Skip to main content
Log in

Simple correction for variable post column split ratios using pure carbon dioxide in packed column supercritical fluid chromatography with independent pressure and flow control

  • Originals
  • Supercritical Fluid Chromatography
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Packed column supercritical fluid chromatographs (SFC) with independent control of pressure and flow produce constant efficiency but suffer from variable response factors when using a post column split into a mass sensitive detector. Most of the flow passes through a backpressure regulator, but a small fraction of the flow passes through a fixed restrictor in the base of a detector like the FID. Since the flow through a fixed restrictor increases with pressure, a changing split ratio into the detector and non-linear response results. For samples requiring a pressure program to elute both light and heavy components, distorted mass distribution measurements result.

A simple correction for this variable response is presented. Restrictor flow is a linear function of pressure. Division of the FID detector signal by the current pressure corrects for variations in post column split ratios. The correction only works for constant mass flow pumps and does not work for mixed fluids, syringe pumps or reciprocating pumps with inadequate compressibility compensation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bally, R.W.; Cramers, C.A.J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. 1986,9, 626.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith, R.D.; Fulton, J.L.; Petersen, R.C.; Kopriva, A.J.; Wright, B.W.Anal. Chem. 1986,58, 2057–2064.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berger, T.A.J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. 1989,12, 96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger, T.A.Anal. Chem. 1989,61, 356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. van Deemter, J.J.; Zuiderweg, F.J.; Klinkenberg, A.Chem. Eng. Sci. 1956,5, 271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Balenovic, Z.; Myers, M.N.; Giddings, J.C.J. Chem. Physics 1970,12, 915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuller, E.N.; Giddings, J.C.Gas Chromatogr. 1965,3, 222.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuller, E.N.; Schettler, P.D.; Giddings, J.C.Ind. Eng. Chem. 1966,58, 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berger, T.A.Chromatographia 1993,37, 645.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Berger, T.A.Chromatographia 1996,42, 63–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shen, Y.; Lee, M.L.Chromatographia 1997,45, 67–77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu, N.; Yee, R.; Lee, M.L.Chromatographia 2001,53, 197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Berger, T.A.; Toney, C.J. Chromatogr. 1989,465, 157–167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Berger, T.A. U.S. Patent 4,982,597, Jan 8,1991.

  15. Guthrie, E.J.; Schwartz, H.E.J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1986,24, 236–241.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Berger, T.A.; Todd, B.S.Chromatographia 2001,54, 771–775.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nozawa, A.; Ohnuma, T.J. Chromatogr. 1980,187, 261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Okada, T.J. Chromatogr. 1992,609, 213.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Meissner, Ch.; Engelhardt, H.Chromatographia 1999,49, 7–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Berger, T.A.; Todd, B.S.Chromatographia 2001,54, 777–781.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lou, X.W.; Janssen, H.-G.; Cramers, C.A. Proceedings 20th International Symposium on Capillary Chromatography, Riva del Garda, Italy,1998.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berger, T.A. Simple correction for variable post column split ratios using pure carbon dioxide in packed column supercritical fluid chromatography with independent pressure and flow control. Chromatographia 54, 783–788 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02492499

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02492499

Key Words

Navigation