Abstract
Differential diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular carcinoma is clinically important because, while both are hypervascular tumors, they have vastly different prognoses. Because the spoke-wheel appearance is the primary characteristic of focal nodular hyperplasia, we attempted to detect this pattern in nodules smaller than 3 cm in diameter with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using a contrast agent (Levovist). Four patients were examined with contrast-enhanced US: two of the patients were examined with Coded Harmonic Angio; the other two patients were examined with contrast-enhanced color and power Doppler US without harmonic imaging. Although the hepatic arteriogram showed the spoke-wheel appearance in only one tumor (diameter, 3 cm), contrast-enhanced US clearly demonstrated this characteristic in all four tumors, including three tumors that were less than 2 cm in diameter. Because it is noninvasive and can be carried out in an outpatient clinic, contrast-enhanced US is extremely useful for diagnosing small focal noduler hyperplasia lesions at sites that can be observed with US.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Knowles DM II, Wolff M: Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: a clinicopathologic study and review of the literature.Hum Pathol 1976;7: 533–545.
Kehagias D, Moulopoulos L, Antoniou A, et al: Focal nodular hyperplasia: imaging findings.Eur Radiol 2001;11: 202–212.
Fechner RE, Roehm JOF Jr: Angiographic and pathologic correlations of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia.Am J Surg Pathol 1977;1: 217–224.
Kudo M: Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Imaging of Hepatic Tumors. Tokyo, Igaku-Shoin, 2001; pp. 20–21.
Ding H, Kudo M, Onda H, et al: Evaluation of posttreatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma with contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic US: comparison with dynamic CT.Radiology 2001;221: 721–730.
Wanless IR, Mawdsley C, Adams R: On the pathogenesis of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver.Hepatology 1985;5: 1194–1200.
Rogers JV, Mack LA, Freeny PC, et al: Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: angiography, CT, sonography, and scintigraphy.AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981;137: 983–990.
Mathieu D, Bruneton JN, Drouillard J, et al: Hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: dynamic CT study.Radiology 1986;160: 53–58.
Lencioni R, Pinto F, Armillotta N, et al: Assessment of tumor vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of power Doppler US and color Doppler US.Radiology 1996;201: 353–358.
Tanaka S, Kitamura T, Fujita M, et al: Value of contrast-enhanced color Doppler sonography in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma with special attention to “color-filled pattern”.J Clin Ultrasound 1998;26: 207–212.
Kim AY, Choi BI, Kim TK, et al: Hepatocellular carcinoma: power Doppler US with a contrast agent-preliminary results.Radiology 1998;209: 135–140.
Uggowitzer M, Kugler C, Groll R, et al: Sonographic evaluation of focal nodular hyperplasias (FNH) of the liver with a transpulmonary galactose-based contrast agent (Levivist).Br J Radiol 1998;71: 1026–1032.
Kudo M: Contrast harmonic ultrasound is a breakthrough technology in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Med Ultrasonics 2001;28: 79–81.
Jibiki T: Updated technology in ultrasound blood flow imaging. Neurosonology 2001;14: 113–114.
Takayasu K, Muramatsu Y, Moriyama N, et al: Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: arterial angio-CT and microangiography.J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16: 212–215.
Miyayama S, Matsui O, Ueda K, et al: Hemodynamics of small hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: evaluation with single-level dynamic CT during hepatic arteriography.AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174: 1567–1569.
Kudo M, Tomita S, Tochio H, et al: Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: specific findings at dynamic contrast-enhanced US with carbon dioxide microbubbles.Radiology 1991;179: 377–382.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Miura, Y., Kondo, K., Oikawa, J. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using levovist: Usefulness of diagnosis of small focal nodular hyperplasia lesions. J Med Ultrasonics 29, 99–104 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481231
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481231