Skip to main content
Log in

Integral formulas for geopotential coefficient determination from gravity anomalies versus gravity disturbances

  • Published:
Bulletin géodésique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integral formulas are derived for the determination of geopotential coefficients from gravity anomalies and gravity disturbances over the surface of the Earth. First order topographic corrections to spherical formulas are presented. In addition new integral formulas are derived for the determination of the external gravity field from surface gravity.

Taking advantage of modern satellite positioning techniques, it is suggested that, in general, the external gravity field as well as individual coefficients are better determined from gravity disturbances than from gravity anomalies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • G. ALMQVIST, 1960: Mathematical methods for determination of the gravity potential. InCommunications from The Royal Institute of Technology to the Twelfth General Assembly of the IUGG, Helsinki, 1960. Dept. of Geodesy, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.Y. CRUZ, 1986: Ellipsoidal Corrections to Potential Coefficients Obtained From Gravity Anomaly Data On the Ellipsoid.OSU Report No. 371.

  • D.M. GLEASON, 1988: Comparing ellipsoidal corrections to the transformation between geopotential's spherical and ellipsoidal spectrums.Manuscripta Geodaetica (1988), 13: pp. 114–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. HEISKANEN and H. MORITZ, 1967: Physical Geodesy. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. HOTINE, 1969: Mathematical Geodesy. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. JEKELI, 1980: Comparison of undulation difference accuracies using gravity anomalies and gravity disturbances.Bull. Geod., 54, pp. 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.H. RAPP and J.Y. CRUZ, 1986a: The representation of the Earth's gravitational potential in a spherical harmonic expansion to degree 250.OSU Report No. 372.

  • R.H. RAPP and J.Y. CRUZ, 1986b: Spherical harmonic expansions of the Earth's gravitational potential to degree 360 using 30′ mean anomalies.OSU Report No. 376.

  • L.E. SJÖBERG, 1986: The modification of Stokes' and Hotine's formulas—a comparison.Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Geodetic Commission, Helsinki, 29 Sept.–3 Oct. 1986, pp. 268–278.

  • L.E. SJÖBERG, 1988a: A new integral approach to geopotential coefficient determinations from terrestrial gravity or satellite altimetry data.Bull. Geod. 62 (1988), pp. 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L.E. SJÖBERG, 1988b: Geopotential coefficient determination and the gravimetric boundary value problem—a new approach.Proceedings of the Chapman, Conference on “Progress in the determination of the Earth's gravity field.”, Ft Lauderdale, Florida, September 13–16, 1988.

  • L.E. SJÖBERG and H. FAN, 1986: A comparison of the modified Stoke's formula and Hotine's formula in physical geodesy.The Department of Geodesy, Report No. 4, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sjöberg, L.E. Integral formulas for geopotential coefficient determination from gravity anomalies versus gravity disturbances. Bull. Geodesique 63, 213–221 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02519152

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02519152

Keywords

Navigation