Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of Silica C and Silica Gel in HILIC Mode: The Effect of Stationary Phase Surface Area

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to assess the effect of silica gel structure on retention in hydrophilic interaction chromatography, a test system was developed which used quaternary ammonium ions as probes with tetramethylammonium acetate (TMAA) as the counter-ion competing against the interaction of the test probes with ionised silanols in the stationary phase. Four silica gel columns and a silica hydride column were examined. Retention times were obtained for the test probes at 20, 40, 60, 80 and 90 % acetonitrile (ACN) with all the mobile phase mixtures containing 10-mM TMAA buffer at pH 6.0. All phases gave “U”-shaped plots for log k against percentage of ACN with the steepest rise in retention occurring between 80 and 90 % ACN. Benzyltrimethylammonium, the smallest quaternary ammonium ion, was the most strongly retained probe at 90 % ACN and was most retained on a high surface area 60 Å Kromasil column and least retained on a 300 Å ACE silica gel column. The ionic strength of the mobile phase was varied at 80 and 90 % ACN and plots of log k against the inverse of buffer strength followed by fitting of second-order polynomial curves allowed an assessment of the contribution from HILIC to the mixed HILIC/ion-exchange retention mechanism. Toluene and pentylbenzene were used to assess the decrease in accessible pore volume due to water absorption in HILIC mode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alpert AJ (1990) J Chromatogr A 499:177–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Naidong W (2003) J Chromatogr B 796:209–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hemström P, Irgum K (2006) J Sep Sci 29:1784–1821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buszewski B, Noga S (2012) Anal Bioanal Chem 402:31–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang T, Watson DG (2013) Curr Metabol 1:58–83

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nawrocki J (1997) J Chromatogr A 779:29–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Tannak NF, Bawazeer S, Siddiqui T, Watson DG (2011) J Chromatogr A 1218:486–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McCalley DV, Neu UD (2008) J Chromatogr A 1192:225–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gritti F, dos Santos PA, Sandra P, Guiochon G (2009) J Chromatogr A 1216:8496–8504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kazakevich Y, Lo Brutto R (2007) HPLC for pharmaceutical scientists. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Melnikov SM, Höltzel A, Seidel-Morgenstern A, Tallarek U (2013) J Phys Chem C 117:6620–6631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pesek JJ, Matyska MT, Boysen RI, Yang Y, Hearn MTW (2013) Trend Anal Chem 42:64–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pesek JJ, Matyska JMT (2009) J Sep Sci 32:999–4011

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bawazeer S, Sutcliffe OB, Euerby MR, Bawazeer S, Watson DG (2012) J Chromatogr A 1263:61–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chu CH, Jonsson E, Auvinen M, Pesek JJ, Sandoval JE (1993) Anal Chem 65:808–816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Roses M (1993) Anal Chim Acta 276:211–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Valkó K, Snyder LR, Glajch JL (1993) J Chromatogr A 656:501–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McCalley DV (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:3408–3417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bicker W, Wu J, Yeman H, Albert K, Lindner W (2011) J Chromatogr A 1218:882–895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bocian S, Rychlicki G, Matyska M, Pesek J, Buszeski B (2014) J Coll Interf Sci 416:161–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Saudi Arabian government for a scholarship for Eman Santali.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David G. Watson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santali, E.Y., Edwards, D., Sutcliffe, O.B. et al. A Comparison of Silica C and Silica Gel in HILIC Mode: The Effect of Stationary Phase Surface Area. Chromatographia 77, 873–881 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-014-2694-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-014-2694-9

Keywords

Navigation