Abstract
The embryogeny of the wild oat (Avena fatua L.) was studied in detail. The pattern of embryo development was observed to be similar to the other investigated grass taxa, conforming to thePoa variation of the Asterad type. The embryogeny and anatomy of young seedlings showed that the embryo of the wild oat was not monocotylous, but dicotylous. The scutellum of the embryo, as reported for other grasses, was regarded as the first cotyledon, and the first leaf primordium, which developed later into a photosynthesizing leaf and situated opposite the scutellum, was interpreted as the second cotyledon. Observations indicated that the cotyledons of the embryo were placed lateral to the shoot apical meristem, which was terminal in position. The cotyledons were found to be dimorphic in structure and function. The scutellum, a modified cotyledon, functioned as a suctorial organ, transporting nutrients from the endosperm to the embryo axis. The second cotyledon or the first true leaf supplied nutrients directly to the embryo axis through the process of photosynthesis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, W.V. 1960. The morphology of the grass embryo. Phytomorphology10: 215–223.
1965. The grass embryo: A rebuttal. Phytomorphology15: 274–284.
Crété, P. 1963. Embryo.In P. Maheshwari, ed., Recent Advances in the Embryology of Angiosperms. pp. 171–220. Intl. Soc. Plant Morphologists, University of Delhi, Delhi.
Davis, G.L. 1966. Systematic Embryology of Angiosperms. Wiley, New York.
Eames, A.J. 1961. Morphology of the Angiosperms. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Gifford, E.M. andA.S. Foster. 1989. Morphology and Evolution of Vascular Plants. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.
Guignard, J.L. 1975. Du cotylédon des monocotylédons. Phytomorphology25: 193–200.
Haccius, B. 1952. Die Embryoentwicklung beiOttelia alismoides und das Problem des terminalen Monokotylenkeimblatts. Planta45: 443–460.
Hanstein, J. 1870. Die Entwicklung des Keimes der Monokotylen und der Dikotylen. Bot. Abhandl. (Bonn)1: 1–112.
Jensen, W.A. 1962. Botanical Histochemistry. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.
Johansen, D.A. 1940. Plant Microtechnique. McGraw-Hill, Company, New York.
Johansen, D.A. 1950. Plant Embryology. Waltham, Massachusettes.
Lakshmanan, K.K. 1972. The monocot embryo.In T.M. Varghese and R.K. Grover, eds., Vistas in Plant Sciences. Vol. 2. pp. 61–110. Intl. Biol. Sci. Hissar.
Lawrence, G.H.M. 1951. Taxonomy of Vascular Plants. Macmillan Company, New York.
Natesh, S. andM.A. Rau. 1984. The Embryo.In B.M. Johri, ed., Embryology of Angiosperms. pp. 377–443. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Negbi, M. andD. Koller. 1962. Homologies in the grass embryo—a re-evaluation. Phytomorphology12: 289–296.
Raju, M.V.S. 1990. The wild oat inflorescence and Seed-Anatomy, Development and Morphology. Canadian Plains Reserch Center, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Souèges, R. 1924. Embryogenie des Graminees. Developpment de l'embryon chez lePoa annua. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris178: 860–862.
Stebbins, G.L. 1974. Flowering Plants: evolution above the species level. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusettes.
Steeves, T.A. andI.M. Sussex. 1989. Patterns in plant development. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, England.
Swamy, B.G.L. 1963. The origin of cotyledon and epicotyl inOttelia alismoides. Beitr. Biol. Pfl.39: 1–16.
1979. Embryogenesis inCheirostylis flabellata. Phytomorphology29: 199–203.
. 1962. The origin of epicotylary meristem and cotyledon inHalophila ovata Gaudich. Ann. Bot.26: 243–249.
Wardlaw, C.W. 1955. Embryogenesis in Plants. Methuen and Company, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shuma, J.M., Raju, M.V.S. Is the wild oat embryo monocotylous?. Bot Mag Tokyo 104, 15–23 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02493400
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02493400