Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic validation procedure for the MERA and French WMO-GAW precipitation chemistry networks

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents the setting-up of a validation procedure, especially adapted to the rainwater samples of the MERA and French WMO-GAW networks. A first study reveals that the ion and conductivity balances, usually used as quality criteria, depend on salinity. The statistical tool or “physico-chemical filter” proposed in this paper, includes two mathematical models based on 97th percentile of the ion and conductivity balances, from the 1991 and 1992 data taken as references. This dynamic validation uses the rejection limits which increase with salinity. Its application shows a significant decrease of the total rejection rate between the first and third year of running. This seems to be due to the improvement in quality of the analytical line. The rejected sample inspection does not reveal apparent bias errors for the filter. This kind of validation seems to be well adapted to screen the samples in a precipitation collection network such as MERA and WMO-GAW.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Artz, R. S. and Lavrinenko, R. F.: 1993,Env. Mon. and Ass. 26, 1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Encinas, D., Casado, H. and Lacaux, J. P: 1993,J. Environ. Sci. Health 28, 1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara, H., Sekigichi, K. and Ujiie, A.: 1986,Environ. Sci. Lett. 7, 597.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, M. and Wolfe, D. A.: 1973,Nonparametric Statistical Methods, New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, D. W.: 1963,Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 2, 431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A.: 1984,Water, Air, and Soil Pollut. 21, 271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, L. J. and Yost, K. J.: 1982,Atmos. Environ. 16, 2889.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noller, B. N., Currey, N. A., Ayers, G. P. and Gillet, R. W.: 1990,Sci. Total Environ. 91, 23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinard, P.: 1990, Report for the Ministry of Environment M-90-9 (in french). Direction des Réseaux Atmosphériques, Sainte Foy, Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajsic, S., Otten, Ph. and Van Grieken, R.: 1991,Environmental Technology 12, 257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruijgrok, W. and Römer, F. G.: 1993,Atmos. Environ. 27, 637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sequeira, R.: 1991,Atmos. Environ. 25, 487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaug, J.: 1988, Quality assurance plan for EMEP, Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Lillestrom, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisterson, D. L.: 1989,Water, Air, and Soil Pollut. 43, 61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, E. and Williot, B.: 1993, Report of National Office of Forests (in french), Fontainebleau, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weast, R. C. (ed.): 1989,CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 70th edition, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weijers, E. P. and Vugts, H. F.: 1990,Atmos. Environ. 24, 3021.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plaisance, H., Coddeville, P., Guillermo, R. et al. Dynamic validation procedure for the MERA and French WMO-GAW precipitation chemistry networks. Water Air Soil Pollut 93, 267–284 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404761

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404761

Keywords

Navigation