Skip to main content
Log in

Volume determinations by transrectal ultrasonography in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: Correlation with removed prostate weight

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimation of prostate gland volume with transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) provides important information in the evaluation of benign and malignant prostate disease. We evaluated 119 patients with clinically benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by TRUS. Sixty-eight of these underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P), and 51 patients underwent open prostatectomy. In both groups the estimated weight correlated well with the removed prostatic weight (r=0.643, p<0.0001 in TUR-P and r=0.729, p<0.0001 in open prostatectomy). We found that TRUS is a valuable method for estimation of prostatic volume in patients with BPH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Veneziano, S., Pavlica, P., Querze, R., Lalanne, M. G., Vecchi, F.: Correlation between prostate specific antigen and prostate volume evaluated by transrectal ultrasonography: Usefulness in diagnosis of prostate cancer.Eur. Urol., 18, 112 (1990).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Collins, G. N., Lee, R. J., Russell, E. B., Raab, G. M., Hehir, M.: Ultrasonically determined patterns of enlargement in benign prostatic hyperplasia.Br. J. Urol., 71, 451 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bissada, N. K., Finkbeiner, E. A., Redman, J. F.: Accuracy in preoperative estimation of resection weight in transurethral prostatectomy.J. Urol., 116, 201 (1976).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Watanabe, H.: Diagnosis of benign prostatic hypertrophy by ultrasound and outcome of surgery.Aktuel. Urol., 24, 127 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Littrup, P. J., Williams, C. R., Egglin, T. K., Kane, R. A.: Determination of prostate volume with transrectal US for cancer screening. Part II. Accuracy of in vitro and in vivo techniques.Radiology, 179, 49 (1991).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Watanabe, H., Igari, D., Tanashashi, Y., Harada, K., Saitoh, M.: Measurements of size and weight of prostate by means of transrectal ultrasonotomography.Tokohuku J. Exp. Med., 114, 277 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rassmussen, F.: Weight loss of prostatic tissue during electroresection.Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 9, 214 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Einarsson, O. J., Lyrdal, F., Neidhardt, F. O.: The ‘shrinkage’ of the prostate during transurethral resection.Br. J. Urol., 55, 38 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Edwards, L.: Transurethral incision of the prostate or bladder neck incision. In: Fitzpatrick, J. M., Krane, R. J. (eds): The Prostate. Churchill Livingstone, New York 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meyhoff, A. H.: Transurethral versus transvesical prostatectomy.Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1020 (Suppl.), 3 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Melchior, J., Walk, W. L., Foret, J. D., Mebust, W. K.: Transurethral prostatectomy: Computerized analysis of 2,223 consecutive cases.J. Urol., 112, 634 (1974).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nebust, W. K., Holtgrewe, H. L.: Current status of transurethral prostatectomy.World J. Urol., 6, 194 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Perkash, I., Kataria, P. N., Takkar, K. L., Batra, R. S., Khanna, O. P.: Evaluation of suprapubic prostatectomy using an absorbable purse-string suture at vesical neck.J. Urol., 105, 831 (1971).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nicol, G. A., Riffle, G. N., Abderson, F. O.: Suprapubic prostatectomy. The removable purse string: A continuing comparative analysis of 300 consecutive cases.J. urol., 120, 702 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  15. O'Connor, V. J., Bulkley, G. J., Sokol, J. K.: Low suprapubic prostatectomy: Comparison of results with the standard operation in two comparable groups of 142 patients.J. Urol., 90, 301 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mebust, W. K., Holtgrewe, H. L., Cockett, A. T. K., Peters, P. C. and writing committee. Transurethral prostatectomy: Immediate and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients.J. Urol., 141, 243 (1989).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Miyazaki, Y., Yamaguchi, A., Hara, S.: The value of transrectal ultrasonography in preoperative assessment for transurethral prostatectomy.J. Urol., 129, 48 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Aus, G., Bergdahl, S., Hugosson, J., Norlen, L.: Volume determinations of the whole prostate and of adenomas by transrectal ultrasound in patients with clinically benign prostatic hyperplasia: Correlation of resected weight, blood loss and duration of operation.Br. J. Urol., 73, 659 (1994).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alkan, I., Türkeri, L., Biren, T. et al. Volume determinations by transrectal ultrasonography in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: Correlation with removed prostate weight. International Urology and Nephrology 28, 517–523 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550959

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550959

Keywords

Navigation