Skip to main content
Log in

Chromatographic classification of commercially available reverse-phase HPLC columns

  • Originals
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The ever-increasing number of commercially available reversed phases with which the analyst is confronted can cause problems in column selection. These and the non-standard test procedures used by the column manufacturers and packing companies cause further confusion. In order to independently compare and contrast a range of well established C18 stationary phases, we have performed a modified column characterization approach, based on Tanaka's methodology, on thirty commonly used phases in our laboratory. These results have been evaluated and presented in various formats as Principal Component Analysis, Cluster Analysis, Tabular Format and Radar Plots in order to assist in observing similarities and differences between phases.

The results indicate that, while no two phases are exactly the same (with the exception of “me-to” clones), it is possible to characterize phases into different classes based on their chromatographic performance against selected test probes. The paper illustrates the similarities and differences between these phases.

The column characterization described in the paper can form the basis of a rational column selection protocol by either careful matching of the appropriate column characteristics to the analyte's physico-chemical properties or by a systematic evaluation of columns from our various categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Berthod, J. Chromatogr.549, 1 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Walczak, J. Morin-Allory, M. Lafosse, M. Dreux, J. R. Chrétien, J. Chromatogr.395, 183 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Delaney, A. N. Papas, M. J. Walters, J. Chromatogr.410, 31 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Welsch, H. Frank, H. Zwanziger, S. Liebisch, W. Engewald, Chromatographia19, 457 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Chatsfield, A. J. Collins, Introduction to Multivariate Annlysis (1980) 246, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. B. Cox, J. Chromatogr.656, 353 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. O. Akapo, C. F. Simpson, J. Chromatogr. Sci.28, 186 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. H. O. Fatunmbi, M. D. Bruch, M. J. Wirth, Anal. Chem.65, 2048 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. P. J. Van Dan Driest, H. J. Ritchie, S. Rose, LC · GC6, 124 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. L. Miller, R. W. Linton, S. G. Bush, J. W. Jorgenson, Anal. Chem.56, 2204 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. L. Miller, R. W. Linton, S. G. Bush, J. W. Jorgenson, J. Chromatogr. A213, 1 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Holík, B. Matjková, J. Chromatogr.213, 33 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Engelhardt, H. Löw, W. Götzinger, J. Chromatogr.544, 37 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Engelhardt, H. Müller, J. Chromatogr.218 395 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. I. M. Mutton, J. Chromatogr. A697, 191 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Engelhardt, M. Jungheim, Chromatographia29, 59 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. J. Walters, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem.70, 465 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. H. A. Claessens, E. A. Vermeer, C. A. Cramers, LC · GC12, 114 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. K. Kimata, K. Iwaguchi, S. Onishi, K. Jinno, R. Eksteen, K. Hosoya, M. Araki, N. Tanaka, J. Chromatogr. Sci.27, 721 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. R. Euerby, C. M. Johnson, I. D. Rushin, D. A. S. S. Tennekoon, J. Chromatogr. A705, 219 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. M. R. Euerby, C. M. Johnson, I. D. Rushin, D. A. S. S. Tennekoon, J. Chromatogr. A705, 229 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. M. R. Euerby, C. M. Johnson, D. A. S. S. Tennekoon, presented at 20th International Symposium on Chromatography, Bournemouth (UK) 19–24th June 1994.

  23. B. Pfleiderer, E. Bayer, J. Chromatogr.468, 67 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R. Vespalec, J. Neca, J. Chromatogr.281, 35 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. L. C. Sander, S. A. Wise, J. Chromatogr. A656, 335 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. M. A. Stadalius, J. S. Berus, L. R. Snyder, LC. GC6, 494 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. J. W. Dolan, LC. GC7, 476 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. J. W. Dolan, Liq. Chromatogr. HPLC Mag.4, 222 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. Nawrocki, Chromatographia31, 193 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. D. V. McCalley, J. Chromatogr.636, 213 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. G. B. Cox, R. W. Stout, J. Chromatogr.384, 315 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. J. J. Kirkland, J. W. Henderson, J. Chromatogr. Sci.32, 473 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. A. Nahum, Cs. Horváth, J Chromatogr.203, 53 (1981)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cruz, E., Euerby, M.R., Johnson, C.M. et al. Chromatographic classification of commercially available reverse-phase HPLC columns. Chromatographia 44, 151–161 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02466449

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02466449

Key Words

Navigation