Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A method of clinical prognostic staging for patients with rectal cancer

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Methods of prognostic stratification for patients with rectal cancer currently rely solely on the extent of tumor penetration in the surgically excised rectum. Thus stratification according to prognostic factors can be performed only after treatment has been carried out and can play no role in pretherapeutic treatment decisions or in the design of trials of preoperative adjuvant treatment. To devise a method of clinical prognostic staging that could be applied to all patients with rectal cancer, regardless of therapy, the medical records were examined of an inception cohort of 282 patients treated by surgical and nonsurgical methods at three Toronto hospitals during the years 1968 to 1974. Six groups of clinical variables were identified that independently influenced prognosis: the presence or absence of metastatic disease, whether the rectal tumor was fixed or mobile, an annular rectal tumor, and the systemic symptoms of weight loss, anorexia, or weakness, and anemia. A composite method was developed for clinical prognostic staging from these variables and it was found that it created substantial gradients in survival. In patients treated by surgery, for whom comparisons of clinical staging with conventional anatomic staging were possible, clinical staging was as effective a method of prognostic staging as was anatomic staging. Furthermore, the prognostic impact of clinical staging persisted after adjustment for the effects of anatomic staging. This method of clinical prognostic staging should prove useful in making therapeutic decisions and in the design and analysis of clinical trials of alternative treatment for patients with rectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirklin JW, Dockerty MB, Waugh JM. The role of the peritoneal reflection in the prognosis of carcinoma of the rectum and a sigmoid colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1949;88:326–31.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Feinstein AR, Schimpff CR, Hull EW. A reappraisal of staging and therapy for patients with cancer of the rectum. I. Development of two new systems of staging. Arch Intern Med 1975;135:1441–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examples. Br J Cancer 1977;35:1–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Davies GC, Ellis M. Radical surgery in locally advanced cancer of the large bowel. Clin Oncol 1975;1:21–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Buckwalter JA Jr, Kent TH. Prognosis and surgical pathology of carcinoma of the colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1973;136:465–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyd NF, Cummings BJ, Harwood A, Rider WD, Thomas G. Observer variation in the assessment of patient with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum (in press).

  7. Arnaud JP, Joehl C, Adloff M. Carcinomembryonic antigen (CEA) in diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:141–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ege GN, Cummings BJ. Interstitial radiocolloid iliopelvic lymphoscintigraphy: technique, anatomy and clinical application. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1980;6:1483–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kressel HY, Callen PW, Montagne JP, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of disorders affecting the alimentary tract. Radiology 1978;129:451–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carbone PP, Kaplan HS, Musshoff K, Smithers DW, Tubiana M. Report of the committee on Hodgkin's disease staging classification. Cancer Res 1971;31:1860–1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Charlson ME, Feinstein AR. A new clinical index of growth rate in the staging of breast cancer. Am J Med 1980; 69:527–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peter JL, Loeb M, Siu TO. A multivariate analysis of the contribution of “auxometry” to prognosis in breast cancer. J Chron Dis 1979;32:375–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boyd NF, Meakin JW, Hayward JL, Brown TC. Clinical estimation of the growth rate of breast cancer. Gancer 1981; 48:1037–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Feinstein AR. Symptoms as an index of biological behaviour and prognosis in human cancer. Nature 1966;209:241–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Feinstein AR, Schimpff CR, Andrews JF Jr, Wells CK. Cancer of the larynx: a new staging system and a re-appraisal of prognosis and treatment. J Chron Dis 1977;30:277–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Zorzitto, M., Germanson, T., Cummings, B. et al. A method of clinical prognostic staging for patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 25, 759–765 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553307

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553307

Key words

Navigation