Summary
A computational comparison between classical Galerkin and approximate inertial manifold (AIM) methods is performed for the case of two-dimensional natural convection in a saturated porous material. For prediction of Hopf and torus bifurcations far from convection onset, the improvements of the AIM method over the classical one are small or negligible. Two reasons are given for the lack of distinct improvement. First, the small boundary layer length scale is the source of the instabilities, so it cannot be modeled as a “slave” to the larger scales, as the AIM attempts to do. Second, estimates based on the Gevrey class regularity of solutions to the governing equations show that the classical and AIM methods may be virtually equivalent. It is argued that these two reasons are physical and mathematical reflections of one another.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Armbruster, J. Guckenheimer, and P. Holmes, Kuramoto-Sivashinsky dynamics on the center-unstable manifold,SIAM J. Appl. Math. 49(3) (1989) 676–691.
J. L. Beck, Convection in a box of porous material saturated with fluid,Phys. Fluids 15(8) (1972) 1377–1383.
J. Carr,Applications of Centre Manifold Theory (New York: Springer, 1981).
P. Constantin, C. Foias, B. Nicolaenko, and R. Temam,Integral Manifolds and Inertial Manifolds for Dissipative Partial Differential Equations (New York: Springer, 1988).
P. Constantin, C. Foias, B. Nicolaenko, and R. Temam, Spectral barriers and inertial manifolds for dissipative partial differential equations,J. Dynamics Diff. Eqs. 1 (1989) 45–73.
J. H. Curry, J. R. Herring, J. Loncaric, and S. A. Orszag, Order and disorder in two- and three-dimensional Bénard convection,J. Fluid Mech. 147 (1984) 1–38.
C. Devulder, M. Marion, and E. S. Titi, On the rate of convergence of nonlinear Galerkin methods,Math. Comp. (1993) (to appear).
E. J. Doedel, AUTO: a program for the automatic bifurcation analysis of autonomous systems,Congressus Numerantum 30 (1981) 265–284 (Proceedings of the 10th Manitoba Conference on Numerical Mathematics and Computation, University of Manitoba, Winnepeg, Canada, 1980).
A. Doelman and E. S. Titi, The exponential decay of modes in the Ginzburg-Landau equation,Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop: Asymptotic-Induced Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Critical Parameters, and Domain Decomposition, eds. M. Garbey and H. G. Kaper, Beaune, France, May 1992, Kluwer in the NATO ASI Series.
P. Fabrie, Solutions fortes et comportement asymptotique pour un modèle de convection naturelle en milieux poreaux,Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 7 (1986) 49–77.
P. Fabrie, Attracteurs pour deux modèles de convection naturelle en milieux poreaux,C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 311 I (1990) 407–410.
C. Foias, O. Manley, and R. Temam, Attractors for Bénard problems: existence and physical bounds on their fractal dimension,Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications 11(8) (1987) 939–967.
C. Foias, O. Manley, and R. Temam, Modelling of the interaction of small and large eddies in two dimensional turbulence,Math. Modelling and Numer. Anal. 22(1) (1988) 93–114.
C. Foias, M. S. Jolly, I. G. Kevrekidis, G. R. Sell, and E. S. Titi, On the computation of inertial manifolds,Phys. Lett. A 131(8) (1988) 433–436.
C. Foias, B. Nicolaenko, G. R. Sell, and R. Temam, Inertial manifolds for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation and an estimate of their lowest dimension,J. Math. Pures Appl. 67 (1988) 197–226.
C. Foias, G. R. Sell, and R. Temam, Inertial manifolds for nonlinear evolutionary equations,J. Diff. Eqs. 73 (1988) 309–353.
C. Foias, G. R. Sell, and E. S. Titi, Exponential tracking and approximation of inertial manifolds for dissipative nonlinear equations,J. Dynamics Diff. Eqs. 1 (1989) 199–244.
C. Foias and R. Temam, Gevrey class regularity for the solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations,J. Functional Anal. 87 (1989) 359–369.
C. Foias and E. S. Titi, Determining nodes, finite difference schemes and inertial manifolds,Nonlinearity 4 (1991) 135–153.
H. Frick and U. Müller, Oscillatory Hele-Shaw convection,J. Fluid Mech. 126 (1983) 521–532.
I. Goldhirsch, R. Pelz, and S. A. Orszag, Numerical simulation of thermal convection in a two-dimensional box,J. Fluid Mech. 199 (1989) 1–28.
M. D. Graham and P. H. Steen, Strongly interacting traveling waves and quasiperiodic dynamics in porous medium convection,Physica D 54 (1992) 331–350.
H. Haken,Advanced Synergetics (Berlin: Springer, 1983).
Ju. S. Il'Yashinko, Global analysis of the phase portrait for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation,J. Dynamics Diff. Eq. (to appear).
F. Jauberteau, C. Rosier, and R. Temam, A nonlinear Galerkin method for the Navier-Stokes equations,Comp. Meths. Appl. Mech. Engr. 80 (1990) 245–260.
M. S. Jolly, I. G. Kevrekidis, and E. S. Titi, Approximate inertial manifolds for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation: analysis and computations,Physica D 44 (1990) 38–60.
M. S. Jolly, I. G. Kevrekidis, and E. S. Titi, Preserving dissipation in approximate inertial forms for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation,J. Dynamics Diff. Eqs. 3 (1990) 179–197.
D. A. Jones and E. S. Titi, A remark on quasi-stationary approximate inertial manifolds for the Navier-Stokes equations, Preprint # 920408, Department of Mathematics, University of California, Irvine; also inSIAM J. Math. Anal. (to appear).
T. B. Lennie, D. P. McKenzie, D. R. Moore, and N. O. Weiss, The breakdown of steady convection,J. Fluid Mech. 188 (1988) 47–85.
X. Liu, Gevrey class regularity and approximate inertial manifolds for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equations,Physica D 50 (1991) 135–151.
M. Marion and R. Temam, Nonlinear Galerkin methods,SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 26(6) (1989) 1139–1157.
P. Metzener and S. H. Davis, An annulus model for time-space transitions in Bénard convection,Physica D 36 (1989) 235–258.
D. S. Riley and K. H. Winters, Modal exchange mechanisms in Lapwood convection,J. Fluid Mech. 204 (1989) 325–358.
L. A. Segel and M. Slemrod, The quasi-steady assumption: a case study in perturbation,SIAM Review 31(3) (1989) 446–477.
P. H. Steen, Pattern selection for finite-amplitude convection states in boxes of porous media,J. Fluid Mech. 136 (1983) 219–241.
P. H. Steen, Container geometry and the transition to unsteady Bénard convection in porous media,Phys. Fluids 29(4) (1986) 925–933.
P. H. Steen and C. K. Aidun, Time-periodic convection in porous media: transition mechanism,J. Fluid Mech. 196 (1988) 263–290.
R. Temam, Inertial manifolds and multigrid methods,SIAM J. Math. Anal. 21(1) (1990) 154–178.
R. Temam, Stability analysis of the nonlinear Galerkin method,Math. Comp. 57 (1991), 477–505.
E. S. Titi, On approximate inertial manifolds to the Navier-Stokes equations,J. Math. Anal. Appl. 149(2) (1990) 540–557.
E. S. Titi, Gevrey class regularity and long time approximations for 3-D convection in porous media (in preparation).
J. A. Yorke and E. D. Yorke, Chaotic Behavior and Fluid Dynamics, inHydrodynamic Instabilities and the Transition to Turbulence, eds. H. L. Swinney and J. P. Gollub (Berlin: Springer, 1981).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by Ioannis Kevrekidis
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Graham, M.D., Steen, P.H. & Titi, E.S. Computational efficiency and approximate inertial manifolds for a Bénard convection system. J Nonlinear Sci 3, 153–167 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02429862
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02429862