Abstract
A prospective and randomized clinical study was conducted in order to compare cefoxitin (CFX) and ceftizoxime (CZX) as prophylactic antibiotics. Two hundred and three consecutive cases of elective upper gastrointestinal tract surgery, performed at our institute between January, 1983, and March, 1986, were entered in the trial. The patients were assigned randomly, before surgery, to the CFX or to the CZX group. Two grams of the assigned antibiotic was first administered during surgery and then continued at a dose of 1 gram, every 8 hrs for a total of 4 days. One patient was withdrawn from the study due to an allergic reaction. Both groups were comparable in sex, age, underlying disease, diagnosis, operation, and preoperative laboratory data. There were 18 infections related to the operation in the CFX group, while there were only 3 in the CZX group (p<0.001). The number of unrelated infections in each group was 6 and 6 respectively (NS). No special differences were found between the two groups regarding the kinds of microorganisms isolated, and no significant differences were seen in the adverse effects of either antibiotic. Our study demonstrated that ceftizoxime was more efficient than cefoxitin in preventing postoperative infection, following upper gastrointestinal tract surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cruse PJE, Foord R. A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds. Arch Surg 1973; 107: 206–210.
Malangany MA, Condon RE, Spiegel CA. Treatment of intraabdominal infections is appropriate with single-agent or combination antibiotic therapy, Surgery 1985; 98: 648–655.
Nichols RL, Smith JW, Trunkey DD, Cooper RH, Mills J, Adinolfi MF. Risk of infection after penetrating abdominal trauma. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 1065–1070.
Kager L, Ljungdahl I, Malmborg AS, Nord CE, Pieper R, Dahlgren P. Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefoxitin in colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 1981; 193: 277–282.
Tally FP, McGowan K, Kellum JM, Gorbach SL, O’Donnell TF. A randomized comparison of cefoxitin with or without amikacin and clindamycin plus amikacin in surgical sepsis. Ann Surg 1981; 193: 318–323.
Burke JF. The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery 1961; 50: 161–168.
Scher KS, Wroczynski AF, Jones CW. Duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. Am J Surg 1986; 151: 209–212.
Conte JE Jr, Cohen SN, Benson BR, Elashoff RM. Antibiotic prophylaxis and cardiac surgery. A prospective double-blind comparison of single-doseversus multiple-dose regimens. Ann Intern Med 1972; 76: 943–949.
Shinagawa N, Fukui T, Ogino K, Mashita K, Mizuno A, Takaoka T, Ishikawa S, Mizuno I, Yura J. Clinical evaluation of prophylactic antibiotics in the field of abdominal surgery. Nippon Shokaki Geka Gakkai Zassi (Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg) 1988; 21: 101–106. (in Japanese)
Maki DG, Aughey DR. Comparative study of cefazolin, cefoxitin, and ceftizoxime for surgical prophylaxis in colorectal surgery. J Antimicrob Chemother 1982; 10 (Suppl. C): 281–287.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fukui, T., Shinagawa, N., Takaoka, T. et al. Postoperative infection prophylaxis for upper gastrointestinal tract surgery—A prospective and comparative randomized study of cefoxitin and ceftizozime. The Japanese Journal of Surgery 19, 255–261 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471399
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471399