Strength of Materials

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 99–103 | Cite as

Effect of annealing on the microstructure, room-temperature strength, and fracture toughness of Al2O3−ZrO2−TiN ceramics

  • D. Yu. Ostrovoi
  • N. A. Orlovskaya
  • V. V. Kovylyaev
  • S. A. Firstov
Scientific and Technical Section


The microstructure, phase composition, room-temperature flexural strength, and fracture toughness of Al2O3−ZrO2−TiN (AZT) ceramics were studied on specimens annealed in air at 1000, 1200, and 1400°C. The strength of the ceramics decreased with annealing temperature. The degradation in strength was caused by defects formed on or near the surface of the ceramics during oxidation of TiN which started at 600–700°C. The surface defects after annealing are influenced by the formation of rutile (TiO2) at 1000 and 1200°C, aluminum titanate (Al2TiO5), and titanium suboxide Ti5O9 at 1400°C as well as by diffusion processes associated with ZrO2. If the annealing of smooth AZT specimens in air resulted in lower strength, specimens in the form of single-edge notched beam (SENB) exhibited a considerable increase in fracture toughness (K Ic) with annealing temperature. Such behavior was caused by the formation of an oxide layer which hindered the propagation of the main crack from the notch base. Thermal treatment of the smooth AZT specimens and further edge notching and testing did not result in a change of K Ic values. The Al2O3 and Al2O3−ZrO2 ceramics were also tested for comparison.


Fracture Toughness Rutile Tungsten Oxide Main Crack Titanium Nitride 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    N. Claussen, “Fracture toughness of Al2O3 with an unstabilized ZrO2 dispersed phase,”J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,59, No. 1-2, 49–51 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Orange, G. Fantozzi, P. Homerin, F. Thevenot, A. Leriche and F. Cambier, “Preparation and characterization of a dispersion toughened ceramic for thermomechanical uses (ZTA). Pt II: Thermomechanical characterization. Effect of microstructure and temperature on toughening mechanisms,”J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.,9, No. 3, 177–185 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Bellosi, G. de Portu, and S. Guicciardi, “Preparation and properties of electroconductive Al2O3-based composites,”J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.,10, No. 4, 307–315 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu. Gogotsi, O. Grigor’ev, N. Orlovskaya, D. Ostrovoi, and V. Yaroshenko, “Toughened Al2O3-based ceramics,”Ogneupory, No. 11, 10–13 (1989).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Z. S. Rak and P. J. van Tilborg, “Effect of TiN and SiC on the mechanical properties of ZTA ceramics,” in: P. Duran and J. F. Fernandez, eds., Third Euro-Ceramics, Vol. 3, Faenza Editrice Iberica S. L., Faenza, Spain (1993), pp. 767–772.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Arahori, T. Suzuki, N. Iwamoto, and N. Umesaki, “Transformation behaviour of ZrO2 in Al2O3−ZrO2 composites,” in: S. Somia, N. Yamamoto and H. Yanagida, eds,Advances in Ceramics, Vol. 24, Science and Technology of Zirconia III, The American Ceramic Society, Inc., Westerville, Ohio (1988), pp. 549–558.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Basu, S. Chatterjee, M. K. Sinha, and M. K. Basu, “Effect of grinding and subsequent annealing on the properties of transformation-toughened alumina ceramics,”J. Mater. Sci. Lett.,11, No. 9, 564–566 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. A. Gogotsi, “Test methods of advanced ceramics—reasonable approaches to certification of ceramics,”Key Eng. Mater.,56–57, 419–434 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Orlovskaya, G. Krivoshei, O. Babii, and D. Ostrovoi, “Effect of annealing on microstructure, phase composition, and failure of Al2O3−ZrO2 ceramics at room temperature,”J. Mater. Sci. Lett.,15, No. 2, 166–169 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. F. Lange, “Compressive surface stresses developed in ceramics by an oxidation-induced phase change,”J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,63, No. 1, 38–42 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu. G. Gogotsi and V. A. Lavrenko,Corrosion of High-Performance Ceramics, Springer Verlag, Berlin (1992).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu. Gogotsi, F. Porz, and V. Yaroshenko, “Mechanical properties and oxidation behaviour of Al2O3−AlN−TiN composites,”J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,75, No. 8, 2251–2259 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Tampieri, E. Landi, and A. Bellosi, “The oxidation behaviour of monolithic TiN ceramics,”Br. Ceram. Trans. J.,90, No. 6, 194–196 (1991).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. F. Voitovich,Oxidation of Carbides and Nitrides [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1981).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Yu. Ostrovoi
    • 1
  • N. A. Orlovskaya
    • 2
  • V. V. Kovylyaev
    • 2
  • S. A. Firstov
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Problems of StrengthNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKievUkraine
  2. 2.Institute for Problems of Materials ScienceNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKievUkraine

Personalised recommendations