Skip to main content
Log in

Niche modification and stability of competitive systems. III. Simulation model analysis

  • Published:
Researches on Population Ecology

Summary

Simulation model for niche shift in ecological time scale was constructed on the basis of the optimal foraging theory. In accordance with the previous experimental study (Shimada andFujii, 1985), the model competitive system consisted of 2 parasitoid wasp species utilizing 4 host stages. Wasps were assumed to choose host stages in the manner that they realized the maximal gain/cost values, where gain was represented by body weight of a wasp progeny emerging from each host stage and cost was expressed by time required to search for and detect an unparasitized host. The number of parasitized hosts in each host stage was calculated numerically by usingArditt's (1983) model for avoidance of superparasitism.

The model simulated well the experimental results ofShimada andFujii (1985) andShimada (1985). Sensitivity analysis of the model showed that the experimentally derived criterion for competitive coexistence (different second-best host stages between competing species even with the common best) was not necessarily the indispensable condition for niche shift and separation, but that if the criterion was not satisfied, stable competitive coexistence occurred only in the narrow range of the parametric values. Further, niche shift in ecological time scale made the competitive coexistence more stable than fixed niche on which the current niche theory stands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, P. (1975) Limiting similarity and the form of the competition coefficient.Theor. Popul. Biol.8: 356–375.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, P. (1980) Are competition coefficients constant? Inductive versus deductive approaches.Amer. Natur.116: 730–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, P. (1983) The theory of limiting similarity.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.14: 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arditi, R. (1983) A unified model of the functional response of predators and parasitoids.J. Anim. Ecol.52: 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brew, J. S. (1982) Niche shift and the minimization of competition.Theor. Popul. Biol.22: 367–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, F. B. andT. M. Fenchel (1971)Theories of population in biological communities. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, A. E. (1983) Realized niche overlap, resource abundance and intensity of interspecific competition. 261–280. InR. B. Huey, E. R. Pianka, andT. W. Schoener (eds)Lizard ecology: studies of a model organism. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism.Can. Entomol.91: 385–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J. R. (1978) Optimal foraging: decision rules for predators. 23–63. InJ. R. Krebs andN. B. Davies (eds)Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor, L. (1980) Overlap, similarity, and competition coefficients.Ecology61: 245–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. (1968)Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations. Princeton Univ. Press. Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. (1969) Species packing, and what interspecies competition minimizes.Pro. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.64: 1369–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. (1972)Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. andR. Levins (1967) The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species.Amer. Natur.101: 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1974)Stability and complexity in model ecosystems (2nd ed.). Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1981) Models for two interacting populations. 78–104. InR. M. May (ed)Theoretical ecology: principle and applications (2nd ed.). Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E. R. (1973) The structure of lizard communities.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.4: 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E. R. (1978)Evolutionary ecology (2nd ed.). Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E. R. (1981) Competition and niche theory. 167–196. InR. M. May (ed)Theoretical ecology: principles and applications (2nd ed.). Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, G. H., H. R. Pulliam andE. L. Charnov (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests.Quart. Rev. Biol.52: 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D. J. (1972) Random search and insect population models.J. Anim. Ecol.41: 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royama, T. (1971) A comparative study of models for predation and parasitism.Res. Popul. Ecol. Suppl.1: 1–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W. (1982) The controversy over interspecific competition.Amer. Sci.70: 586–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimada, M. andK. Fujii (1985) Niche modification and stability of competitive systems. I. Niche modification process.Res. Poul. Ecol.27: 185–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimada, M. (1985) Niche modification and stability of competitive systems. II. Persistence of interspecific competitive systems with parasitoid wasps.Res. Popul. Ecol.27: 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih, A. (1982) Optimal patch use: variation in selective pressure for efficient foraging.Amer. Natur.120: 666–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, C. R. andA. G. Hildrew (1979) Resource partitioning by two freshwater invertebrate predators with contrasting foraging strategies.J. Anim. Ecol.48: 909–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shimada, M., Fujii, K. Niche modification and stability of competitive systems. III. Simulation model analysis. Res Popul Ecol 27, 217–230 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02515462

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02515462

Keywords

Navigation