Skip to main content
Log in

Regional Nodal basin control is not compromised by previous sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with melanoma

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Regional nodal basin control is an important goal of lymphadenectomy in the management of melanoma patients with nodal disease. The purpose of this study was to determine if previous sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy compromises the ultimate regional nodal control achieved by subsequent therapeutic lymph node dissection in melanoma patients with microscopic lymph node metastases.

Methods

A surgical melanoma database and hospital records were reviewed for 602 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent successful lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy between 1991 and 1997.

Results

A total of 105 (17%) of 602 patients had histologically positive SLNs and were offered therapeutic lymphadenectomy; 101 (96%) underwent this procedure. Thirty-six patients (36%) developed recurrent melanoma at one or more sites. The median follow-up period was 30 months. Recurrence in the previously dissected nodal basin was observed in 10 patients (10%); none had recurrence at only that site. Nodal basin disease appeared after local/in-transit (n=6) or distant (n=1) failure in seven patients and, as a component of the first site of failure, simultaneously with local/in-transit (n=2) or distant (n=1) recurrence in three patients.

Conclusions

Nodal basin failure after lymphadenectomy in patients who underwent previous biopsy of a histologically positive SLN is primarily a function of aggressive locoregional disease rather than of contamination from previous surgery. Because regional nodal control was comparable with that in other series, we conclude that SLN biopsy with selective lymphadenectomy does not compromise regional nodal basin control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ross M. The case for elective lymphadenectomy.Surg Oncol Clin N Am 1992;1:205–22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ross M, Balch C. The current management of cutaneous melanoma,Adv Surg 1990;24:139–200.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balch C, Milton G, Cascinelli N, et al. Elective lymph node dissection: pros and cons. In. Balch C, Houghton A, Milton G, et al., eds.Cutaneous Melanoma, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1992:345.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Slingluff CL Jr, Stidham KR, Ricci WM, Stanley WE, Seigler HF. Surgical management of regional lymph nodes in patients with melanoma.Ann Surg 1994;219:120–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelemen P, Wanek L, Morton D. Lymph node biopsy does not impair survival after therapeutic dissection for palpable melanoma metastases.Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:139–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Balch CM, Soong SJ, Murad TM, Ingalls AL, Maddox WA. A multifactorial analysis of melanoma: III. Prognostic factors in melanoma patients with lymph node metastases (stage II).Ann Surg 1981;193:377–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Landis S, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo P. Cancer statistics.CA Cancer J Clin 1999;49:8–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller EJ, Daly JM, Synnestvedt M, Schultz D, Elder D, Guerry D 4th. Loco-regional nodal relapse in melanoma.Surg Oncol 1992;1:333–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Calabro A, Singletary S, Balch C. Patterns of relapse in 1001 consecutive patients with melanoma nodal metastases.Arch Surg 1989;124:1051–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gershenwald JE, Thompson W, Mansfield PF, et al., Multi-institutional lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients.J Clin Oncol 1999;17:976–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lefebvre JL, Coche-Dequeant B, Van JT, et al. Cervical lymph nodes from an unknown primary tumor in 190 patients.Am J Surg 1990;160:443–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Austin JR, Byers RM, Brown WD, Wolf P. Influence of biopsy on the prognosis of cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck.Head Neck 1996;18:107–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gershenwald JE, Colome MI, Lee JE, et al. Patterns of recurrence following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy in 243 patients with stage I or II melanoma.J Clin Oncol 1998;16:2253–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ross M, Reintgen D, Balch C. Selective lymphadenectomy: emerging role for lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the management of early stage melanoma.Semin Surg Oncol 1993;9:219–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma.Arch Surg 1992;127:392–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Morton DL, Wen DR, Cochran A. Management of early-stage melanoma by intraoperative lymphatic mapping and selective lymphadenectomy or “watch and wait.”Surg Oncol Clin N Am 1992;1:247–59.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reintgen D, Cruse C, Wells K, et al. The orderly progression of melanoma nodal metastases.Ann Surg 1994;220:759–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gershenwald JE, Tseng CH, Thompson W, et al. Improved sentinel lymph node localization in primary melanoma patients with the use of radiolabeled colloid.Surgery 1998;124:203–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gadd M, Coit D. Recurrence patterns and outcome in 1019 patients undergoing axillary or inguinal lymphadenectomy for melanoma.Arch Surg 1992;127:1412–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Coates AS, Ingvar CI, Peterson-Schaefer K, et al. Elective lymph node dissection in patients with primary melanoma of the trunk and limbs treated at the Sydney Melanoma Unit from 1960 to 1991.J Am Coll Surg 1995;180:402–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Warso MA, Das Gupta TK. Melanoma recurrence in a previously dissected lymph node basin.Arch Surg 1994;129:252–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Monsour P, Sause W, Avent J, Noyes R. Local control following therapeutic nodal dissection for melanoma.J Surg Oncol 1993;54:18–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Buzaid AC, Ross MI, Balch CM, et al. Critical analysis of the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma and proposal of a new staging system.J Clin Oncol 1997;15:1039–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Coit D, Rogatko A, Brennan M. Prognostic factors in patients with melanoma metastatic to axillary or inguinal lymph nodes: a multivariate analysis.Ann Surg 1991;214:627–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

J.E.G. and R.S.B contributed equally to this study. Presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gershenwald, J.E., Berman, R.S., Porter, G. et al. Regional Nodal basin control is not compromised by previous sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with melanoma. Annals of Surgical Oncology 7, 226–231 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02523658

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02523658

Key Words

Navigation