. Aust N Z J Surg 31:203–213
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Horstman, W.G., Darcy, M.D. Intermittent hydronephrosis as a cause of a false-negative pressure-flow study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 14, 185–187 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02577727
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02577727