Abstract
Presents 12-month follow-up results from an outreach/linkage intervention with persons who are homeless and mentally ill, contrasting these with results obtained at 4 months. Both sets reflect the success of the program in placing individuals in independent housing. However, longer term data provide useful information regarding client movement patterns and increased tenure in nonhomeless living arrangements beyond the termination of specialized services. Analyses of 12-month residential outcomes identified four variables as significant predictors: recruitment source, project service duration, CMH service duration, and client age. In contrast to 4-month predictors, variables reflecting baseline client functioning were no longer significantly related to outcome, suggesting that the positive effects of the intervention may take longer to achieve with some clients. Discussion focuses on the implications of these effectiveness results for future research designs and measures as well as the utility and limitations of preexperimental approaches for evaluating innovative service models when implementation and efficacy experiences are lacking.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agresti, A. (1990).Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
Barrow, S. M., Hellman, F., Lowell, A. M., Plapinger, J., & Struening, E. L. (1989).Effectiveness of programs for the mentally ill homeless. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.
Barrow, S. M., Hellman, F., Lovell, A. M., Plapinger, J. D., & Struening, E. L. (1991). Evaluating outreach services: Lessons from a study of five programs. In N. L. Cohen (Ed.),Psychiatric outreach to the mentally ill. New directions for mental health services (No. 52, pp. 29–46). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Blankertz, L. E., & Cnaan, R. A. (1992). Principles of care for dually diagnosed homeless persons: Findings from a demonstration project.Research on Social Work Practice, 2, 448–464.
Brickner, P. W., & Scanlan, B. C. (1990). Health care for homeless persons: Creation and implementation of a program. In P. W. Brickner et al. (Eds.),Under the safety net (pp. 3–14). New York: Norton.
Bybee, D., Mowbray, C. T., & Cohen, E. (1994). Evaluation of a homeless mentally ill outreach program: Differential short-term effects.Evaluation and Program Planning, in press.
Carling, P. J. (1992). Homes or group homes? Future approaches to housing, support and integration for people with psychiatric disabilities.Adult Residential Care Journal, 6(2), 87–96.
Caton, C. L. M., Wyatt, R. J., Grunberg, J., & Felix, A. (1990). An evaluation of a mental health program for homeless men.American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 286–289.
Cohen, E. H., Mowbray, C. T., Bybee, D., Yeich, S., Ribisl, K., & Freddolino, P. P. (1993). Tracking and follow-up methods for research on homelessness.Evaluation Review, 17, 333–354.
Cohen, J. (1982). Set correlation as a general multivariate data-analysis method.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 301–341.
Cohen, J. (1989). SETCOR: A supplementary module for SYSTAT and SYGRAPH. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT, Inc.
Dennis, D., Buckner, J. C., Lipton, F. R., & Levine, I. S. (1991). A decade of research and services for homeless mentally ill persons: Where do we stand?American Psychologist, 46, 1129–1138.
Drake, R. E., Osher, F. C., & Wallach, M. A. (1991). Homelessness and dual diagnosis.American Psychologist, 46, 1149–1158.
First, R. J., Rife, J. C., & Kraus, S. (1990). Case management with people who are homeless and mentally ill: Preliminary findings from an NIMH demonstration project.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 14(2), 87–91.
Federal Task Force on Homelessness and Severe Mental Illness. (1992).Outcasts on main street (ADM 92-1904). Washington, DC: Interagency Council on the Homeless and U. S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.
Goering, P., Wasylenki, D., St. Onge, P., Paduchak, D., & Lancee, W. J. (1992). Gender differences among clients of a case management program for the homeless.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 43, 160–165.
Goldman, Howard. (1992, November).Preliminary outcome data from Robert Wood Johnson Demonstration project sites. American Public Health Association Conference, Washington, DC.
Hazel, K., Herman, S. E., & Mowbray, C. T. (1991). Characteristics of adults with serious mental illness in a public mental health system.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 42, 518–525.
Hensher, C., & Johnson, L. W. (1981).Applied discrete choice modeling. London: Croom Helm.
Hyde, A. P., & Goldman, C. (1993). Common family issues that interfere with the treatment and rehabilitation of people with schizophrenia.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16, 63–74.
Leda, C., & Rosenheck, R. (1992). Mental health status and community adjustment after treatment in a residential treatment program for homeless veterans.American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 1219–1224.
Lefley, H. P. (1993). A family perspective on rehabilitation. In P. W. Flexer & P. Solomon (Eds.),Psychiatric rehabilitation in practice (pp. 17–30). Boston: Andover.
Lipton, F. R., Nutt, S., & Sabatini, A. (1988). Housing the homeless mentally ill: A longitudinal study of a treatment approach.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 39, 40–45.
Marcus, L. R., Cohen, N. L., Nardacci, D., & Brittain, J. (1990).American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 1557–1561.
Mercier, C., Fournier, L., & Peladeau, N. (1992). Program evaluation of services for the homeless: Challenges and strategies.Evaluation and Program Planning, 15, 417–426.
Mowbray, C. T., Bybee, D., & Cohen, E. (1993). Describing the homeless mentally ill: Cluster analysis results.American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 67–93.
Mowbray, C. T., Cohen, E., & Bybee, D. (1991). Services to individuals who are homeless and mentally ill: Implementation evaluation. In D. Rog (Ed.),Evaluating programs for the homeless. New directions for program evaluation (No. 52, pp. 75–90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mowbray, C. T., Cohen, E., & Bybee, D. (1993). The challenge of outcome evaluation in homeless services: Engagement as an intermediate outcome measure.Evaluation and Program Planning, 16, 337–346.
Mowbray, C. T., Cohen, E., Harris, S. N., Trosch, S., Johnson, S., & Duncan, B. (1992). Serving the homeless mentally ill: Mental Health Linkage.Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 215–227.
Newman, S. J. (1992).The severely mentally ill homeless: Housing needs and housing policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Institute for Policy Studies (Occasional Paper No. 12).
Rife, J. C., First, R. J., Greenlee, R. W., Miller, L. D., & Feichter, M. A. (1991). Case management with homeless mentally ill people.Health and Social Work, 16, 58–67.
Rosenheck, R., & Gallup, P. (1991). Involvement in an outreach and residential treatment program for homeless mentally ill veterans.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 179, 750–754.
Sosin, M., Piliavin, I., & Westerfelt, H. (1990). Toward a longitudinal analysis of homelessness.Journal of Social Issues, 46, 157–174.
Steinberg, D., & Colla, P. (1991).LOGIT: A supplementary module for SYSTAT. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT, Inc.
Toomey, B. G., First, R. J., Rife, J. C., & Belcher, J. R. (1989). Evaluating community care for homeless mentally ill people.Social Work Research and Abstracts, 25(4), 21–26.
Wright, J. D. (1990). The health of homeless people. Evidence from the National Health Care for the Homeless Program. In P. W. Brickner et al. (Eds.),Under the safety net (pp. 15–31). New York: Norton.
Yeich, S., Mowbray, C. T., Bybee, D., & Cohen, E. (1994). The case for a supported housing approach: Consumer housing and support preferences.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal (in press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health, #H87 MH44373, to the Michigan Department of Mental Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bybee, D., Mowbray, C.T. & Cohen, E. Short versus longer term effectiveness of an outreach program for the homeless mentally Ill. Am J Commun Psychol 22, 181–209 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506862
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506862