Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic significance of clinical stage, histologic grade, and nuclear DNA content in squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Specimens from 47 cases of anal squamous-cell carcinoma were examined in Stockholm county (1978 to 1981) with respect to clinical stage (43 cases), histologic grade (41 cases), and DNA content of the tumor cells (31 cases). Follow-up ranged from four to seven years (median, 5.5 years). The increased mortality in advanced stage and high-grade lesions was significant. Analysis of DNA content showed that most tumors were aneuploid. No statistically significant effect of DNA content on survival could be demonstrated. Thus, histologic grade and clinical stage seem to be the best predictors of patient outcome in squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beahrs OH, Wilson SM. Carcinoma of the anus. Ann Surg 1976;184:422–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Golden GT, Horsley JS III Surgical management of epidermoid carcinoma of the anus. Am J Surg 1976; 131:275–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldman S, Ihre T, Seligson U. Squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus: a follow-up study of 65 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:143–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Papillon J. Rectal and anal cancers: conservative treatment by irradiation—an alternative to radical surgery. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982:201.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Glimelius B, Graffman S, Påhlman L, Wilander E. Radiation therapy of anal carcinoma. Acta Radiol Oncol 1983;22:273–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Auer G, Caspersson T, Wallgren A. DNA content and survival in mammary carcinoma. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1980;2:161–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Atkin NB, Richards BM. Clinical significance of ploidy in carcinoma of cervix: its relation to prognosis. Br Med J [Clin Res] 1962;2:1445–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaub J, Auer G, Zetterberg A. Quantitative cytochemical aspects of a combined Feulgen-Naphthol Yellow S staining procedure for the simultaneous determination of nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins and DNA in mammalian cells. Exp Cell Res 1975;92:323–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Adams LR. A photographic cytophotometric method which avoids distributional error. Acta Cytol 1968;12:3–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observations of each patients. II. Analysis and examples. Br J Cancer 1977;35:1–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohn K, Bäckdahl M, Forslund G, et al. Prognostic value of nuclear DNA content in papillary thyroid carcinoma. World J Surg 1984;8:474–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Erhardt K, Auer G, Björkholm E, et al. Prognostic significance of nuclear DNA content in serous ovarian tumors. Cancer Res 1984;44:2198–2202.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bennington JL, Mayall BH. DNA cytometry on four-micrometer sections of paraffin-embedded human renal adenocarcinomas. Cytometry 1983;4:31–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Goldman, S., Auer, G., Erhardt, K. et al. Prognostic significance of clinical stage, histologic grade, and nuclear DNA content in squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus. Dis Colon Rectum 30, 444–448 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556494

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556494

Key words

Navigation