Abstract
The United States Environmental Protection Agency, with support from the US Department of Energy and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, has been evaluating the feasibility of an effects-based (critical loads) approach to atmospheric pollutant regulation and abatement. The rationale used to develop three of the six steps in a flexible assessment framework (Strickland and others, 1992) is presented along with a discussion of a variety of implementation approaches and their ramifications. The rationale proposes that it is necessary to provide an explicit statement of the condition of the resource that is considered valuable (assessment end point) because: (1) individual ecosystem components may be more or less sensitive to deposition, (2) it is necessary to select indicators of ecosystem condition that can be objectively measured and that reflect changes in the quality of the assessment end point, and (3) acceptable status (i.e., value of indicator and quality of assessment end point at critical load) must be defined. The rationale also stresses the importance of defining the assessment regions and subregions to improve the analysis and understanding of the indicator response to deposition. Subregional definition can be based on a variety of criteria, including informed judgment or quantitative procedures. It also depends on the geographic scale at which exposure and effects models are accurate and on data availability, resolution, and quality.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Aber, J. D., K. J. Nadelhoffer, P. Steudler, and J. M. Mellilo. 1989. Nitrogen saturation in northern forest ecosystems.Bioscience 39:378–386.
Agren, G. I., ad E. Bosatta. 1988. Nitrogen saturation of terrestrial ecosystems.Environmental Pollution 54:159–184.
Bailey, R. G. 1980. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. USDA Miscellaneous Publication 1391. United States Department of Agriculture, Ogden, Utah.
Baker, J. 1989. Biological effects of changes in surface water acid-base chemistry. NAPAP state-of-science and technology report 13. National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program, Washington, DC.
Carpenter, D. E. 1990. Testing a framework for assessing acidic deposition impacts on a large region. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Church, M. R., K. W. Thornton, P. W. Shaffer, D. L. Stevens, D. P. Rochelle, G. R. Holdren, M. G. Johnson, J. J. Lee,, R. S. Turner, D. L. Cassell, D. A. Lammers, W. G. Campbell, C. I. Liff, C. C. Brandt, L. H. Liegel, G. D. Bishop, D. C. Mortenson, S. M. Pierson, and D. D. Schmoyer. 1989. Direct/delayed response project: Future effects of long-term sulfur deposition on surface water chemistry in the northeast and southern Blue Ridge Province. Volume I: Executive summary, project approach and data sources. A contribution of the National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program. EPA/600/3-89/061a. US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon.
Gallant, A. L., T. R. Whittier, D. P. Larsen, J. M. Omernik, and R. M. Hughes. 1989. Regionalization as a tool for managing environmental resources. EPA/600/3-89/060. US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon.
Hicks, B., R. McMillen, R. S. Turner, G. R. Holdren, and T. C. Strickland. 1992. A national critical loads framework for atmospheric deposition effects assessment: III. Deposition characterization.Environmental Management.
Holdren, G. R., Jr., T. C. Strickland, B. J. Cosby, D. Marmorek, D. Bernard, R. Santore, C. T. Driscoll, L. Pardo, C. Hunsaker, and R. S. Turner. 1992. A national critical loads framework for atmospheric deposition effects assessment: IV. Model selection, applications, and critical loads mapping.Environmental Management 17:355–363.
Hunsaker, C. T., and D. E. Carpenter (eds.). 1990. Ecological indicators for the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program. EPA 600/3-90-060. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Hunsaker, C. T., and R. L. Graham. 1991. Regional ecological assessment for air pollution. Pages 312–334in S. K. Majumdar, E. W. Miller, and J. Cahir (eds.), Air pollution: Environmental issues and health effects. The Pennsylvania Academy of Science, Easton, Pennsylvania.
Hunsaker, C. T., R. L. Graham, G. W. Suter II, R. V. O’Neill, L. W. Barnthouse, and R. H. Gardner. 1990. Assessing ecological risk on a regional scale.Environmental Management 14(3):325–332.
Linthurst, R. A., D. H. Landers, J. M. Eilers, D. F. Brakke, W. S. Overton, E. P. Meier, and R. E. Crowe. 1986. Characteristics of lakes in the eastern United States. Volume I: Population descriptions and physico-chemical relationships. EPA/600/4-86/007a. US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Nilsson, J. 1986. Critical Loads for nitrogen and sulphur. Miljørapport 1986;11. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen.
Nilsson, J., and P. Grennfelt. 1988. Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen. Report from a workshop held at Skokloster, Sweden, 19–24 March, 1988. NORD 1988:15 UN ECE and Nordic Council of Ministers, Solna, Sweden.
Omernik, J. M. 1987. Map supplement: Ecoregions of the conterminous United States.Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77:118–125.
Skeffington, R. A. and E. J. Wilson. 1988. Excess nitrogen deposition: Issues for consideration.Environmental Pollution 54:159–184.
Strickland, T. C., G. R. Holdren, Jr., P. L. Ringold, D. Bernard, K. Smythe, and W. Fallon. 1992. A national critical loads framework for atmospheric deposition effects assessment: I. Method summary.Environmental Management.
Suter, G. W. II. 1989. Ecological endpoints. Pages 2-1–2-28 in W. Warren-Hicks, B. R. Parkhurst and S. S. Baker, Jr. (eds.), Ecological assessment of hazardous waste sites: A field and laboratory reference. EPA/600/3-89/013. US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon.
Suter, G. W. II. 1990. Endpoints for regional ecological risk assessments.Environmental Management 14(1):9–23.
Swedish Ministry of Agriculture. 1982. Acidification today and tomorrow. Environment ’82 Committee, Stockholm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research described in this article has been funded by the US Environmental Protection Agency. This document has been prepared at the EPA Environmental Research Laboratory in Corvallis, Oregon, through contract #68-C8-0006 with ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., and Interagency Agreement #1824-B014-A7 with the US Department of Energy and at Oak Ridge National Laboratory managed by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., under Contract DE-AC05-84OR21400 with the US Department of Energy. Environmental Sciences Division Publication No. 3903. It has been subjected to the agency’s peer and administrative review and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hunsaker, C., Graham, R., Turner, R.S. et al. A national critical loads framework for atmospheric deposition effects assessment: II. Defining assessment end points, indicators, and functional subregions. Environmental Management 17, 335–341 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394676
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394676