Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Six Hologic QDR-1000 DEXA bone densitometers at different centers across the USA were compared to determine the intermachine variability. Nine scans in succession were acquired on each machine using a single anthropomorphic lumbar spine phantom (manufactured by Hologic). Values for BMC, area, and BMD were recorded for each measurement. Means, standard deviations (SD), and coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated for each machine. All the CVs (BMC, area, BMD) were less than 1% (range 0.3%–0.6%). The CV of the means at the six sites were 0.4%, 0.6%, and 0.5% for BMC, area, and BMD, respectively. Although several significant differences for BMC, area, and BMD were noted by ANOVA between machines at different sites, the difference between the highest and lowest means of the individual machines was only 1.1%, 1.31%, and 1.07% for BMC, area, and BMD. The small variations between the DEXA systems are encouraging for researchers involved in multicenter trials in which data are pooled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lindsay R, Fey C, Haboubi A (1987) Dual photon absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral increase with source life. Calcif Tiss Int 41:293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. DaCosta MD, Luckey MM, Meier DE, Mandeli JP, DeLaney ML, Stritzke PH, Goldsmith SJ (1989) Effect of source strength and attenuation on dual photon absorptiometry. J Nucl Med 30:1875–1881

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ott SM (1986) Should women get screening bone mass measurements? Ann Intern Med 104:(6)874–876

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pacifici R, Rupith R, Vered I, Fischer KC, Griffin M, Susman N, Avioli LV (1988) Dual energy radiography (DER): a preliminary comparative study. Calcif Tiss Int 43:189–191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelly TL, Slovik DM, Schoenfeld DA, Neer RM (1983) Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. J Clin Endo Metab 4:839–844

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sartoris DJ, Resnick D (January 1988) Digital radiography may spark renewal of bone densitometry. Diag Imaging: 145–157

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rencken, M.L., Murano, R., Drinkwater, B.L. et al. In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers. Calcif Tissue Int 48, 245–248 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556375

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556375

Key words

Navigation