Abstract
Between the years 1965–1975, 564 patients underwent surgical treatment for cancer of the colon. The primary tumour was removed in 502 patients (89%) in all cases with a “no touch isolation” technique. The 5-year survival rate corrected for age was 64% in 546 operative survivors, and 82% in 413 patients operated with intent to cure. Survival analyses are presented classifying the spread of the tumour by (1) the clinico-pathological method of Turnbull, (2) the TNM method, (3) the Astler-Coller method, (4) Dukes' method. The results suggest that (a) the Astler-Coller classification offers no advantage over that of Dukes' when predicting survival for patients after operation for cure, and (b) that separating those patients considered to have evidence of invasion of an adjacent organ at operation (Turnbull's classification) from those patients without evidence of contiguous growth, is only justified if invasion of cancer is confirmed by histological examination of the resected specimen.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Turnbull RB, Kyle K, Watson FR, Spratt J (1967) Cancer of the colon: The influence of the no-touch isolation technic on survival rates. Ann Surg 166:420–427
Manual for staging of cancer (1977) American Joint Committee for Cancer Staging and End Results Reporting. Chicago: AJCCS
Dukes CE (1932) The classification of cancer of the rectum. J Pathol Bact 35:323–332
Astler VB, Coller FA (1954) The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 136:846–852
Turnbull RB (1970) Cancer of the colon. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 46:243–250
Cutler SJ, Ederer F (1958) Maximum utilization of the life table method in analysing survival. J Chron Dis 8:699–713
US National Center for Health Statistics. Vital statistics of the United States 1970
Cox DR (1972) Regression modes and life tables. J R Stat Soc 23 (Series B): 187–200
Dejode LR (1982) Prospects in large bowel cancer: editorial. J R Soc Med 75:301–303
Slaney G (1971) Irvine 4 (Edit) In: Modern trends in surgery, No 3. Butterworths, London, p 69–89
Goligher JC (1980) Surgery of the anus rectum and colon, 4th edn. Bailliere Tindall, London
Milnes Walker R (1968) Cancer in Southwest England. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 42:145–162
Hawley PR (1977) The results of surgery in a specialized hospital. In: Truelove S (ed) Topics in gastroenterology 5. Blackwell, Oxford.
Enker WE, Laffer UT, Black G (1979) Enhanced survival of patients with colon and rectal cancer is based upon wide anatomic resection. Ann Surg 190:350–360
Kirklin JW, Dockerty MD, Waugh JW (1949) The role of the peritoneal reflection in the prognosis of carcinoma of the rectum and sigmoid colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 88:326–333
Dukes CE, Bussey HJR (1958) The spread of rectal cancer and its effect on prognosis. Br J Surg 12:309–320
Wood CB, Gillis CR, Hole D, Malcolm AJH, Blumgart LW (1981) Local tumour invasion as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 68:326–328
Malcolm Perencerick NP, Olson RM, Henley JA, Chaffey Wilson RE (1981) Analysis of recurrent problems following curative resection for carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 152:131–137
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glass, R.E., Fazio, V.W., Jagelman, D.G. et al. The results of surgical treatment of cancer of the colon at the Cleveland Clinic from 1965–1975: classification of the spread of colon cancer and long-term survival. Int J Colorect Dis 1, 33–39 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01648834
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01648834