American Journal of Community Psychology

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 273–287 | Cite as

The continuity principle: A unified approach to disaster and trauma

  • Haim Omer
  • Nahman Alon
Article

Abstract

The continuity principle stipulates that through all stages of disaster, management and treatment should aim at preserving and restoring functional, historical, and interpersonal continuities, at the individual, family, organization, and community levels. Two misconceptions work against this principle and lead to decisional errors: the “abnormalcy bias” which results in underestimating victims' ability to cope with disaster, and the “normalcy bias” which results in underestimating the probability or extent of expected disruption. This article clarifies these biases and details the potential contributions of the continuity principle at the different stages of the disaster.

Key words

continuity principle disaster trauma 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alon, N. (1985). An Ericksonian approach to the treatment of chronic post-traumatic patients. In J. K. Zeit (Ed.),Ericksonian psychotherapy (Vol. 2). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  2. Averill, J. (1973). Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress.Psychological Bulletin, 80, 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow, D. H. (1988).Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Breslau, N., Davis, G. C., Andreski, P., & Peterson, E. (1991). Traumatic events and posttraumatic stress disorder in an urban population of young adults.Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 216–222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Breuer, J., & Freud, S. (1895). Studies in hysteria. In J. Strachey (Ed.),The complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Standard Edition (Vol. 2). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DaVerona, M., & Omer, H. (1992). Reversing chronic processes with mental patients: An interpersonal perspective.Psychotherapy, 29, 355–365.Google Scholar
  8. Drabek, T. E. (1986).Human system responses to disaster: An inventory of sociological findings. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. Elias, M. J., Gara, M., Ubriaco, M., Rothbaum, P. A., Clabby, J. F., & Schuyler, T. (1986). Impact of a preventive social problem solving intervention on children's coping with middle-school stressors.American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 259–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freedy, J. R., Kilpatrick, D. G. & Resnick, H. S. (1993). Natural disasters and mental health: Theory, assessment and intervention.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 49–104.Google Scholar
  11. Goldfried, M. R. (1980). Toward the delineation of therapeutic change principles.American Psychologist, 35, 991–999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Granot, H. (1993). Anti-social behavior reconsidered.Disaster Management, 5, 142–144.Google Scholar
  13. Gray, J. A. (1982).The neuropsychology of anxiety. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Green, B. L., Wilson, J. P., & Lindy, J. D., (1985). Conceptualizing post-traumatic stress disorder: A psychosocial framework. In C. R. Figley (Ed.)Trauma and its wake: the study and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (pp. 53–69). New York: Bruner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  15. Heller, K. (1990). Social and community intervention.Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 141–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horowitz, M. J. (1986).Stress response syndromes (2nd. ed.). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  17. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1989). Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: applications of the schema construct.Social Cognition, 7, 113–136.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, N. R. (1988). Fire in a crowded theater: a descriptive investigation of the emergence of panic.International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 61, 7–26.Google Scholar
  19. Kiyuna, R. S., Kopriva, R. J., & Farr, S. J. (1993). The experiential learning model as a conceptual framework for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 105–116.Google Scholar
  20. Kolb, L. C. (1987). A neuropsychological hypothesis explaining posttraumatic stress disorders.American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 989–995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Levav, I., Greenfied, H., & Baruch, E. (1979). Psychiatric combat reactions during the Yom Kippur war.American Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 637–641.Google Scholar
  22. McCann, I. L., & Pearlman, L. A. (1990).Psychological trauma and the adult survivor, New York: Bruner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  23. Messer, S. B. (1986). Eclecticism in psychotherapy: Underlying assumptions problems and trade-offs. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.)Handbook of selective psychotherapy (pp. 379–397). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  24. Nehnevajsa, J., & Wong, H. (1977).Flood preparedness 1977: A Pittsburgh area study. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Center for Urban Research.Google Scholar
  25. Omer, H. (1991). Tasks of a psychological emergency team in disaster [In Hebrew].Sihot, 5, 1–23.Google Scholar
  26. Perry, R. W., & Greene, M. R. (1983).Citizen response to volcanic eruptions: The case of Mount St. Helens. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  27. Perry, R. W., Lindell, M. K., & Greene, M. R. (1981).Evacuation planning in emergency management. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  28. Perry, R. W., Lindell, M. K., & Greene, M. R., (1982). Threat perception and public response to volcano hazard.Journal of Social Psychology, 116, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Quarantelli, E. L. (1980).Evacuation behavior and problems: Findings and implications from the research literature. Columbus: Disaster Research Center, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  30. Quarantelli, E. L. (1982). Social and organizational problems in a major community emergency.Emergency Planning Digest, 9, 7–10.Google Scholar
  31. Quarantelli, E. L., & Dynes, R. R. (1970). Property norms and looting: Their patterns in community crisis.Phylon, 31, 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raphael, B., & Middleton, W. (1987). Mental health responses in a decade of disasters: Australia, 1974–1983.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 38, 1331–1337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rook, K., & Dooley, D. (1985). Applying social support research: theoretical problems and future directions.Journal of Social Issues, 41, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwartz, R. A., & Prout, M. F. (1991). Integrative approaches in treatment of PTSD.Psychotherapy, 28, 364–373.Google Scholar
  35. Seligman, M. E. P. (1975).Helplessness. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  36. Sgroi, S. M., & Bunk, B. S. (1988). A clinical approach to adult survivors of child sexual abuse. In S. M. Sgroi (Ed.),Vulnerable populations: Evaluation and treatment of sexually abused children and adult survivors (Vol. 1, pp. 137–186). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  37. Solomon, Z., & Benbenishty, R. (1986). The role of proximity, immediacy, and expectancy in frontline treatment of combat stress reaction among Israelis in the Lebanon war.American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 613–617.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haim Omer
    • 1
  • Nahman Alon
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTel Aviv UniversityRamat-AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations