Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation of unbonded silica stationary phases for the separation of basic analytes using capillary electrochromatography

  • Originals
  • Electrophoresis
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In this work, the use of three Hypersil unbonded silica phases of different purity, with simple aqueous-organic mobile phase eluents has achieved excellent separations of a basic analyte mixture. LC determination of the ion-exchange capacity of the three silicas highlighted a significant difference in their acidic silanol activity i.e. Hypersil silica >Hypersil BDS silica >Hypurity silica. The total silanol activity for the three phases was very similar. Isocratic CEC analysis on the acidic Hypersil unbonded silica using RP-CEC mobile phase conditions (pH 7.8) generated excellent peak shape, good efficiencies (148–508,000 plates/metre) and baseline separation within 14 min for a mixture of six pharmaceutically relevant basic analytes. The less acidic unbonded silicas gave better peak shapes with reduced analysis times than the Hypersil silica, however baseline separation of the basic analytes was not achieved. It was postulated that the separation mechanism with unbonded silica is a balance between the analyte's electromobility and its interaction (i. e. ion-exchange and reversed-phase/adsorption mechanisms) with the silica surface. The magnitude of the interaction is dependent upon the proportion and distribution of acidic silanol groups present on the surface and the pH of the mobile phase.

The silica materials exhibited a small, but significant, reversed-phase character thus enabling acid, base and neutral components to be separated within a single run.

Excellent CEC retention predictions were achieved by taking into consideration the analyte's electromobility in CE, its retention factor in LC and the EOF in CEC under identical experimental conditions.

The technique has been shown to be truly orthogonal in nature to CE and LC and hence is a highly complementary and important technique for the analytical chemist.

The use of unbonded silica in CEC, with reversed-phase mobile phase conditions, provides an excellent separation technique for the rapid analysis of basic analytes of wide structural diversity (i. e. differing pK as and log P values).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pretorius, V.; Hopkins, B.J.; Schieke, J.D.J. Chromatogr. 1974,99, 23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Altria, K.D.J. Chromatogr. A 1999,856, 443.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cikalo, M.G.; Bartle, K.D.; Robson, M.M.; Myers, P.; Euerby, M.R.Analyst 1998,123, 87R.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Colón, L.A.; Reynolds, K.J.; Alicea-Maldonado, R.; Fermier, A.M.Electrophoresis 1997,18, 2162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Robson, M.M.; Cikalo, M.G.; Myers, P.; Euerby, M.R.; Bartle, K.D.J. Microcol. Sep. 1997,9, 357.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, N.W.; Evans, M.B.Chromatographia 1995,41, 197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillott, N.G.; Euerby, M.R.; Johnson, C.M.; Barrett, D.A.; Shaw, P.N.Anal. Comm. 1998,35, 217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nahum, A.; Horváth, C.J. Chromatogr. 1981,203, 53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nawrocki, J.J. Chromatogr. A 1997,779, 29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cecchi, T.; Pucciarelli, F.; Passamonti, P.; Ferraro, S.J. Liq. Chrom. & Rel. Technol. 1999,22, 429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cox, G.B.J. Chromatogr. A 1993,656, 353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Euerby, M.R. presented at the Royal Society of Chemistry Meeting, Hertford, UK,1997.

  13. Lurie, I.S.; Conver, T.S.; Ford, V.L.Anal. Chem. 1998,70, 4563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, N.W.Chromatography and Separation Techniques,1999,8, 10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Euerby, M.R.; Johnson, C.M.; Bartle, K.D.; Cikalo, M.G.; Myers, P.; Roulin, S.C.P. presented at the 19th International Symposium on Capillary Chromatography and Electrophoresis, Wintergreen, USA,1997.

  16. Angus, P.D.; Stobaugh, J.F.; Demarest, C.W.; Payne, K.M.; Sedo, K.R.; Kwoh, L.Y.; Catalano, T. presented at the 19th International Symposium on Capillary Chromatography and Electrophoresis, Wintergreen, USA,1997.

  17. Rozing, G.P.; Dittmann, M.M.; Kirkland, J.J. presented at the 20th International Symposium on Capillary Chromatography, Riva del Garda, Italy,1998.

  18. Jane, I.J. Chromatogr. 1975,111, 227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bidlingmeyer, B.A.; Del Rios, J.K.; Korpl, J.Anal. Chem. 1982,54, 442.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cox, G.B.; Stout, R.W.J. Chromatogr. 1987,384, 315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Golkiewicz, W.; Kuczyński, J.; Markowski, W.; Jusiak, L.J. Chromatogr. A 1994,686, 85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Naidong, W.; Lee, W.; Jiang, X.; Wehling, M.; Hulse, J.D.; Lin, P.P.J. Chromatogr. B 1999,735, 255.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wei, W.; Luo, G.A.; Hua, G.Y.; Yan, C.J. Chromatogr. A 1998,817, 65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gillott, N.G.; Euerby, M.R.; Johnson, C.M.; Barrett, D.A.; Shaw, P.N.Chromatographia 2000,51, 167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferguson, P.D.; Smith, N.W.; Moffatt, F.; Wren, S.A.C.; Evans, K.P.Poster presentation HPLC 99, Granada, Spain,1999.

  26. Ye, M.; Zou, H.; Liu, Z.; Ni, J.; Zhang, Y.J. Chromatogr. A 1999,855, 137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wei, W.; Luo, G.A.; Xiang, R.J. Microcol. Sep. 1999,11, 263.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cruz, E.; Euerby, M.R.; Johnson, C.M.; Hackett, C.A.Chromatographia 1997,44, 151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Euerby, M.R.; Gillott, N.G. unpublished results,AstraZeneca R&D Charnwood,1999.

  30. Altria, K.D.; Smith, N.W.; Turnbull, C.H.Chromatographia 1997,46, 64.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Euerby, M.R.; Gilligan, D.; Johnson, C.M.; Roulin, S.C.P.; Myers, P.; Bartle, K.D.J. Microcol. Sep. 1997,9, 373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Berthod, A.J. Chromatog. 1991,549, 1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. McCalley, D.V.; Brereton, R.G.J. Chromatogr. A 1997,828, 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sudo, Y.; Wada, T.J. Chromatogr. A 1998,813, 239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. McCalley, D.V.LC-GC Europe 1999,12, 638.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gillot, N.G.PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham Science Library,2000.

  37. Bij, K.E.; Horváth, C.; Melander, W.R.; Nahum, A.J. Chromatogr. 1981,203, 65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Unger, K.K. inPorous Silica its properties and use as support in column liquid chromatography, Elsevier, Amsterdam,1979.

    Google Scholar 

  39. McKeown, A.P.; Euerby, M.R. unpublished results,AstraZeneca R&D Charnwood 2000.

  40. Vissers, J.P.C.; Classens, H.A.; Coufal, P.J High. Resol. Chromatogr. 1995,18, 540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKeown, A.P., Euerby, M.R., Johnson, C.M. et al. An evaluation of unbonded silica stationary phases for the separation of basic analytes using capillary electrochromatography. Chromatographia 52, 777–786 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02491004

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02491004

Key words

Navigation