Abstract
This autobiographical article describes action research, utilising a hermeneutic dialectic methodology, on the efficacy of problem-based learning. In the emergent research design, the research focus for the teacher evolved as: “Can I, as an instructor, teach science in such a way that: the use of science in real life is emphasised; an interdisciplinary approach is utilised; assessment is an integral part of instruction; and learning is student-driven, not teacher directed?” To answer this research question, the article focuses on the emergence of students' critical thinking skills, the relevance of science concepts taught, the interdisciplinary nature of the problems addressed, the use of alternative methods of assessment, and the changing roles of the teacher and the students. One significant finding reported in the article is the development of student autonomy, as the problem-based learning format allowed students freedom to pursure diverse research agendas and to accept increasing responsibility for their own learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boud, D. (Ed.), (1985).Problem-based learning in education for the professions. Kensington, Australia: Higher Education Research an Development Society of Australia.
Bridges, E. M., & Hallinger, P. (1991).Problem-based learning in medical and managerial education. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, School of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 343 265)
Davis, N. T., McCarty, B. J., Shaw, K. L., & Sidani-Tabbaa, A. (1993). Transitions from objectivism to constructivism in science education.International Journal of Science Education, 15, 627–636.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Gallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J., & Rosenthal, H. (1992). The effects of problem-based learning on problem solving.Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 195–200.
Grundy, S. (1987).Curriculum: Product or praxis. London: The Falmer Press.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989).Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970).The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lorsbach, A. W., Tobin, K., Briscoe, C., & LaMaster, S. U. (1992). An interpretation of assessment methods in middle school science.International Journal of Science Education, 14(3), 305–317.
Ma, J. (1994). Problem-based learning with database systems.Computers and Education, 22, 257–263.
Middleton, H. (1994).Problem-based learning in workshops. Adelaide, Australia: Griffith University, National Centre for Vocational Education Research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 380 542)
Rieber, L. P. (1993). A pragmatic view of instructional technology. In K. Tobin (Ed.),The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 193–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Roth, W-M. (1993). Construction sites: Science labs and classrooms. In K. Tobin (Ed.),The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 145–170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Tippins, D. J., Tobin, K. G., & Hook, K. (1993). Ethical decisions at the heart of teaching: Making sense from a constructivist perspective.Journal of Moral Education, 22(3), 221–240.
Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning.School Science and Mathematics, 90(5), 403–418.
Tobin, K. (1993a). Referents for making sense of science teaching.International Journal of Science Education, 15, 241–254.
Tobin, K. (Ed.) (1993b).The practice of constructivism in science education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Tobin, K., Briscoe, C., & Holman, J. (1990). Overcoming constraints to effective elementary science teaching.Science Education, 74(4), 409–420.
Van Tassel-Baska, J., Bailey, J., Gallagher, S., & Fettig, M. (1992).A conceptual overview of science education for high ability learners. Williamsburg, VA: The College of William and Mary, School of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 354 709)
Yager, R. E., & Lutz, M. V. (1994). Integrated science: The importance of “how” versus “what”.School Science and Mathematics, 94(7), 338–346.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Butler, S. Catalysing student autonomy through action research in a problem centred learning environment. Research in Science Education 29, 127–140 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461184
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461184