Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of undulation difference accuracies using gravity anomalies and gravity disturbances

  • Published:
Bulletin géodésique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Errors are considered in the outer zone contribution to oceanic undulation differences as obtained from a set of potential coefficients complete to degree 180. It is assumed that the gravity data of the inner zone (a spherical cap), consisting of either gravity anomalies or gravity disturbances, has negligible error. This implies that error estimates of the total undulation difference are analyzed. If the potential coefficients are derived from a global field of 1°×1° mean anomalies accurate to εΔg=10 mgal, then for a cap radius of 10°, the undulation difference error (for separations between 100 km and 2000 km) ranges from 13 cm to 55 cm in the gravity anomaly case and from 6 cm to 36 cm in the gravity disturbance case. If εΔg is reduced to 1 mgal, these errors in both cases are less than 10 cm. In the absence of a spherical cap, both cases yield identical error estimates: about 68 cm if εΔg=1 mgal (for most separations) and ranging from 93 cm to 160 cm if εΔg=10 mgal. Introducing a perfect 30-degree reference field, the latter errors are reduced to about 110 cm for most separations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D.C. CHRISTODOULIDIS: “On the realization of a 10 cm relative oceanic geoid”. OSU, Dept. of Geod. Sci. report ≠247, Nov. 1976.

  • W.A. HEISKANEN and H. MORITZ:Physical Geodesy. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. HOTINE:Mathematical Geodesy. ESSA Monograph No. 2, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. JEKELI: “Global Accuracy Estimates of Point and Mean Undulation Differences Obtained from Gravity Disturbances, Gravity Anomalies, and Potential Coefficients”. OSU, Dept. of Geod. Sci. report ≠288, May 1979.

  • M.S. MOLODENSKIIet al.: Methods for the Study of the External Gravitational Field and Figure of the Earth, translated from Russian (1960), Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1962.

  • H. MORITZ: “Advanced Least-Squares Methods”. OSU, Dept. of Geod. Sci. report ≠175, June 1972.

  • H. MORITZ: “Precise Gravimetric Geodesy”. OSU, Dept. of Geod. Sci. report ≠219, June 1974.

  • R.H. RAPP: “Analytical and Numerical Differences between two Methods for the Combination of Gravimetric and Satellite Data”.Boll. Geofis, vol. 11, pp. 108–118, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.H. RAPP: “A review of Anomaly and Undulation Determination from GEOS-3 Altimeter Data”. paper presented at the 1979 Spring Meeting of the American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., May 1979.

  • C. TSCHERNING and R.H. RAPP: “Closed Covariance Expressions for the Gravity Anomalies, Geoid Undulations, and Deflections of the vertical implied by Anomaly Degree variance Models”, OSU, Dept. of Geod. Sci. report ≠208, May 1974.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jekeli, C. Comparison of undulation difference accuracies using gravity anomalies and gravity disturbances. Bull. Geodesique 54, 137–147 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521243

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521243

Keywords

Navigation