Skip to main content
Log in

Commercial polyclonal and monoclonal histostaining PAP kits

Immunoperoxidase reagents and performance characteristics in comparison with self-prepared immunoreagents

  • Published:
Histochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Universal, polyclonal and monoclonal immunoperoxidase staining kits from BioGenex, Dako and Ortho were employed for the localization of antigens such as gastrin, prostate specific antigen, IgA, IgG, AFP and CEA in histological sections from formaldehyde fixed and paraffin embedded human specimens. The kit components were controlled by immunohistological and serological assays and were also compared with self-prepared reagents. In connection with specific primary antibodies, universal/basic kits gave reliable localization of defined antigens. The optimal concentration of the primary antibodies had to be established by dilution experiments. In the case of polyclonal kits, typical antigen localization was obtained in selected tissue sections with all the respective kits. CEA kits also stained strongly NCA molecules present in organs such as colon, stomach and liver. BioGenex polyclonal kits gave almost stronger stainings than kits from Dako and Ortho. Irrespective of which kit from different commercial sources is used, development of peroxidase activity with AEC/H2O2 often had to be stopped far below the recommended incubation time of 40 min or overstaining with color change from reddish to muddy green occurred. The latter was attributed to insufficiently balanced kit reagents, an interpretation wich was supported by quantitative serological studies. Sensitivity of immunohistological reactivity was much enhanced by pretreatment of tissue sections with Pronase. Thus, stronger immunostainings and larger numbers of positive cells were detected than in conventionally rehydrated sections. Incubation of sections with self-prepared primary antibodies, linking antibodies and PAP complexes gave essentially the same antigen localization as with commercial kits, but antibodies isolated by our affinity chromatography led to a better staining contrast with absence of nonspecific background. The advantage of monoclonal over polyclonal kits was the background-free staining of sections. Other-wise, antigens were localized in the same cell types, although cellular reactivity was usually less intense than with polyclonal antibodies. This, however, could be overcome by Pronase treatment of the sections prior to incubation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentz MS, Cohen C, Budgeon LR, Demers LM (1984) Evaluation of commercial immunoperoxidase kits in diagnosis of prostate carcinoma. Urology 23: 75–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brock J (1984) Immunchemie. Präparation von Immunglobulinen. In: Friemel H (ed) Immunologische Arbeitsmethoden. G Fischer, Stuttgart, pp 432–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Carcinogenesis Testing Program (1978) Bioassay of 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole hydrochloride for possible carcinogenicity. Natl Cancer Inst Carcinog Tech Rep Ser 93: 1–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen C, Budgeon LR (1982) Commercial immunoperoxidase kits in the study of 13 pancreatic islet-cell tumors. Am J Clin Pathol 78: 364–366

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curran RC, Gregory J (1977) The unmasking of antigens in paraffin sections of tissue by trypsin. Experientia 33: 1400–1401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denk H, Radaszkiewicz T, Weirich E (1977) Pronase pretreatment of tissue sections enhances sensitivity of the unlabelled antibodyenzyme (PAP) technique. J Immunol Methods 15: 163–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engvall E (1980) Enzyme immunoassay ELISA and EMIT. In: Colowick SP, Kaplan NO (eds) Methods in enzymology, vol 70. Academic Press, New York London, pp 419–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster JF (1980) A list of substances which may be candidates for further scientific review and possible identification, classification, and regulation as potential occupational carcinogens. Fed Regist 45: 53672–53679

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold P, Labitan A, Wong HCG, Freedman SO, Krupey J, Shuster J (1978) Physicochemical approach to the purification of human α1-fetoprotein from the ascites fluid of a hepatoma-bearing patient. Cancer Res 38: 6–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham RC, Karnovsky MJ (1966) The early stages of absorption of injected horseradish peroxidase in the proximal tubules of mouse kidney: ultrastructural cytochemistry by a new technique. J Histochem Cytochem 14: 291–302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham RC, Lundholm U, Karnovsky MJ (1965) Cytochemical demonstration of peroxidase activity with 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole. J Histochem Cytochem 13: 150–152

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammarström S, Engvall E, Johansson BG, Svensson S, Sundblad G, Goldstein IJ (1975) Nature of the tumor-associated determinant(s) of carcinoembryonic antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72: 1528–1532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hedin A, Hammarström S, Larsson A (1982) Specificities and binding properties of eight monoclonal antibodies against carcinoembryonic antigen. Mol Immunol 19: 1641–1648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang SH, Minassian H, More DJ (1976) Application of immuno-fluorescent staining on paraffin sections improved by trypsin digestion. Lab Invest 35: 383–390

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kasurinen J, Syrjänen KJ (1984) Stainability of the peptide hormones in gastrointestinal apudomas as demonstrated by immunoperoxidase kits. Scand J Gastroenterol 19: 167–172

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann WD (1978) Localization of alpha1-fetoprotein and DNA-synthesis in liver cell populations during experimental hepatocarcinogenesis in rats. Int J Cancer 21: 368–380

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann WD (1981) Alpha-fetoprotein: cellular origin of a biological marker in rat liver under various experimental conditions. Virchows Arch (Pathol Anat) 393: 9–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann WD (1984) Immuno enzyme techniques in cytochemistry. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann WD, Peschke P (1984) Comparative study of procedures for histological detection of lectin binding by use of Griffonia simplicifolia agglutinin I and gastrointestinal mucosa of the rat. Histochemistry 81: 265–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann WD, Avrameas S, Ternynck T (1974) A comparative study for ultrastructural localization of intracellular immunoglobulins using peroxidase conjugates. J Immunol Methods 5: 33–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lannér M, Bergquist R, Carlsson J, Huldt G (1978) Purification of enzyme-labelled conjugate by affinity chromatography. In: Hoffmann-Ostenhof, Breitenbach M, Koller F, Kraft D, Scheiner O (eds) Affinity chromatography. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 237–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren J (1980) Carcinoembryonic antigen in fetal tissues and in maternal serum. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A 88: 49–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini G, Carbonara AO, Heremans JF (1965) Immunochemical quantitation of antigens by single radial immunodiffusion. Immunochemistry 2: 235–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mepham BL, Frater W, Mitchell BS (1979) The use of proteolytic enzymes to improve immunoglobulin staining by the PAP technique. Histochem J 11: 345–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishi S, Hirai H (1972) Purification of human, dog and rabbit α-fetoprotein by immunoadsorbents of Sepharose coupled with antihuman α-fetoprotein. Biochim Biophys Acta 278: 293–298

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberger LA, Hardy PH, Cuculis JJ, Meyer HG (1970) The unlabeled antibody enzyme method of immunohistochemistry. Preparation and properties of soluble antigen-antibody complex (horseradish peroxidase-antihorseradish peroxidase) and its use in identification of spirochetes. J Histochem Cytochem 18: 315–333

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CR, Kledzik G (1981) Immunohistologic techniques in surgical pathology. A spectrum of “new” special stains. Human Pathol 12: 590–596

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagener C, Yang YHJ, Crawford FG, Shively JE (1983) Monoclonal antibodies for carcinoembryonic antigen and related antigens as a model system: a systematic approach for the determination of epitope specificities of monoclonal antibodies. J Immunol 130: 2308–2315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburger EK, Russfield AB, Homburger F, Weisburger JH, Boger E, Van Dongen CG, Chu KC (1978) Testing of twenty-one environmental aromatic amines or derivatives for long-term toxicity or carcinogenicity. J Environ Pathol Toxicol 2: 325–356

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yachi A, Imai K, Fujita H, Moriya Y, Tanda M, Endo T, Tsujisaki M, Kawaharada M (1984) Immunohistochemical distribution of the antigenic determinants detected by monoclonal antibodies to carcinoembryonic antigen. J Immunol 132: 2998–3004

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuhlmann, W.D., Peschke, P. Commercial polyclonal and monoclonal histostaining PAP kits. Histochemistry 82, 411–419 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02450474

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02450474

Keywords

Navigation