Skip to main content
Log in

Ambulante Datenerfassung an Schmerzpatienten mittels elektronischem Schmerztagebuch

Documantation of pain-related data in outpatients with a specially designed pocket computer (Rating Box)

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Schmerz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The documentation of illness-related data, e.g. repetitive recordings of pain parameters, medication or mood, is commonly accomplished by the use of questionnaires. Several disadvantages for both the patient and experimentor related to this method can be avoided by the application of specially designed data-loggers. The use of commercially available portable pocket computers is usually complicated because of the miniature full-range keybords. This paper describes a completely new design, which relies on the use of only four keys. All operations are imaged on an LCD display (4 lines with 16 signs). The Rating Box allows the presentation of visual analogue scales (VAS) of different step widths, movement of cursors, forced choice and multiple choice decisions, as well as the input of decimal numbers. Up to 11 scale types can be deliberately combined in a series of up to 27 items. The combination can be individually designed and edited by the experimentor. The results are stored together with the input time and date. Actual inputs are not influenced by comparison to earlier input, since data recall can only be accessed by the experimentor. The use of the Rating Box by a patient is called up by signal tones at individually given times of day. Additional inputs are possible when required. Warnings are presented for general malfunctions. The results can be transmitted to a personal computer and processed statistically or to daily or weekly profiles of mood, pain or disability scores, for example. A pilot study in elderly patients (42–76 years) with pain due to cancer gave promising results. The Rating Box was well accepted as opposed to a questionnaire. Nine out of 12 patients preferred the Rating Box both methods were judged to be equivalent by two patients and only one regarded the use as difficult and thus preferred the questionnaire. In addition, 5 out of 12 patients confessed by inquiry to have filled in the questionnaire forms retrospectively. This possibility is in principle excluded by the Rating Box.

Zusammenfassung

Zur Dokumentation krankheitsbezogener Daten wie z.B. Schmerzverlauf, Medikation oder psychischer Verfassung werden bisher überwiegend Fragebögen verwendet. Hiermit sind für Patient und Untersuchungsleiter eine Reihe von Nachteilen verbunden, die bei Verwendung eines geeigneten Taschencomputers nicht auftreten. Entsprechend programmierte kommerzielle Geräte sind zwar prinzipiell geeignet, allerdings wird die Bedienung durch die miniaturisierte Eingabetastatur unübersichtlich. In diesem Artikel wird ein neu entwickeltes Gerät vorgestellt, das sich auf vier Tasten beschränkt. Eine Abfrage besteht aus einer maximal 27 Einzelfragen umfassenden Kombination von elf verschiedenen Skalentypen, die individuell editiert werden können. Die gewonnenen Daten werden zur weiteren Verarbeitung auf einen Personal-Computer übertragen. Eine erste Untersuchung zur Erfassung von Schmerzen bei Tumorpatienten, an der überwiegend ältere Personen teilnahmen, lieferte sehr zufriedenstellende Ergebnisse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Eich E, Reeves JL, Jaeger B, Graff-Radford SB (1985) Memory for pain: relation between past and present pain intensity. Pain 23:375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Handwerker HO (1984) Some aspects of pain measurement in man. Arzneimittelforschung 34:1093

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Heger R (1990) Apparative Datenerfassung in Feldstudien. Diagnostica 36:60

    Google Scholar 

  4. Poulton EC (1979) Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. Psychol Bull 86:777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Price D (1984) Roles of psychophysics, neuroscience, and experimential analysis in the study of pain. Adv Pain Res Ther 6:341

    Google Scholar 

  6. Seemann H (1987) Anamnesen und Verlaufsprotokolle chronischer Schmerzen für die Praxis—Ein Überblick. Der Schmerz 1:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Seymour RA, Simpson JM, Charlton JE, Phillips ME (1985) An evaluation of length and end-phrase of visual analogue scales in dental pain. Pain 21:177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wahlgren CF, Ekblom A, Hägermark Ö (1989) Some aspects of the experimental induction and measurement of itch. Acta Derm Venereol 69:185

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ostermeier, M., Lang, E., Pittel, M. et al. Ambulante Datenerfassung an Schmerzpatienten mittels elektronischem Schmerztagebuch. Schmerz 5, 9–14 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02529659

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02529659

Navigation