Skip to main content
Log in

En bloc resection for contiguous upper abdominal invasion by adenocarcinoma of the colon

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Althoughen bloc resection for contiguous invasion by adenocarcinoma of the colon is a well-recognized principle, it is difficult to assess the efficacy of this principle when upper abdominal viscera are involved. This study was undertaken to better define this subgroup. Seventeen patients were studied over a period of 20 years who underwent extended resections for colonic adenocarcinoma with upper abdominal organ invasion. The age range was 30 to 81 years (average, 61 years). There was a male-to-female ratio of greater than 2,1. The duration of presenting symptoms was as short as 4 days and as long as 18 months (average, 4.3 months). The most common complaints was weight loss (13/17). The next most common complaint were abdominal pain (10/17), bowel complaints (5/17), and septic symptoms (4/17). A single organ was involved in 7 instances, but multiple organs were involved in most cases. The frequency of involvement was the stomach, spleen, and duodenum (5 each), abdominal wall and diaphragm (4 each), pancreas and liver (3 each). There were 2 perioperative deaths and 9 other major complications. The most common cause of morbidity and mortality was septic in nature in 8 of the 11 instances. All 3 patients with pancreatic resections had postoperative complications; none were fatal. Five patients survived over 10 years, three were 5-year survivors, and two are living and free of disease at less than 5 years. Excluding the two perioperative deaths, four of the five patients who died in less than 5 years had documented recurrences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glass RE, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Weakley FL. The results of surgical treatment of cancer of the colon at the Cleveland Clinic from 1965–1975: classification of the spread of colon cancer and long-term survival. Int J Colorect Dis 1986;1:33–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Welch JP, Donaldson GA. Perforative carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 1974;180:734–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Polk HC Jr. Extended resection for selected adenocarcinoma of the large bowel. Ann Surg 1972;175:892–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eldar S, Keneny MM, Terz JJ. Extended resections for carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1985;161:319–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelley W, Brown P, Lawrence W, Terez J. Penetrating, obstructing and perforating carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Arch Surg 1981;116:381–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McGlone TP, Bernie WA, Elliott DW. Survival following extended operations for extracolonic invasion of colon cancer. Arch Surg 1982;117:595–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jenson HE, Balsler I, Nielsen J. Extensive surgery in treatment of carcinoma of the colon. Acta Clin Scand 1970;136:431–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davies GC, Ellis H. Radical surgery in locally advanced cancer of the large bowel. Clin Oncol 1975;1:21–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Prohaska G. Multiple organ resection for advanced carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1953;97:177–82.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Budd DC, Fink DL. Reimplantation of the ampulla of vater. Am J Surg 1985;150:397–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. El-Domeiri A, Whiteley HW. Prognostic significance of abdominal wall involvement in carcinoma of cecum. Cancer 1970;26:552–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellis H, Morgan MN, Wastell C. “Curative” surgery in carcinoma of the colon involving duodenum: a report of 6 cases. Br J Surg 1972;59:932–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Steer ML, Glotzer DL. Colonic exclusion bypass principle: its use in the palliative treatment of malignant duodenocolic and gastrocolic fistulas. Arch Surg 1980;115:87–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Veen HF, Oscarson JE, Malt RA. Alien cancers of the duodenum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1976;143:39–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Welch JP, Warshaw AL. Malignant duodenocolic fistula. A J Surg 1977;133:658–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Danforth DN, Thorbjarnarson B. Incidental splenectomy: a review of the literature and the New York Hospital experience. Ann Surg 1976;183:124–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Langevin JM, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Accidental splenic injury during surgical treatment of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1984;159:139–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Anaheim, California, June 12 to 17, 1988.

About this article

Cite this article

Landmann, D.D., Fazio, V.W., Lavery, I.C. et al. En bloc resection for contiguous upper abdominal invasion by adenocarcinoma of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 32, 669–672 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555771

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555771

Key words

Navigation