Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparative study of models for predation and parasitism

  • Published:
Researches on Population Ecology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrewartha, H. G. andL. C. Birch (1954)The distribution and abundance of animals. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, C. I. andR. A. Fisher (1953) Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data and note on the efficient fitting of the negative binomial.Biometrics9: 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Born, M. (1964)Natural philosophy of cause and chance. Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, T. (1956) Effects of natural temperatures on oviposition of various numbers of an insect parasite (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidae, Tenthredinidae).Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer.49: 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, T. (1958) Effect of host distribution on the reproduction ofEncarsia formosaGahan (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidae).Can. Ent.90: 179–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnside, W. (1928)Theory of probability (1959 ed.). Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. N. (1931)Animal ecology. McGraw-Hill, New York & London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. J. (1956) Grouping in spatial distributions.Science123: 373–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. J. andF. C. Evans (1954) Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationship in populations.Ecology35: 445–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S. (1957)Discoveries and opinions ofGalileo. Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducasse, C. J. (1960)Francis Bacon's philosophy of science. Chapter 3 in “Theories of scientific method: Renaissance through the nineteenth century” Univ. Washington Press, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, C. (1935) Review ofA. J. Lotka (1934).J. Anim. Ecol.4: 148–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamow, G. (1962)Gravity. Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gause, G. F. (1934)The struggle for existence. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, K. J. andC. S. Holling (1969) A competition submodel for parasites and predators.Can. Ent.101: 785–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M. P. andG. C. Varley (1969) New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control.Nature223: 1133–1137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, D. L. andP. Sisojevic (1966) Predatory behavior ofPhilodromus rufusWalckenaer (Arneae: Thomisidae).Can. Ent.98: 113–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R. A. (1966)Animal Behavior. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1959a) The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European pine sawfly.Can. Ent.91: 293–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1959b) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism.Can. Ent.91: 385–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1961) Principles of insect predation.Ann. Rev. Ent.6: 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1966) The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density.Mem. Ent. Soc. Can.48: 3–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffaker, C. B. andC. E. Kennett (1969) Some aspects of assessing efficiency of natural enemies.Can. Ent.101: 425–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itô, Y. (1963)Dōbutsu Seitai-gaku Nyūmon [Introduction to animal ecology]. Kokin-shoin, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivlev, V. S. (1955)Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes (English translation byD. Scott 1961). Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, J. (1937) Host finding by insect parasites. I. Observations on the finding of hosts byAlysia manducator, Mormoneilla vitripennis, andTrichogramma evanescens.J. Anim. Ecol.6: 298–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A. J. (1925)Elements of physical biology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. A. (1960) The interaction of the spruce budworm,Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), and the parasiteGlypta fumiferana (Vier.).Can. Ent.92: 839–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, A. (1957) Theories of natural control of insect populations.Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.22: 253–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. F. (1963) The effect of predator age and prey defence on the functional response ofPodisus maculiventrisSay to the density ofHyphantria cuneaDrury.Can. Ent.95: 1009–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morisita, M. (1954) Estimation of population density by spacing method.Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. E1: 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A. J. (1933) The balance of animal populations.J. Anim. Ecol.2: 132–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A. J. andV. A. Bailey (1935) The balance of animal populations. Part 1.Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1935, Part3: 551–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, R. (1956) Analogy in science.Amer. Psychol.11: 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, R. (1927) The growth of populations.Quart. Rev. Biol.2: 532–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. (1952)Science and hypothesis (English ed.). Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1955)Mathematics and plausible reasoning. Vol. 2. Patterns of plausible inference. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royama, T. (1966) Mathematical models of predatory behaviour in population dynamics. (In Japanese.)Biol. Sci., Tokyo,18: 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royama, T. (1969) A model for the global variation of clutch size in birds.Oikos20: 562–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royama, T. (1970) Factors governing the hunting behaviour and selection of food by the great tit,Parus major L.J. Anim. Ecol.39: 619–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. M. (1961)Soil conditions and plant growth (9th ed.) Longmans, Norwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1967)Invention and the evolution of ideas. Butler & Tanner, Frome & London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. S. (1939) Insect populations in relations to biological control.Ecol Monogr.9: 311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds, F. J. (1943) Occurrence of superparasitism inNemeritis canescens Rev. Can. Biol.2: 15–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoy, R. H. (1932) Appendix toG. Salt (1932) [Superparasitism byCollyria calcitratorGrav.].Bull. Ent. Res.23: 215–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. R. (1924) La théorie mathématique de l'action des parasites entomophages et le facteur du hassard.Ann. Fac. Sci. Marseille2: 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. R. (1939) Biological control and the theories of the interaction of populations.Parasitology31: 299–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, L. andH. Klomp (1960) The natural control of insects in pinewoods. II. Conditions for damping of Nicholson oscillations in parasite-host systems.Arch. neérl. Zool.13: 344–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N. (1951)The study of instinct. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torii, T. (1956)Konchū-Shūdan no Suikei-h5 Statistical analysis of insect populations]. Chapter 7 in “Seitai-gaku Gaisetsu” [Outline of ecology], (ed. byN. Yagi andK. Nomura). Yoken-do, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1961)Foresight and understanding. Harper (Torchbook ed. 1963), New York & Evanston.

  • Ullyett, G. C. (1947) Mortality factors in populations ofPluttella maculipennisCurtis (Tineidae: Lep.), and their relation to the problem of control.Ent. Mem., Dep. Agr. Forest., Union of South Africa 2 (part 6): pp. 202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullyett, G. C. (1949a) Distribution of progeny byChelonus texanusCress. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).Can. Ent.81: 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullyett, G. C. (1949b) Distribution of progeny byCryptus inornattusPratt (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae).Can. Ent.81: 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhurst, P. E. (1838) Notice sur la loi que la population suit dans son accroissement.Corresp. Math. Phys.10: 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volterra, V. (1926) Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d'individui in specie animali conviventi.Mem. R. Accad. Naz. dei Lincei, Ser. VI, Vol. 2 [English translation inChapman 1931].

  • Walker, M. (1963)The nature of scientific thought. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, K. E. F. (1959) A mathematical model for the effect of densities of attacked and attacking species on the number attacked.Can. Ent.91: 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, K. E. F. (1961) Mathematical models for use in insect pest control.Can. Ent. Suppl.19: 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, K. E. F. (1962) Use of mathematics in population ecology.Ann. Rev. Ent.7: 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, K. E. F. (1968)Ecology and resource management. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. B. (1964)Patterns in the balance of nature and related problems in quantitative ecology. Academic Press, London & New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Canadian Forestry Service, P. O. Box 4000, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada

    T. Royama

Authors
  1. T. Royama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Royama, T. A comparative study of models for predation and parasitism. Res Popul Ecol 13 (Suppl 1), 1–91 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511547

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511547

Keywords

Search

Navigation