Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrastructure of feeding tubes formed in giant-cells induced in plants by the root-knot nematodeMeloidogyne incognita

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Summary

The plant pathogenic nematodeMeloidogyne incognita forms conspicuous tubular structures referred to as feeding tubes in special food cells, called giant-cells, induced and maintained in susceptible host roots by feeding nematodes. Feeding tubes are formed by nematode secretions injected into giant-cells via a stylet and apparently function to facilitate withdrawal of soluble assimilates by the parasite. In giant-cells in roots of the four host species examined in this study, feeding tube morphology was identical. Tubes were straight to slightly curved structures just less than 1 μm wide and up to slightly more than 70 μm long. At the ultrastructural level, each tube consisted of a 190–290 nm thick, electron-dense, crystalline wall surrounding an electron-transparent lumen with a diameter of 340–510 nm. The distal end of the tube was sealed with wall material. Older tubes were found free in the host cytoplasm while the proximal ends of young tubes were attached to the host cell wall via short wall ingrowths through which the nematode's stylet was inserted. An elaborate membrane system was associated with the feeding tubes and was most extensive around newly formed tubes. Contiguous to the feeding tube wall, this membrane system consisted of strands of smooth endoplasmic reticulum while rough endoplasmic reticulum predominated toward the outer margin of the membrane system. Vacuoles and mitochondria were excluded from a zone of cytoplasm surrounding feeding tubes. This zone of exclusion, as well as the membrane system noted above, tended to be less pronounced or absent around older tubes no longer being used by the nematode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bird AF, Loveys BR (1975) The incorporation of photosynthates byMeloidogyne javanica. J Nematol 7: 111–113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chrispeels MJ (1980) The endoplasmic reticulum. In: Tolbert NE (ed) The biochemistry of plants, vol 1, the plant cell. Academic Press, New York, pp 390–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Endo BY (1978) Feeding plug formation in soybean roots infected with the soybean cyst nematode. Phytopathology 68: 1022–1031

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1987) Ultrastructure of esophageal gland secretory granules in juveniles ofHeterodera glycines. J Nematol 19: 469–483

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris N (1986) Organization of endomembrane systems. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 37: 73–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CS (1985) Formation, anatomy, and physiology of giant cells induced by root-knot nematodes. In: Sasser JN, Carter CC (eds) An advanced treatise onMeloidogyne, vol 1, biology and control. North Carolina State University Graphics, Raleigh, NC, pp 115–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Huettel RN, Rebois RV (1985) Culturing plant parasitic nematodes using root explants. In: Zuckerman BM, Mai WF, Harrison (eds) Plant nematology laboratory manual. Univ Mass Agricult Exp Stat Amherst, MA, pp 155–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey RS (1989) Disease-inducing secretions of plant-parasitic nematodes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 27: 123–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1985) Host-parasite relationships and associated physiological changes. In: Sasser JN, Carter CC (eds) An advanced treatise onMeloidogyne, vol 1, biology and control. North Carolina State University Graphics, Raleigh, NC, pp 143–153

    Google Scholar 

  • — Barker KR (1973) A comparison of methods of collecting inocula ofMeloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Dis Rep 57: 1025–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • — Mims CW (1990) Ultrastructure of esophageal glands and their secretory granules in the root-knot nematodeMeloidogyne incognita. Protoplasma 156: 9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — Paguio OR, Seabury F (1990) Localization and purification of a secretory protein from the esophageal glands ofMeloidogyne incognita with a monoclonal antibody. Phytopathology 80: 809–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones MGK (1981) Host cell responses to endoparasitic nematode attack: structure and function of giant cells and syncytia. Ann Appl Biol 97: 353–372

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones RK (1978) Histological and ultrastructural changes in cereal roots caused by feeding ofHelicotylenchus spp. Nematologica 24: 393–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure MA (1977)Meloidogyne incognita: a metabolic sink. J Nematol 9: 88–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mims CW, Richardson EA, Taylor J (1988) Specimen orientation for transmission electron microscopic studies of fungal germ tubes and appressoria on artificial membranes and leaf surfaces. Mycologia 80: 586–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller M, Moor H (1984) Cryofixation of thick specimens by high pressure freezing. In: Revel J-P, Barnard T, Gaggis HG (eds) The science of biological specimen preparation for microscopy and microanalysis. Proceedings 2nd Pfefferkorn Conference. AMF O'Hare, Chicago, IL, pp 121–128

  • Nemec B (1911) Über die Nematodenkrankheiten der Zuckerrübe. Z Pflanzen 21: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Pate JS, Gunning ES (1972) Transfer cells. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 23: 173–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulson RE, Webster JM (1970) Giant cell formation in tomato roots caused byMeloidogyne incognita andMeloidogyne hapla (Nematoda)_infection. A light and electron microscopy study. Can J Bot 48: 271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razak AR, Evans AAF (1976) An intracellular tube associated with feeding byRotylenchulus reniformis on cowpea root. Nematologica 22: 182–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebois RV (1980) Ultrastructure of a feeding peg and tube associated withRotylenchulus reniformis in cotton. Nematologica 26: 396–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppenhorst HJ (1984) Intracellular feeding tubes associated with sedentary plant parasitic nematodes. Nematologica 30: 77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasser JN (1980) Root-knot nematodes: a global menace to crop production. Plant Dis 64: 36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuerger AC, McClure MA (1983) Ultrastructural changes induced byScutellonema brachyurum in potato roots. Phytopathology 73: 70–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggers RJ, Starr JL, Price HJ (1990) DNA content and variation in chromosome number in plant cells affected by the parasitic nematodesMeloidogyne incognita andM. arenaria. Phytopathology 80: 1391–1395

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyss U, Zunke U (1986) Observations on the behaviour of second-stage juveniles ofHeterodera schachtii inside host roots. Rev Nematol 9: 153–165

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Stender C, Lehmann H (1984) Ultrastructure of feeding sites of the cyst nematodeHeterodera schachtii Schmidt in roots of susceptible and resistantRaphanus sativus L. var.oleiformis cultivars. Physiol Plant Pathol 25: 21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hussey, R.S., Mims, C.W. Ultrastructure of feeding tubes formed in giant-cells induced in plants by the root-knot nematodeMeloidogyne incognita . Protoplasma 162, 99–107 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02562553

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02562553

Keywords

Navigation