Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative assessment of the dynamic and static methods of determining the elastic properties of rocks

  • Rock Mechanics and Rock Pressure
  • Published:
Soviet mining science Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    The modulus of elasticity and the shear modulus, as found by the dynamic method, are objective properties of the rock and are independent of the experimental conditions and the characteristics of the apparatus.

  2. 2.

    Dynamic methods of determining the elastic properties of a rock have advantages over static methods: they are easier and simpler to use, more accurate, preserve the rock specimen, and can be used in a mine.

  3. 3.

    The dynamically measured elastic characteristics of a rock can be used as parameters for the solution of problems in rock pressure and rock fracture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Methods of Laboratory Determination of the Indices of Static Elasticity of Rocks, Leningrad, Izd. VNIMI (1961).

  2. K. V. Ruppeneit, Mechanical Properties of Rocks, Moscow, Ugletekhizdat (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. P. Belikov, Elastic and Strength Properties of Rocks. Proc. of Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Petrography, Mineralogy, and Geochemistry, Moscow, Izd. AN SSSR (1961), issue 43.

    Google Scholar 

  4. O. I. Silaeva, Use of Ultrasound to Study the Velocities of Propagation of Elastic Waves and the Elastic Parameters of Rock Specimens under Uniaxial Pressure, Tr. In-ta fiziki Zemli im. O. Yu. Shmidta, Moscow, Izd. AN SSSR (1962), No. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. I. Emelin and I. S. Chuprov, Experience in the Use of Ultrasound to Determine the Dynamic Elastic parameters of Rocks in Field Conditions, Izv. AN SSSR, seriya geofiz. (1962) No. 4.

  6. L. Knopoff, On Rayleigh Wave Velocities, Bull. Seismol. Amer., 42 (1952), No. 4.

  7. V. A. Romanov, Theory of Errors and the Method of Least Squares, Moscow-Khar'kov, Ugletekhizdat (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. S. Berzon, High-Frequency Seismics, Moscow, Izd. AN SSSR (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. I. Baron and V. M. Kurbatov, On the Index of Relative Brittleness of a Rock, Izv. AN SSSR, OTN, Metallurgiya i toplivo (1959), No. 4.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. S. M. Kirov Kola Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Mining and Metallurgical Institute, Apatity, Murmansk Region, Russia

    I. A. Turchaninov & V. I. Panin

Authors
  1. I. A. Turchaninov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. I. Panin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

zsranslated from Fiziko-Tekhnicheskie Problemy Razrabotki Poleznykh Iskopaemykh, No. 2, pp. 45–53, March–April, 1966.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turchaninov, I.A., Panin, V.I. Comparative assessment of the dynamic and static methods of determining the elastic properties of rocks. Soviet Mining Science 2, 148–154 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02497752

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02497752

Keywords

Search

Navigation