Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Individual personality-related characteristics of event-related EEG potentials recorded in an experimental situation requiring production of time intervals

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Event-related EEG potentials (ERP) were recorded from 75 tested adult men and women; recording was performed from C3 and C4 points. The experimental situation required internal counting of time intervals limited by two pushes of a button. The experimental paradigm provided a substantial level of uncertainty, and a high level of attention needed to be maintained. The tested subjects were not informed by the experimenter about the precise value of the preset time interval; they knew only its limits, 17–23 sec. The subject obtained information about the agreement or disagreement between the produced interval and its value preset by the experimenter by visual feedback signals obtained 2 sec after termination of counting; in the case of agreement the subject had to perform a confirming (third) push of the button. Pushes were preceded by readiness potentials (RP); contingent negative variation (CNV) developed before the feedback signals, and the latter were accompanied by P300 potentials. Significant positive correlations were found between the parameters of RP and P300 in both hemispheres. In general, ERP were characterized by very high interindividual variability, which in a few respects correlated with the personality-related characteristics of tested subjects evaluated by psychological testing with the use of corresponding questionnaires. In particular, under the experimental conditions used, negative correlations were observed between the RP amplitude and psychotism indices, CNV amplitude and emotional stability; CNV amplitude and extroversive features, and P300 amplitude and domination properties of a person. Positive correlations were observed between the CNV amplitude and autia factor (according to Eysenck’s PEN and Cattell’s 16 PF questionnaires). We suppose that correlations between the personal psychical features and ERP parameters are grounded in both inherited constitutional specificities of the nervous system and neurochemical/structural modifications in the brain determined by the acquired vital experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Shagass,Evoked Potentials in the Norm and Pathology [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Brandeis and D. Lehmann, “Event-related potentials of the brain and cognitive processes: approaches and applications,”Neuropsychologia,24, No. 1, 151–168 (1986).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. V. V. Gnezditskii,Evoked Brain Potentials in Clinical Practice [in Russian], Taganrog Radiotekh. Univ., Taganrog (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Papakostopoulos, N. Banerji, and P. Pocock, “Brain electrical potentials during goal-directed self-paced skilled performance in Parkinson’s disease,”J. Psychophysiol.,3, No. 1, 94 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. E. Kanounikov, “Contingent negative variation (CNV) as an electrophysiological index of mental activity. Communication II: Psychophysiological significance and neurogenesis of the CNV characteristics,”Fiziol. Cheloveka,6, No. 3, 520–530 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Donchin, “The orienting reflex and P300,”Psychophysiology,19, No. 5, 547 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Donchin and M. Coles, “Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?”Behav. Brain Sci.,11, No. 3, 357–373 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Polich, “P300 in clinical applications: meaning, method and measurement,”Am. J. EEG Technol.,31, No. 3, 201–231 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. V. Garkavenko, L. I. Limanskaya, R. A. Vasil’eva, and E. A. Vashchenko, “Influence of the stimulation intensity on the variability of and interrelations between some late components of somatosensory evoked potentials in humans,”Fiziol. Zh.,36, No. 6, 23–27 (1990).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Birbaumer, T. Elbert, A. Canavan, and B. Rocstron, “Slow potentials of the cerebral cortex and behavior,”Physiol. Rev.,70, No. 1, 1–41 (1990).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Polich and S. Martin, “P300, cognitive capability and personality: a correlational study of university undergraduates,”Person. Indiv. Diff.,13, No. 5, 533–543 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. M. Cahill and J. Polich, “P300, probability and introverted/extroverted personality types,”Biol. Psychol.,33, No. 1, 23–25 (1992).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. E. J. Damen and C. H. Brunia, “Changes in heart rate and slow brain potentials related to motor preparation and stimulus anticipation in a time estimation task,”Psychophysiology,24, No. 6, 700–713 (1987).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. N. F. Suvorov and O. P. Tairov,Psychophysiological Mechanisms of Selective Attention [in Russian], Nauka, Leningrad (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. M. Kabanov, A. E. Lichko, and W. M. Smirnov,Techniques of Psychological Diagnostics and Correction in Clinics [in Russian], Meditsina, Leningrad (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. M. Rusalov,A Questionnaire of the Temperament Structure [in Russian], IP of Rossiisk. Akad. Nauk, Smysl, Moscow (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  17. I. N. Konareva, S. A. Makhin, and V. B. Pavlenko, “An experimental psychophysiological study of temporal perception,”Tavricheskii Zh. Psikhiat.,2, No. 4, 44–47 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Donchin and E. Heffley, “The independence of the P300 and the CNV reviewed: a reply to Wastell,”Biol. Psychol.,9, No. 3, 177–188 (1979).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. H. Eysenck and M. Eysenck,Personality and Individual Differences. A Natural Science Approach, Plenum Press, New York-London (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. M. Mel’nikov and L. T. Yampol’skii,Introduction to Experimental Psychology of Personality [in Russian], Prosveshcheniye, Moscow (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Gray, “Neuropsychology of temperament,”Inostr. Psikhol.,1, No. 6, 24–36 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  22. V. G. Sidyakin, V. B. Pavlenko, and V. B. Koulichenko, “Activity of the neurons of the parietal associative cortex and aminergic cells of the midbrain in cats upon the performance of a voluntary movement,”Neurofiziologiya/Neurophysiology,30, No. 6, 496–499 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. Jones, “The role of afferent activity in the maintenance of primate neocortical function,”J. Exp. Biol.,153, 155–176 (1990).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. V. M. Storozhuk, “The system of synaptic influences on neocortical neurons upon the performance of a conditioned reflex,”Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,40, No. 5, 819–833 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Simferopol’, Crimean Autonomous Republic, Vernadskii National University, Ukraine

    V. B. Pavlenko & I. N. Konareva

Authors
  1. V. B. Pavlenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. N. Konareva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pavlenko, V.B., Konareva, I.N. Individual personality-related characteristics of event-related EEG potentials recorded in an experimental situation requiring production of time intervals. Neurophysiology 32, 38–44 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02515167

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02515167

Keywords

Search

Navigation