Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ultrasound velocity of the tibia in normal german women and hip fracture patients

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the latest developments in quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is the measurement of the speed of sound (SOS) of cortical bone of the midtibia. To determine the diagnostic validity of this method we measured 150 healthy women aged 22–94 years. Additionally, we report on first results of patients with hip fracture. Precisionin vivo of the tibial QUS expressed as the percentage coefficient of variation (CV) was 0.39% for the first day and 0.45% after repositioning the second day (mean CV=0.42%). No significant dependency of tibial SOS was found with weight, height, and body mass index in pre- and postmenopausal women. There was a significant decline of SOS with age in postmenopausal women (SOS=4225–5.3 age, r=−0.46,P<0.001), whereas premenopausal women showed no decline (SOS=3906+1.3 age, r=0.13, ns) Mean SOS values of premenopausal women were significantly higher than those of postmenopausal women (3960±78.7 m/second and 3898±120 m/second, respectively,P<0.001). Postmenopausal women on estrogen substitution had significantly higher mean tibial SOS values than age-comparable postmenopausal women without estrogen substitution (3980±99 m/second and 3869±100 m/second, respectively,P<0.001). Significant difference between age-matched healthy women, n=11, and hip fracture patients, n=13, expressed as z-score of −1.4 SD was found. In conclusion, tibial QUS declines with age and detects higher values in premenopausal women and postmenopausal women on estrogen substitution and lower values in hip fracture patients. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify its role in fracture risk assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reiners C (1991) Nicht-invasive quantitative Knochendich-tebestimmung. In: Ringe JD (ed) Osteoporose. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 157–216

    Google Scholar 

  2. Need AG, Nordin BEC (1990) Which bone to measure? Osteoporosis Int 1:3–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cummings SR, Black D (1986) Should perimenopausal women be screened for osteoporosis? Ann Int Med 104:817–823

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Melton LJ III, Wahner HW, Riggs BL (1988) Bone density measurement. Ann Int Med 108:481–482

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tavakoli MB, Evans JA (1991) Dependence of the velocity and attenuation of ultrasound in bone on the mineral content. Phys Med Biol 36(11):1529–1537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Heaney RP, Avioli LV, Chestnut CH III, Lappe J, Recker RR, Brandenburger GH (1989) Osteoporotic bone fragility: detection by ultrasound transmission velocity. JAMA 261:2986–2990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Waud CE, Lew R, Baran DT (1992) The relationship between ultrasound and densitometric measurements of bone mass at the calcaneus in women. Calcif Tissue Int 51:415–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Genant HK, Faulkner KG, Glüer C (1991) Measurement of bone mineral density: current status. Am J Med 91 (suppl 5): 49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldstein SA, Goulet R, McCubbrey D (1993) Measurement and significance of three-dimensional architecture in the mechanical integrity of trabecular bone. Calcif Tissue Int 53 (suppl 1):127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Glüer CC, Wu CY, Jergas M, Goldstein SA, Genant HK (1994) Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure. Calcif Tissue Int 55:46–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Turner CH, Peacock M, Timmerman L, Neal JM, Johnston CC Jr (1995) Calcaneal ultrasonic measurements discriminate hip fracture independently of bone mass. Osteoporosis Int 5:130–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mautalen C, Vega E, González D, Carrilero P, Ontaño A, Silberman F (1995) Ultrasound and dual x-ray absorptiometry densitometry in women with hip fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 57:165–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Genant HK, Stone K (1995) Quantitative ultrasound and vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 10:353–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamazaki K, Kushida K, Ohmura A, Sano M, Inoue T (1994) Ultrasound bone densitometry of the os calcis in Japanese women. Osteoporosis Int 4:220–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart A, Reid DM, Porter RW (1994) Broadband ultrasound attenuation and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in patients with hip fractures: Which technique discriminates fracture risk? Calcif Tissue Int 54:446–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wallach S, Feinblatt JD, Avioli LV (1992) The bone “quality” problem (editorial). Calcif Tissue Int 51:169–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wapniarz M, Lehmann R, Banik N, Radwan M, Klein K, Allolio B (1993) Apparent velocity of ultrasound (AVU) of the patella in comparison to bone mineral density at the lumbar spine in normal males and females. Bone Miner 23:243–252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Young H, Howey S, Purdie DW (1993) Broadband ultrasound attenuation compared with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in screening for postmenopausal low bone density. Osteoporosis Int 3:160–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Herd R, Ramalingham T, Ryan P, Fogelman I, Blake G (1992) Measurements of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in the calcaneus in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 2:247–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vesterby A, Mosekilde L, Gunderson H, Melsen F, Mosekilde LE, Holme K, Sørensen S (1991) Biological meaningful determinants of in vitro strength of lumbar vertebrae. Bone 12: 219–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wüster Chr, Paetzold W, Scheidt-Nave Chr, Brandt K, Ziegler R (1994) Equivalent diagnostic validity of ultrasound and dual-x-ray-absorptiometry in a clinical case-comparison study of women with vertebral osteoporosis. JBMR 9 (suppl 1): A384

    Google Scholar 

  22. Butz S, Wüster Chr, Scheidt-Nave Chr, Götz M, Ziegler R (1994) Forearm BMD as measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) in a German Reference Population. Osteoporosis Int 4:179–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lilley J, Walters BG, Heath DA, Drolc Z (1991) In vivo and in vitro precision for bone density measured by dual-energy x-ray absorption. Osteoporosis Int 1:141–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Libermann UA, Rimon AB, Keinan D (1995) Ultrasound measurements along the tibia: age-related changes in normal female and male populations and correlations to postmenopausal osteoporotic (PMO) patients. Bone 16 (suppl 1):A148

    Google Scholar 

  25. Foldes AJ, Popovtzer MM (1995) Ultrasonic measurements of the tibia: clinical evaluation. Bone 16 (suppl 1):A150

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wüster Chr, Brandt K, Paetzold W, Scheidt-Nave Chr, Leidig G, Götz M, Ziegler R (1993) Ultrasound of the os calcis for osteoporosis risk assessment. JBMR 8 (suppl 1):A955

    Google Scholar 

  27. Orgee J, McCloskey EV, Foster H, Coombes G, Khan S, Kanis JA (1994) Tibial ultrasound velocity—a useful clinical measure of skeletal status. J Bone Miner Res 9 (suppl 1): A143.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Damilakis JE, Drettakis E, Gourtsoyiannis NC (1992) Ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus in the female population: normative data. Calcif Tissue Int 51:180–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wüster C, Duckeck G, Ugurel A, et al. (1992) Bone mass of spine and forearm in osteoporosis and in German normals: influence of sex, age and anthropometric parameters. Eur J Clin Invest 22:366–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mazess RB, Barden HS (1990) Interrelationships among bone densitometry sites in normal young women. Bone Miner 11: 347–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lehmann R, Wapniarz M, Kvasnicka HM, Klein K, Allolio B (1993) Velocity of ultrasound at the patella: influence of age, menopause and estrogen replacement therapy. Osteoporosis Int 3:308–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Naessén T, Mallmin H, Ljunghall S (1995) Heel ultrasound in women after long-term ERT compared with bone densities in the forearm, spine and hip. Osteoporosis Int 5:205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schott AM, Weill-Engerer S, Hans D, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD, Meunier PJ (1995) Ultrasound discriminates patients with hip fracture equally well as dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and independently of bone mineral density. JBMR 10(2):243–249

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Alenfeld FE, Wüster Chr, Beck C, Ziegler R (1995) Diagnostic value of ultrasound measurements of bone mineral density on the metacarpals in healthy and osteoporotic subjects. Bone 16 (suppl 1):A247

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wüster Ch, Pereira-Lima J, Beck C, Götz M, Paetzold W, Brandt K, Scheidt-Nave Ch, Ziegler R (1995) Quantitative ultrasdiale densitometric (QUS) zus osteoporose. Risiko, Beusteilung, Refereuzdateu für versduedeue Meßstellen. Grenzeu und Gusatzmoglidikeiten. Der Frauenarzt, 1304–1314

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine I (Endocrinology and Metabolism), University of Heidelberg, Luisenstr. 5, Gebäude 8, D-69115, Heidelberg, Germany

    C. Funck, Chr Wüster, F. E. Alenfeld, J. F. S. Pereira-Lima, M. Götz & R. Ziegler

  2. Department of Surgery (Traumatology), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    T. Fritz & P. J. Meeder

Authors
  1. C. Funck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chr Wüster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. E. Alenfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. F. S. Pereira-Lima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. Fritz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. J. Meeder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. Götz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. R. Ziegler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Funck, C., Wüster, C., Alenfeld, F.E. et al. Ultrasound velocity of the tibia in normal german women and hip fracture patients. Calcif Tissue Int 58, 390–394 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509435

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509435

Key words

Search

Navigation