Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mapping the ecological structure of a territory: a case study in madrid (central spain)

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A procedure to map the ecological structure of a territory is shown. The ecological structure is considered to be the result of the spatial coincidence of numerous physical and biological variables and the spatial connections between territorial sectors. The spatial correspondence patterns of such variables and sectors are detected by multivariate ordination analyses and were mapped using trend surface analysis (TSA). According to these premises an ecological map of the Madrid area was designed. This ecological map is objective: its characteristics do not depend on decisions by the specialists who compile it. The information it contains is based on the systematic analysis of the spatial relationships between numerous variables and territorial sectors. The use of TSA allows a synthesis of the way in which general gradients easily show the ecological spatial variability of the territory (low degree polynomials) or a superimposed—cellular or equipotential—structure appears on those gradients (high degree polynomials). The usefulness of the map is that it shows the ecological structure of the territory and the spatial linkages between the elements of this structure. The accuracy of the map showing these relationships may be ascertained by the fit to trend surfaces of increasing degree. The test was considered to be satisfactory as the results agreed with the prior ecological descriptions of the area. The procedure is thus deemed applicable to lesser known areas and can be very useful in planning studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Allaire, G. M., M. Phipps, and F. Stoupy. 1973. Analyse écologique des structures d'ocupation du sol.L'Éspace Géographique, 3:185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammer, V. (coord.). 1979. Ecological mapping of the community: Report and recommendations for a method. Munich University, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, L. S. 1930. Landshafto-geograficheskiezony SSSR. Vviedieniie. Iz-vo LGU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernáldez, F. G. (coord.). 1973. Cartografía temática ecológica de la subregión de Madrid. Informe para MOPU. Anthos, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernáldez, F. G. 1981. Ecología y Paisaje. H. Blume, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernáldez, F. G., P. Herera, C. Levassor, B. Peco, and A. Sastre. 1987. Las aguas subterráneas en el paisaje. Investigación y Ciencia (Scientific American) 127:8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolós, M. (dir.). 1992. Manual de Ciencia del Paisaje. Teoría, métodos y aplicaciones. Masson, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brossard, T., and J. C. Wieber. 1979. Structure des paysages et géographic zonal.Cahiers de Géographie de Besancon 27:93–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, R. G. H., S. K. Morrel, and H. E. Steel. 1975. The application of multivariate analysis to regional survey.Journal of Environmental Management 3:151–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, R. G. H., C. J. Barr, and A. Whittaker. 1982. An integrated system of land classification. I.T.E. Merlewood Research Station, Cumbria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, J. F., J. A. Palazón, M. A. Esteve, M. L. Suárez, A. Torres, M. R. Vidal-Abarca, and L. Ramirez Díaz. 1992. The use of multivariate analysis for the ecological characterization of landscape: The Mula river watershed. Southeast Spain.Journal of Environmental Management 34:297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartan, M. 1975. Analyse quantitative d'indicateurs cartographiques: essai critique sur les relations vegetation-milieu en Sologne. C.N.R.S., Montpellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • COPLACO. 1975. Plan especial de protección del medio físico de Madrid. Ministerio de la Vivienda, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chikishev, A. G. 1973. Landscape indicators. Constultants Bureau, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, C. S. and G. A. Stewart. 1968. Methodology of integrated surveys.In UNESCO: Aerial surveys and integrated studies.UNESCO Natural Resources Research VI:233–280.

  • Demangeot, J. 1989. Los medios “naturales” del globo. Masson, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pablo, C. L., and F. D. Pineda. 1985. Análisis del territorio para su cartografía ecológica. Ensayo preliminar en la provincia de Madrid.Anales de Geografía de la Universidad Complutense 5:235–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pablo, C. L., A. Gomez Sal, and F. D. Pineda. 1987. Elaboration automatique d'une cartographie écologique et son évaluation avec des paramètres de la théorie de l'information.L'Espace Géographique 2:115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pablo, C. L., P. Martín de Agar, A. Gomez Sal, and F. D. Pineda. 1988. Descriptive capacity and indicative value of territorial variables in ecological cartography.Landscape Ecology 1(4):203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T. 1989. The Beginnings of Landscape Ecology in America.In I. S. Zonneveld, and R. T. T. Forman (eds.), Changing landscapes: An ecological perspective. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T. and M. Godron 1986. Landscape ecology. Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frondorf, A. F., M. M. McCarthy, and W. O. Rasmussen. 1978. Data-intensive spatial sampling and multiple hierarchical clustering: methodological approaches toward cost/time efficiency in natural resources assessment.Landscape Planning 5:1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín, G. 1982. Una metodologí a para la regionalización ambiental. I. Bases metodológicas.Ecología Argentina 7:161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosz, J. R., and P. J. H. Sharpe. 1989. Broad-scale concepts for interactions of climate, topography and biota at biome transitions. Landscape Ecology 3(2–4):229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gittins, R. 1968. Trend surface analysis of ecological data.Journal of Ecology 56:845–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicar, A., C. L. De Pablo, P. Martín de Agar, and F. D. Pineda. 1988. Indicadores vegetales en cartografía ecológica I: Tendencias de variación a lo largo de un gradiente.Studia Oecologica V:171–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicar, A., C. L. De Pablo, P. Martín de Agar, and F. D. Pineda. 1989. Indicadores vegetales en cartografía ecológica II: Interés cartográfico de la variabilidad cenológica.Studia Oecológica VI:143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O. 1979. DECORANA, a FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal alteraging. Ecology and Systematics. Cornell University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O., and H. G. Gauch, Jr. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: An improved ordination technique.Vegetatio 42:42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E. 1957a. Concluding Remarks.Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 22:415–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E. 1957b. The ecological theater and the evolutionary play. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P., and M. J. Fortin. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis.Vegetatio 80:107–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llorca, A., and M. Ruíz 1986. Factores físicos que rigen la estructura de usos de un territorio: el caso de Madrid.Ciudad y Territorio 67:65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHarg, I. 1969. Design with nature. Doubleday Natural History Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalef, R. 1968. Perspectives in ecological theory. University Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalef, R. 1974. Ecología. Omega, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, P. M. 1979. Computational methods of multivariate analysis in physical geography. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskalenko, N. G. 1973. Microphytocenoses of some landscapes of northern Siberia and their indicator significance.In A. G. Chikishev (ed.), Landscape indicators. Consultants Bureau, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh, Z. 1982. Landscape ecology as an emerging branch of human ecosystem science.Advances in Ecological Research 12:189–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroli, G. B. M. 1984. Data ordination in ecological land survey. IGU-Congress, Paris.

  • Pineda, F. D., and F. G. Bernáldez. 1975. Experiencia obtenida con modelos de regresión múltiple para la descripción del habitat de matorrales.Anales del Instituto Botánico J. Cavanilles XXXII(II):1333–1349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pineda, F. D., and B. Peco. 1988. Pastizales adehesados del Monte de El Pardo.Mundo Científico (La Recherche), 79(8):387–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polynov, F. 1956. Izbr. trudy. Iz-vo AN. SSSR. Moskva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, A. (coord.). 1985. Mapa de las formaciones vegetales y usos actuales del suelo de Madrid. Comunidad de Madrid, Consejería de Agricultura y Ganadería, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivas-Martinez, S. 1982. Mapa de las series de vegetación de Madrid. Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, K. F. 1989. The history of landscape ecology in Europe.In I. S. Zonneveld, and R. T. T. Forman (eds.), Changing landscapes: An ecological perspective. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevchenko, L. A. 1973. The possible use of landscape indicators for evaluating transportation through swamps.In A. G. Chikishev (ed.), Landscape indicators. Consultants Bureau, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobolev, L. M. 1979. Methods for ecological-typological investigation of lands. Ilim, Frunze.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sochava, V. B. 1963. Opriedielieniie niekotorykh ponyatii i terminov fizicheskoi gheografii. Doklady In-ta gheografii Sibiri i Dal'niego Vostoka. Vyp. 3.

  • Solntsiev, V. N. 1974. O niekotoryk fundamentalnykh svoistakh gheosistemnoi struktury. Methody kompleksnykh issledovaniii gheosistem. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Irkust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoking, M., and N. Abel. 1981. Ecological and environmental indicators for the rapid appraisal of natural resources.Agricultural Administration 8:473–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troll, K. 1971. Landscape ecology (geo-ecology) and biocenology. A terminology study,Geoforum 8:43–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., V. H. Dale, and R. H. Gardner. 1989. Predicting across scales: Theory development and testing.Landscape Ecology 3:245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. J., R. V. O'Neill, W. Conley, M. R. Conley, and H. C. Humphries, 1991. Pattern and scale: Statistics for landscape ecology.In M. G. Turner, and R. H. Gardner (eds.), Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unwin, D. 1981. Introductory spatial analysis. Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D. L., V. O'Neill and H. H. Shugart, Jr. 1987. Landscape ecology,BioScience 37(2):119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartemberg, D. 1985. Multivariate spatial correlation: A method for exploratory geographical analysis.Geographical Analysis 17:262–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. 1975. Communities and ecosystems. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. 1978. Ordination of Plant Communities. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A., and B. T. Milne, 1989. Scaling of ‘landscapes’ in landscape ecology, or landscape ecology from a bettle's perspective.Landscape Ecology 3(2):87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld, I. Z. 1983. Principles of bioindication.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 3:207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld, I. Z. 1989. The land unit: A fundamental concept in landscape ecology and its applications.Landscape Ecology 3(2):67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento Interuniversitario de Ecología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, E-28040, Madrid, Spain

    Pilar Martin de Agar, Carlos L. de Pablo & Francisco D. Pineda

Authors
  1. Pilar Martin de Agar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlos L. de Pablo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francisco D. Pineda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin de Agar, P., de Pablo, C.L. & Pineda, F.D. Mapping the ecological structure of a territory: a case study in madrid (central spain). Environmental Management 19, 345–357 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471977

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471977

Key Words

Search

Navigation