Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 195–205 | Cite as

Nanotechnology-interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application

  • M. Meyer
  • O. Persson
Article

Abstract

Nanotechnology is a novel technological field said to be one of the key technologies in the 21st century revoltionizing information technology, materials and medicine. Bibliometric quantification is a way to show the emergence of a new technology.Braun et al.1 could establish an exponential growth pattern of publications in nano-science and technology starting in the early 1990s. Using their study as basis we intend to further characterize nanotechnology using bibliometric as well as patent data. We can show that the share of boundary-spanning publications is exceptionally high in the field of nanotechnology. Our co-authorship analysis indicates that countries follow different patterns of collaboration. Some countries tend to have bilateral relations while others collaborate with a much larger array of nations. Patent data in combination with bibliometric reveals differences in the application of science. In our conclusion we raise a number of questions requiring an analysis using also other types of data. Still, a closer investigation and disaggregation of bibliometric data may come up with additional findings.

Keywords

Technological Field Patent Activity Patent Data Major Field Bilateral Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes references

  1. 1.
    T. Braun, A. Schubert, S. Zsindely, Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance,Scientometrics, 38 (1997) 321–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Malsch,Nanotechnology in Europe: Experts' Perceptions and Scientific Relations between Subareas. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Franks, Nanotechnology,Journal of Physics E-Scientific Instrumentation, 20 (1987) 1442–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. W. Budworth,Overview of Activities on Nanotechnology and Related Technology, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    G. Bachmann,Nanotechnology. Technology analysis prepared within the framework of the “Identification and Assessment of Approaches to Future Technologies’ plan (no. NT 2051B) under contract to the Federal Ministry for Research and Technology. VDI [Verein Deutscher Ingenieure], Düsseldorf, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    BMBF,Delphi-Bericht 1995 zur Entwicklung von Wissenschaft und Technik-Mini-Delphi, Bonn, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    BMFT,Deutscher Delphi-Bericht zur Entwicklung von Wissenschaft und Technik, Bonn, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    O. Kuusi,Materiaalit Muroksessa, VATT, Helsinki, 1994.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    M. Nelson, C. Shipbaugh,The Potential of Nanotechnology for Molecular Manufacturing, Santa Monica, RAND Organization, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    M. S. Meyer,Nanotechnology and its Industrial Applications, Wuppertal, W. WIS, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    D. Hicks, S. Katz, Where is science going?Science, Technology, and Human Values, 21 (1996) 4, 379–406.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    F. Narin, K. S. Hamilton, D. Olivastro, Linkage between agency supported research and patented industrial technology,Research Evaluation, 5 (1995) 3, 183–187.Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    F. Narin, K.S. Hamilton, D. Olivastro, The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science,Research Policy, 26 (1997) 3, 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 18.
    A. Gibbons et al.,The New Production of Knowledge, London, Sage. 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Meyer
    • 1
    • 2
  • O. Persson
    • 3
  1. 1.Tema TLinköping UniversityLinköping(Sweden)
  2. 2.VTT Group for Technology Studies(Finland)
  3. 3.Inforsk Group, Department of SociologyUniversity of UmeåUmeå(Sweden)

Personalised recommendations