Skip to main content
Log in

Sentinel lymphonodectomy and S-classification: A successful strategy for better prediction and improvement of outcome of melanoma

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most successful strategies in the management of melanoma have always been based on early diagnosis and timely surgical removal. Sentinel lymphonodectomy (SLNE) is the most reliable technique for the detection of melanoma micrometastases in regional lymph nodes. The micromorphometric S-classification, a routinely determinable surrogate of tumor burden in the sentinel lymph node (SLN), has high prognostic relevance. SIII metastases, defined by a depth of invasion (d) greater than 1 mm below the capsular level, imply a risk of more than 50% for the presence of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in the same basin and for the emergence of distant metastases within 5 years of follow-up. Corresponding risk with SI metastases (d≤0.3 mm) and SII metastases (0.3 mm<d≤1 mm) do not exceed 15%. The survival curve for patients with SIII metastases approaches that of patients in the pre-SLNE era who underwent delayed lymph node dissection for subsequently detected nodal macrometastases. The survival of patients with initially removed SI and SII metastases is much better, similar to that of patients with S0 metastases. This explains the significant survival benefit of SLN-guided surgery in the entire population of patients with melanomas thicker than 0.75 mm, although the outcome of the subgroup without nodal metastases is not influenced by SLNE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Virchow, R. Dritte Vorlesung. Allgemeine Physiologie der Geschwülste. In: Virchow R.Die krankhaften Geschwülste. Berlin: Hirschwald-Verlag, 1863:33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al. Technical details of intra-operative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma.Arch Surg 1992;127:392–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cochran AJ, Balda BR, Starz H, et al. The Augsburg Consensus. Techniques of lymphatic mapping, sentinel lymphadenectomy, and completion lymphadenectomy in cutaneous malignancies.Cancer 2000;89:236–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Essner R, et al. Validation of the accuracy of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanoma: a multicenter trial. Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial Group.Ann Surg 1999; 230:453–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bachter D, Balda BR, Vogt H, et al. Die “sentinel” Lymphonodektomie mittels Szintillationsdetektor. Eine neue Strategie in der Behandlung maligner Melanome.Hautarzt 1996;47:754–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bachter D, Balda BR, Vogt H, et al. Primary therapy of malignant melanomas: sentinel lymphadenectomy.Int J Dermatol 1998;37: 278–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Starz H, De Donno A, Balda BR. The Augsburg experience: histological aspects and patient outcomes.Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8(9 Suppl): 48S-51S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Starz H, Balda BR, Krämer KU, et al. A micromorphometry-based concept for routine classification of sentinel lymph node metastases and its clinical relevance for patients with melanoma.Cancer 2001;91:2110–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cochran AJ, Starz H. Pathologic aspects. In: Cody HS III.Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy. London: Martin Dunitz Ltd, 2002:79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Volkenandt M, Schmidt M, Konz B, et al. Klinisch-epidemiologische Daten von Patienten mit malignen Melanomen aus dem Bereich des Tumorzentrums München von 1977 bis 1997.Hautarzt 1999;50:470–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cascinelli N, Morabito A, Santinami M, et al. Immediate or delayed dissection of regional nodes in patients with melanoma of the trunk: a randomised trial. WHO Melanoma Programme.Lancet 1998;351:793–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sleeman JP. The lymph node as a bridgehead in the metastatic dissemination of tumors.Rec Res Cancer Res 2000;157:55–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Balch CM, Soong S, Roos MI, et al. Long-term results of a multi-institutional randomized trial comparing prognostic factors and surgical results for intermediate thickness melanomas (1.0 to 4.0 mm). Intergroup Melanoma Surgical Trial.Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7:87–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kretschmer L, Hilgers R, Möhrle M, et al. Patients with lymphatic metastasis from cutaneous malignant melanoma benefit from sentinel lymphonodectomy and early excision of their nodal disease.Eur J Cancer 2004;40:212–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Starz MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Starz, H., Siedlecki, K. & Balda, BR. Sentinel lymphonodectomy and S-classification: A successful strategy for better prediction and improvement of outcome of melanoma. Annals of Surgical Oncology 11 (Suppl 3), 162S–168S (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02523622

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02523622

Key Words

Navigation