Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gracilis muscle transposition in the treatment of fecal incontinence

Long-term follow-up and evaluation of anal pressure recordings

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

The results after gracilis muscle transposition were studied in ten patients with a follow-up of six months to 17 years. Nine patients were continent for formed feces and the condition of one patient worsened after operation. Anorectal manometry was performed in eight of the ten patients. Evaluation of pressure recordings showed a normal image, both at rest and at maximal squeeze, in five patients. Low-pressure recordings at rest and at maximal squeeze were seen in two continent patients, in whom the tissue scarring resulted in narrowing of the anal canal. One patient with low-pressure recordings was completely incontinent. An attempt was made to explain the continence and low-pressure recordings. The results suggest gracilis muscle transposition to be a method of choice in patients with total incontinence who have no functional anal sphincter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pickrell KL, Broadbent TR, Masters FW, Metzger JT. Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle. Ann Surg 1952;135:853–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hewitt J, Rigby J, Reeve J, et al. Whole gut irrigation in preparation for large bowel surgery. Lancet 1973;2:337.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruijnes E. The ureteral pressure profile. Urol Int 1978;33:381–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Corman ML. Follow-up evaluation of gracilis muscle transposition for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:552–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Feuchtwanger M, Ben-Hur N. The surgical correction of anal incontinence by complete perineoplasty: case report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968;41:268–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lewis MI. Gracilis-muscle transplant for the correction of anal incontinence: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1972;15:292–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacob ET, Shapira Z, Bar-Natan N, Berant M. Total anorectal reconstruction following congenital anorectal anomaly: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1976;19:172–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McGregor RA. Gracilis, muscle transplant in anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1965;8:141–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Turell R, ed. Diseases of the colon and anorectum. 2nd ed. Vol 2. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1969:1029.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nieves PM, Valles TG, Aranguren G, Maldonado D. Gracilis muscle transplant for correction of traumatic anal incontinence: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1975;18:349–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Atri SB. The treatment of complete rectal prolapse by graciloplasty. Br J Surg 1980;67:431–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Corman ML. Management of fecal incontinence by gracilis muscle transposition. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:290–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ben-Hur N, Gilai A, Golan J, Sagher U, Issac M. Reconstruction of the anal sphincter by gracilis muscle transfer: the value of electromyography in the preoperative assessment and postoperative management of the patient. Br J Plast Surg 1980;33:156–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuster MM. Discussion. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:105.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Parks AG. Anal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med 1975;68:681–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Leguit, P., van Baal, J.G. & Brummelkamp, W.H. Gracilis muscle transposition in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 28, 1–4 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553893

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553893

Key words

Navigation